User talk:Whatewehtpp

February 2013
Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Schrödinger's cat because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I am One of Many (talk) 08:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Schrödinger's Goob Trilogy


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Schrödinger's Goob Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. I am One of Many (talk) 08:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Nick—Contact/Contribs 08:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * If there is really a novel trilogy, read Notability (books) before spending any time writing about it. Otherwise, read Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Schrödinger's cat. Nick—Contact/Contribs 09:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)