User talk:West Virginian/Archive 32

DYK for John H. Hill
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein


The article Peter, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Angie Turner King copyedit

 * , thank you so much for completed another thorough, comprehensive copyedit! I really appreciate it, and all your continued contributions to improve the quality of Wikipedia! -- West Virginian   (talk)  23:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the kind words; your articles are always a pleasure to copyedit. Stay well and all the best,  Mini  apolis  01:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Clips Mill, West Virginia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clips Mill, West Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Clips Mill, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 15:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Marshall McDonald
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article on Marshall McDonald has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

If I could make one suggestion? The United States Fish Commission section it ends recounting McDonald issuing a warning about salmon fishing on the Columbia. It might be worthwhile if you have the details to explain briefly why he felt the outlook was "disastrous".

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you tremendously for your thorough and comprehensive copyedit of this article! I will review this portion of the article and work to see if I can add more information or context. Thank you! -- West Virginian   (talk)  13:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrKay (talk) 05:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James M. Canty
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James M. Canty you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James M. Canty
The article James M. Canty you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:James M. Canty for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James M. Canty
The article James M. Canty you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:James M. Canty for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Isaac Parsons (American military officer)
Hi, I was going through some harv ref errors and it seems that refs 13 and 14 (Virginia House of Delegates 1856) in Isaac Parsons (American military officer) don't point to anything. Would you happen to know what is missing from the biblio? Aza24 (talk) 04:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you for this catch and for notifying me. I've added the appropriate reference for these two citations. Please let me know if you find any similar issues in other articles that I've assisted with. Thanks again! -- West Virginian   (talk)  14:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Happy to help. If you want to keep an eye out of harv ref errors in the future, I would recommend copying: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js, to your js page. It's the one I've been using and it makes it easy to spot errors, the only annoyance is that if you're showing the preview for a section, it will say every ref has an error since it can't connect to biblio, but outside the editor the errors will show up in the refs. Aza24 (talk) 21:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Aza24, thank you so much for providing me with this information about the .js HarvErrors tool! I've added it and will be cognizant of any errors before publishing in the future. Thanks again! -- West Virginian   (talk)  22:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is, the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by. In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were, , and. The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.


 * wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
 * win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
 * wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
 * wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
 * wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
 * wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

James McHenry Jones
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article James McHenry Jones has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , as always, I really appreciate you taking the time to complete this thorough and comprehensive copyedit. I value your time, guidance, and hard work. Thank you for improving the quality of Wikipedia's articles one copyedit and contribution at a time! Otherwise did you have any overall assessment of comments about the article? Thanks again! -- West Virginian   (talk)  17:15, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. I always find the subjects you write about interesting. I think the article is in great shape. I did wonder about

this—"despite his early unfavorable environment—the "tough", "bloody First" Ward of Pomeroy." Life cannot have been easy for a family of ten. I assume they were forced by circumstances to live in a less than ideal location. Perhaps a little more detail about what made this neighborhood so "tough" and "bloody" and his early childhood, if it is known, would interest the reader. Stay safe. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much for your kind words and for your thoughtful feedback! I greatly appreciate and value your guidance and suggestions, and will work on expanding this section to provide more clarity and context. Thank you again, as always! -- West Virginian   (talk)  16:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

William Armstrong (Virginia politician)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article William Armstrong (Virginia politician) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I just had one question after reading the article. Do we know why Armstrong reserved half an acre for an African-American cemetery? Was this an act of charity, another business venture or ...? Just curious. Best of luck with the DYK and GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much for your review, copyedit, and feedback. And thank you for this question! I am still researching for more information as to the circumstances of this reservation, and as I find information, I will try and add as much context as possible. Thanks again for another thorough copyedit of this article! -- West Virginian   (talk)  14:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)


 * You're very welcome. I'll be curious to read what you find. Stay safe Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Warren Davis (college president)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Warren Davis (college president) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 17:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much for taking on this GAN! I look forward to working with you throughout this process. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns in the meantime! Thanks again! -- West Virginian   (talk)  17:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

That Harv cite ref tool
If you go to User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors you can see an explanation of this tool, what it does, and where to install it if you wish. I find it very useful and use it often, to spotlight Harvard cite errors & issues. I see you're an experienced editor so apologies if you already have it installed. Shearonink (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much for sharing this with me. I've added this code accordingly. -- West Virginian   (talk)  23:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sir Augustus FitzGeorge (retouched).jpg
Hi, I saw your request under mine at the Graphics Lab. I could crop the picture for you using CropTool, and I could show you how to do it yourself, as someone showed me. Best, Yoninah (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I would greatly appreciate that! Thank you! -- West Virginian   (talk)  01:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, now I see that I can't :( . CropTool is available at Commons, but not at Wikipedia. Oh well. Yoninah (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , that's quite alright! I really appreciate you reaching out to help, and thank you for all your continued guidance, leadership, and coordination! It's always a pleasure to work with you! -- West Virginian   (talk)  23:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

West Virginia
I see that you make articles about West Virginia and I was wondering if you could make one for the West Virginia municipal courts thanks and let me know Bigmike2346 (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your message, and I would be happy to. Are there any examples of related articles on municipal courts that you could provide for guidance? Thanks again! — West Virginian   (talk)  20:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Municipal_Courts Maybe you could do something like this
 * , thank you. I’ll add this to my queue! — West Virginian   (talk)  21:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

I’m trying to see if we can get all the courts in the US made so if you are able to do some others please let me know

The Signpost: 29 November 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Congrats, it's a....

 * , thank you so much again for your comprehensive and thorough review of this article for GA status! It was a sincere pleasure to work with you throughout this process, and I look forward to working with you again in the future! -- West Virginian   (talk)  13:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Warren Davis (college president)
The article John Warren Davis (college president) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Warren Davis (college president) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 05:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Augustus FitzGeorge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Augustus FitzGeorge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for James M. Canty
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Augustus FitzGeorge
The article Augustus FitzGeorge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Augustus FitzGeorge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Wilson-Wodrow-Mytinger House
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Wilson–Wodrow–Mytinger House has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You used the word "pent" in the Residential Structure section. It's clearly an architectural term, but I was unable to find a definition. Perhaps you could add one in brackets after it? I also wondered about (but did not change) the use of the endash between the house names. Endashes are usually used with a range of numbers, dates or time. I'm wondering whether they shouldn't be changed to simple dashes? I leave that up to you. Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:21, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you for another thorough and comprehensive review and copyedit! I will address each of these comments and suggestions shortly, and will let you know if I have any further questions or need any further guidance in the meantime! Thanks again! -- West Virginian   (talk)  14:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , per your guidance and my review of MoS guidelines, I've modified the article title to Wilson-Wodrow-Mytinger House, without en dashes. I'm now working to add more context regarding pents. Thanks again for your improvement of this article, and for your guidance! -- West Virginian   (talk)  19:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * You're very welcome. I always enjoy the opportunity to edit your articles. Stay safe. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings


Hello there! Shearonink (talk) wishes you & yours the very best of the season!

Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia, here's to: hoping your holiday time is wonderful and - especially -

that the New Year 2021 will be an improvement upon the old of 2020. CHEERS!

Share these holiday wishes by adding   to your friends' talk pages.

(Sent: 04:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC))
 * , thank you for the very thoughtful and inclusive holiday wishes! In my family, we celebrate everything during the holiday season, especially Christmas and Diwali (or Deepavali as my family says in Tamil Nadu)! Here's wishing you a very Happy Holidays in return, and thank you for all your phenomenal contributions to Wikipedia! It's been a pleasure working with you this year, and here's looking forward to future collaboration and coordination! -- West Virginian   (talk)  14:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Harry J. Capehart
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Harry J. Capehart has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I noticed that you used a number of gender-neutral terms in the article: city councilperson, chairperson (lede); chairpersons (Later political activities), and chairperson (Organizational affiliations). I tried to find mention of the use of gender-neutral terms in the WP MOS to no avail, but it seems jarring to me to use terms that don't accurately reflect what the positions were called when Capehart was alive. Clearly, as the article's creator, however, that is your choice.

Best of luck with the GAN/DYK.

Regards,

14:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much for another thorough, thoughtful, and comprehensive review and copyedit! As always, I appreciate and value your time and expertise! The article's flow has vastly improved! And thank you for your feedback regarding my usage of gender-neutral terms in the article. Usage of gender-neutral terms has long been a personal habit and practice of mine; however, to your point, MOS:GNL is not specific regarding position titles, and the essay Gender-neutral language seems to suggest that titles should reflect the title preferred by the subject (with the example of a woman who preferred to be titled as chairman). I'll give this some additional thought in the meantime! I also wanted to let you know that I added an explanatory footnote in Wilson-Wodrow-Mytinger House to explain what a chimney pent was--thank you again for that suggestion! Have a very Happy Holidays and thanks again for everything you do to improve the quality, flow, and content of Wikipedia's articles! -- West Virginian   (talk)  15:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * You're most welcome. Happy Holidays to you too. Stay safe! Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Potomac Green, Virginia


The article Potomac Green, Virginia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Subdivision fails WP:GEOLAND-2. Notability for senior citizen housing development not established."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 03:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Thomas S. Riley
West Virginian. Took up your request on copy editing of the article Thomas S. Riley. Did some minor stylistic revisions. It didn't need much. Good article; interesting guy. If anything, too many citations. But I suppose that's much better than too few. Overall a very good article on someone I never knew about, but do now. Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 20:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much for this thorough review, copyedit, and for your stylistic revisions! I really appreciate it, and hope you're having happy holidays in the meantime! I look forward to working with you again on a future project! -- West Virginian   (talk)  14:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Augustus FitzGeorge
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for John Warren Davis (college president)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thomas S. Riley

 * , thank you so much for your thorough and comprehensive review and copyedit of this article. I greatly appreciate all of your efforts to improve the quality of Wikipedia, one article at a time! Thanks again! -- West Virginian   (talk)  18:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Dames of the Order of Louise has been nominated for listification
Category:Dames of the Order of Louise has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Januarius has been nominated for deletion
Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Januarius has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit has been nominated for deletion
Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Knights Commander of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit has been nominated for deletion
Category:Knights Commander of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Knights of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit has been nominated for deletion
Category:Knights of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Order of Saint Januarius has been nominated for deletion
Category:Order of Saint Januarius has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Dames of the Order of the Starry Cross has been nominated for deletion
Category:Dames of the Order of the Starry Cross has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Grand Mistresses of the Order of the Starry Cross has been nominated for deletion
Category:Grand Mistresses of the Order of the Starry Cross has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Order of the Starry Cross has been nominated for deletion
Category:Order of the Starry Cross has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Joseph has been nominated for deletion
Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Joseph has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Augustus FitzGeorge
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Augustus FitzGeorge has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I changed "chairperson" to "chairman" which would have been the title in FitzGeorge's time. Please revert if you do not agree.

Happy New Year. Stay safe. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you again for another thorough review and copyedit! I appreciate all you do to improve the quality of Wikipedia! -- West Virginian   (talk)  18:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)