User talk:Whatabunchofbs

Welcome!
Hi Whatabunchofbs! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 20:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:2021 Waukesha Christmas parade car rampage are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages.   ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you have specific proposals regarding changes, that's fine, but comparing two different articles isn't generally productive. Instead, articles should be evaluated against Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding what content is appropriate or how it should be worded. clpo13(talk) 19:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * why is it not "generally productive" and what does that even mean? Why do you constantly hide behind lies to justify what you do? Whatabunchofbs (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Articles are frequently developed independently of each other by different editors, meaning they stand on their own merits. Articles should instead be judged by the aforementioned policies and guidelines (particularly those about verifiability and neutral point of view). I haven't been removing the discussion, if that's what you're accusing me of. I'm just giving an explanation for why it might have been removed. There have been a lot of people venting on this article without indicating clear changes they want made (which is what article talk pages are for; they're not forums or chat rooms), so everyone's a bit touchy. clpo13(talk) 20:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions, BLP, and sources
Please note that WP:BLP applies everywhere on Wikipedia.

If you are to put negative or controversial info anywhere on Wikipedia, it must be accompanied by a reliable source somewhere. Best practice is to include it with your comment. If it's in the article you're discussing, point to it. But you may not make unqualified claims about racial bias, criminal intent, etc. without reliable sources.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 23:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)