User talk:Wguskind

Welcome!
Hi Wguskind! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! hulmem (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 12:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fairfax County, Virginia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kent County, Delaware, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fairfield, Connecticut. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:33, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lowndes County, Mississippi. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Commentary and analysis
A lot of your edits seem to include commentary and analysis, sometimes implied, sometimes stated outright. Please review Wikipedia's policies about original analysis. Wikipedia readers don't come here to find out what you think about political trends or what you think election results mean. Citing a source the confirms the numbers you quote isn't enough when you're also telling the reader what you think is "interesting" about them. Unless you can also cite a reliable source (which in this context means one without an obvious political agenda) that has already published this analysis... don't add it. Thanks. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk  22:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)