User talk:Whaterss

Speedy deletions
Hi. Thanks for the work on NPP, but you need to review WP:CSD and WP:BITE first. Sri Sairam College of Engineering is a legitimate article about a college, and quite coherent, but you tagged it db-g1. The value of wallpapers was also coherent, although it was redundant, and should have been tagged db-a10|Wallpaper (computing). It's important to get this right, otherwise new editors will get discouraged and walk away in confusion. Thanks, Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

nasaa
hi - thanks for the edit - i'm on an acronym roll tonight Shaztastic (talk) 09:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huzaifa Mazhar (HM), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SMA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Whaterss (talk) 00:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Douban, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have justified my edit. Whaterss (talk) 08:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Citobun (talk) 04:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medusa society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please help stop vandalism on Wolf Warriors 2
Hello Whaterss. Please stop this random user from vandalizing Wolf Warriors 2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Warriors_2

§ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:86CC:4100:3512:9D00:6858:2D0D (talk) 11:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Your recent editing history at Wolf Warriors 2 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Citobun (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I know 3rr rule. Don't worry, i won't get blocked.Whaterss (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SQL Query me! 22:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)