User talk:Wgcw

Welcome!
Hello, Wgcw, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as NHAMO, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dogsix (talk) 03:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of NHAMO


The article NHAMO has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. A Google search for support of the awards finds nothing to support the statement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 03:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eunice Chiweshe Goldstein


A tag has been placed on Eunice Chiweshe Goldstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  The StormCatcher   (talk)   (contribs)  06:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Eunice Chiweshe Goldstein. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 14:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of NHAMO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NHAMO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NHAMO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Have made the proper edts. Thank you. Wgcw (talk) 16:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of D Lynch for deletion
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 02:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eunice Chiweshe Goldstein (2nd nomination). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 00:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing
I am politely asking you to stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to do it, you will be blocked. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)