User talk:Wheatn.edu

Recreation of same old stuff
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Deleted after a deletion debate consensus favoring delete: Articles for deletion/Quantum fiction and Deletion review -- Orange Mike |  Talk  15:38, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because this username appears to be an impersonation of a legitimate educational organization, wheaton.edu; and has edited an article to include a reference to a professor and/or class taught there (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike |  Talk  17:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

User OrangeMike Non Neutral POV and history of Deletions
This article on Quantum fiction needs to be restored. User Orangemike shows up as a vandal on history changes to the Vanna Bonta Wikipedia article, she is the author of (Flight a quantum fiction novel). Orangemike is the same guy who with his group of friends and writers from an amateur science fiction community associated with Tor Books tried to get the Vanna Bonta article deleted from Wikipedia and used attacks, insult, and slander a few years ago. Now he is going after a Quantum fiction article because that author coined the term? It is also documented as occurring in other places on the net. I had read but now I see it with my own experience. So I ask...what's going on? Orangemike's deletion of Quantum fiction article is biased and non-neutral POV. Just look at the article.

I see a Wikpedia article of Quantum fiction was deleted in 2007 -- five years ago. Another User saved the article because the debate was even votes. Some even accused the people arguing to have it deleted of being biased with professional "conflict of interests." There appears to be a pattern of obsession by Orangemike and friends with quantum fiction and the original quantum fiction book author. I can go find more names.

Based on Wikipedia standards for an article, there is no way an article on Quantum fiction does not meet the criteria. Wikipedia needs to look into this ASAP because it is Wikipedia abuse and interferes with legitimate work. The article was deleted in 2007 and five years later there are courses being taught and shows produced and book written and reviews written in the genre of Quantum fiction.

As for my account I posted college info on a quantum fiction article. No nefarious "impersonation" intended. Seems like a very radical reaction considering I am just posting citations of published works on quantum physics in literature by a professor. Wheatn.edu (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

unblocked - change your name
As you were hardblocked for having a WP:COI username I've unblocked you so you can change your username. I suggest you avoid picking fights with OrangeMike, as I said in my email. I don't know how, in 2012, as a newbie, that you would know that an article Quantum Fiction had been deleted four years earlier. You were bitten badly for having a spam-looking username. Secretlondon (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

AfD on a page you have previously edited or commented on a previous Afd
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Quantum fiction (2nd nomination).  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)