User talk:WestWingFan

License tagging for Image:S02e01 650.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:S02e01 650.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

"West Wing" Infobox
Hey buddy,

Kudos on the idea of creating an infobox for each character. That's smart and original thinking. I have one big issue with it, though, which is that it is full of spoilers. For example, the infobox on Leo McGarry gives away his divorce in Season 1, his resignation as Chief of Staff in Season 6, and his death at the end of Season 7. The other infoboxes likewise contain spoilers. This doesn't necessarily mean that you have to scrap the idea. However, I do think you should to revise it so that it doesn't include spoilers. (Others may argue that this belongs on a fan website and that it's unencyclopedic. I don't know where I stand in that debate, but I'm not going to make an issue out of it here.)

So, could you please modify the infobox so that it doesn't include spoilers? Thanks! --Hnsampat 22:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Sure. Some series' characters' infoboxes have spoilers in them as well, but I see your point. I'll modify them. WestWingFan 22:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

I would say take Percy and Leo's deaths out, because for many of them, the reason will be "series ended". Their changes of occupation and marital status are spoilery, but less of a visceral emotional impact, less of a downer.

Major props for adding the infoboxes. Looks good visually and informationally. TransUtopian 23:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! WestWingFan 23:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

You're right about how other series' infoboxes have tons of spoilers, although I don't think that's necessarily right. Here's a few suggestions on how to eliminate spoilers (and some other overall suggestions):
 * With the exceptions of Sam, Will, Vinick, Santos, and a few others, most of the main characters are there for the entire series, so do we really need to show their first/last appearances? (This is debatable.)
 * The reason for the departure of the character is inevitably going to be a spoiler, so I strongly say that you should get rid of this.
 * "Created by" is not needed, I feel, since Aaron Sorkin basically created all of these (with the exception of the few characters that were created after he left the show).
 * "Portrayed by" is a necessary bit of information and should definitely be kept.
 * "Gender" is probably kind of obvious and is probably not needed (though no harm in keeping it).
 * Information about family may or may not be spoilers. For example, it's not a spoiler to say that Leo has a daughter named Mallory but it is a spoiler to say that he gets divorced in Season 1. Likewise, it's definitely a spoiler to say that C.J.'s spouse is Danny. This is a bit ambiguous and so I'm not sure what to do about it. (In the case of C.J., I'd get rid of that bit about Danny being her husband, since it happens after the series ends.)
 * "Occupation" can get a bit complicated. For example, in the case of the Leo article, we had a big issue about how to explain Leo's role in the series without any spoilers. What I finally did was to say that he "begins the series as White House Chief of Staff" and then explaining the rest of his occupations under a spoiler warning.

So, the only stuff I know we can keep for sure right now is "portrayed by" and "gender" (if we choose to keep the latter). I'm not sure what else we can add without adding spoilers. We should get some more opinions on this. --Hnsampat 23:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I'd say first/last appearance aren't spoilers and should stay. The reason for last appearance would be either a spoiler or unnecessary and I agree on dropping that. I also agree Created by and gender are unnecessary, as I didn't even notice them when skimming the infoboxes.


 * What about placing spoilers below in the infobox for other spoilery info (marital/occupation) similar to the way it's in the body? TransUtopian 23:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that's a good idea and it removes all the hassle of what to keep, what's a spoiler, etc. WestWingFan 23:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Works for me. I notice you did Percy. I did Leo and CJ, removing gender (template says "if not obvious") and cause (my opinion) and adding  spoilers below  after the last="name of episode". Otherwise it appears after Age. I'm a shrug re: Created by. TransUtopian 13:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:S02e09 663.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:S02e09 663.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AndreaWyatt408.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AndreaWyatt408.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MarleeMatlin114.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MarleeMatlin114.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)