User talk:Wetmackeral

Proposed deletion of Vortex (paranormal)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vortex (paranormal), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Closedmouth (talk) 02:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I have addressed the issues specified in your noticeabout article Vortex (paranormal). Why is the deletion notice still there? It should have been removed a while back. I would like to see it taken care of within the week. You have no right to continue the threat of deletion. Thank you. wetmackeral

AfD nomination of Vortex (paranormal)
I have nominated Vortex (paranormal), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vortex (paranormal). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Closedmouth (talk) 12:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Closedmouth (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Closedmouth (talk) 04:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Closedmouth (talk) 04:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Vortex (paranormal) and User:Closedmouth
First of all you left the comment at User:Closedmouth and it should have been at User talk:Closedmouth and I've moved it over. Second it's not up to User:Closedmouth to remove the AfD notice but it's up to the Wikipedia community. And you are part of the community so you too can go to Articles for deletion/Vortex (paranormal) and say why you think it should be kept. An article sent to AfD is usually listed for 5 days. In this case the admin that looked at it felt there was a need to extend the discussion and it will stay open for a bit longer. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

British National Party
You've left a bias on this article but haven't justified it on the Talk page; this means that we don't know what complaints you may have. I'll remove the tag in due course if you feel unable to support the tagging. Thanks. -- Rodhull andemu  19:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)