User talk:Wfpalmer


 * }

Regarding your edits to Air France Flight 447
Hello, Wfpalmer. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Re: Info on Understanding Air France 447 deleted
Re your message: I removed your inclusion of the review of your book because it was a clear advertisement for your book and you have a conflict of interest regarding the book as noted in the message I left to you earlier. As noted to you on the article talk page, it would be best if you did not write about your own book. Specifically, see MilborneOne's replies to you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)