User talk:Whenceslittlebutterfly

Gina Roche
A tag has been placed on Gina Roche, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Gina Roche is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Gina Roche. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.

Wikipedia is not a bulletin board for selling products. Fan-1967 23:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove the tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.

Also, do not remove legitimate warning messages from your Talk page. Fan-1967 23:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

What's obejctionable about the article?
What's objectionable is that you're trying to use Wikipedia to sell stuff. This is an encyclopedia, not a flea market or classified section. Period. End of story. Fan-1967 23:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)