User talk:Whalenski

April 2018
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Dennis Prager, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Whalenski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Notice about articles about living people
Jytdog (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

You're editing yourself into a quick block if you keep on adding unsourced opinion to a BLP. --Neil N  talk to me 19:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Dennis Prager‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Seeking Consensus on Prager Article
How/Where do I discuss what I actually wrote (in the Prager article) with other editors in order to come to some kind of consensus? I really do wish to add some material to that page in order to make it a bit more representative of the subject’s POV. As it stands, the article mis-represents Mr. Prager to some extent (as others haved suggested in their comments). Whalenski (talk) 22:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Here: Talk:Dennis Prager. But local consensus cannot override site policies. In this case, WP:BLP mandates all contentious info needs to be sourced. --Neil N  talk to me 22:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)