User talk:Wflynn12

I submitted an article - "Free Online Credit Reports" your editors because of the title ASSUMED it was spam - none even read it! The article explains how to contact the credit reporting agencies and government agencies to recieve your credit reports - no website is referenced at all that could be considered spam?! The only thing I can think of is that they confused AnnualCreditReport.com to be spam but that is the website created by the 3 reporting agencies as a central place to request credit reports! Look at this link https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/helpabout or even contact the reporting agencies themselves that is where you MUST go to requst a free credit report from them which is allowed once a year. I own USLister.com and you can see a copy of the article there at http://www.uslister.com/realty/resources/free-online-credit-reports.html and this information was purely informational and helpfull and spam free. I am now blocked as spammer what can I do? At least tell me where you think I spammed as I am at a loss.

William Flynn

Where were these smacks of self-promotion? The report made no mention of my website just the reporting agencies and government agencies needed to get a free credit report. As far as resubmitting I did this figuring someone would actually read the article before wrongly assuming spam but apparently they all just read the title and assumed it was spam as you did. I will not post on wikipedia anymore as I feel your editors are not doing a good job sorting out the spam. Everytime I challenge someone to point out the source of spam in this article they avoid answering this question. Everytime?