User talk:WheezerCarl

Reverted edits
I reverted your recent changes to Fanboys (film) because it appeared all the material you added was either Original research with no evidence or creating an UNDUE balance between reviews by renowned professional critics like Roger Ebert and reviews by people like random Rotten Tomatoes users and “HelloGreedo” Dronebogus (talk) 08:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * But why would the opinions of Fans and the people not matter in a movie FOR FANS mady BY FANS? WheezerCarl (talk) 08:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Because Wikipedia does mot consider no-name reviewers Reliable sources Dronebogus (talk) 08:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * But as far as I am concerned HelloGreedo isn't a no-name reviewer and he falls under "biased sources" due to him being a Star Wars fan/YouTuber. In addition to all that; this is after all section about the reception of the film, and a major online creator in the Star Wars fandom positively reviewed the film. While, sure it's biased, and he isn't a professional movie critic, he is however a major influence in the commentating industry with hundreds of thousands of followers, merely, much like every critic, stating his own opinion. I'll add in that these are HelloGreedo's own words and opinions. Obviously it's not "fact", as is the case with reviews. What is however a fact is that the general reception of fans today (over a decade later) is mostly positive with tons of people expressing their love for the film. WheezerCarl (talk) 08:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You’re making an appeal to popularity. Wikipedia generally only uses proffesional critics as sources, especially if the majority of the reviews cited are already from professional critics, and never uses anonymous audience review metrics as sources. Dronebogus (talk) 09:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, then I'll add some reviews by critics, but I'm still gonna change the seciton layout. Jurassic Park has a "Release" and "Reception" section. Here on Fanboys Critical reception is under the Release section which makes no sense. I'll just re-arrange those sections so the Wikipage just has a nicer more coherent layout WheezerCarl (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)