User talk:Westcoastkitty77

Welcome!
Hello, Westcoastkitty77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Thanks for the useful info :) --Westcoastkitty77 (talk) 20:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Getting started (Resolved)
Okay, I'm new here. Is this where I'm suppose to set up my messages? I don't really work on here often, but would probably need a place for other members to leave messages... Will read through pages. Westcoastkitty77 (talk) 05:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi - you may want to look at WP:User pages. However, also suggest you first read this section.  Thanks.   7  05:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the tips and links. --Westcoastkitty77 (talk) 07:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

US government documents
Could you please provide details on the document mentioned. TFD (talk) 15:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please feel free to reply right here with details of what you think is a forged documement. You can also place this exact text:  including the brackets on the page to draw attention to it.   7  23:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, It's #28 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics#Notes Clicking #28 PDF link downloads it to your computer. You'll need to print, I think, to see all 9 or so unnumbered pages. I brought it to someone to look at and they confirmed. They said anyone with knowledge/experience with PDFs should probably be able to tell it's a forgery, also.


 * 1) These federal documents are typically published in PDF format. This document appears typed up first in Word and pasted in the HTML. 2) Banner at the top is incorrect font. Symbols have been copied. 3) They don't do conjecture, just facts. Also, if this was a real report, this would be classified information and not available to the public. And so on.


 * This was also written on the talk page, btw, but no one has responded yet. (Another wikipedian suggested that I should bring this to the "reliable source" page. (?) If more information is needed for confirmation, please let me know and I'll be happy to do what I can. Thanks --Westcoastkitty77 (talk) 16:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I am a bit out of my depth here, so I have posted this on the RS noticeboard. Please watch the argument there and add any further comments there to keep the conversation in one place.  Regards.   7  01:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)