User talk:Where/2

regrettably, long after fans forget their sports careers, the locker stuffing incident will be remembered.
It was the Matt Robinson or Richard Todd for starting QB controversy and Serby wanted Robinson. John wesley 16:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

rude.
What are you saying about being rude? Are you saying that I'm rude or the people that are being rude to me? 0waldo 01:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Another comment from an anon
freaky people are losers!! hi sexy ladies!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.67 (talk • contribs)

sorry man
sorry man ill stop —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.70.202.108 (talk • contribs)

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Here are some other hints and tips:


 * I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username.  (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)


 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~&#126;). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on or you can type    on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome!

Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.  Wh e re  (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Independent operability
Hi, I can see why you blanked the talk page entry, but is there a case for just striking it out instead? It certainly makes a statement about its author and isn't a direct attack on any individual. Seems a shame for such deathless prose to be invisible except to those who burrow through the history! Dl yo ns 493  Ta lk  14:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN seems like a good home for it!  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  14:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Bose Headphone Family
Check out the most recent edit. I'm still fairly new at the processes and procedures of wiki editing, but I've tried to remain consistant with the terms now that I've taken the time to review them - spurred, as you would imagine, by you saying something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.39.148.149 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Independent Operability
At first glance the idea of my entry of "independent operability" may seem self serving. I understand. However, I am nicely retired and most likely would not work again if I was "vain". I hereby CONTEST Wikipedia's policy of blanket banning all "vanity" entries as that is the sign of a system that only supports those who have nothing to "brag" about in the first place and keeps many power producers from bothering to do anything anymore. I produced the technology of late to help others and I am highly disgusted at the insane interest in attacking it particularly when it seems that not a person attacking seems to have a slight clue (and some even admit it) as to what it is about and this fact alone warrants the removal of all the comments forthwith. This is NOT a comment place for bubble headed Madonna groupies. Large money has gone into this important project and not a dime has been spent on me. The project cannot live without funding so I hope a small note of my name and the patent will be a gratitude for the years of work many have put into it. I bet none of you remember Phill Pharnsworth do you? Well you're USING his invention RIGHT NOW. And I DON'T plan on beeing an UNKNOWN for my work.

This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, you know the thing that teaches the children? If all of you knew what you are attacking you would be sorry. This is why I had no compunction about nuking the first comment from the peanut gallery that opened the mouth before thinking (and I made certain to take out all the usual detractors that in fact DO know of my work and attack it for selfish reasons (such as the ELF, Unibomber, & other sorts of lunatic TECHNOPHOBS).

Let me teach you a thing or two about the first step in becoming smart. If someone says something and it is not CLEARLY NONSENSE, and you DON'T UNDERSTAND IT. PLEASE, DON'T COMMENT ON IT UNTIL YOU FIND OUT WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT OR AT LEAST BE COURTEOUS ENOUGH TO ASK A FEW QUESTIONS FIRST. And to the HACKER WANA-BE WHO USED THE TERM "PATENTCRUFT", I REST MY CASE ON MY (WHAT YOU CALL AMUSING) COINED TERM "PATENT HATTER", there's one RIGHT THERE (and there's quite a few of them out there indeed). BAN HIM! You ALL sound like DINOSAURS MATING. If there are stupid patents allowed, blame the patent office, not ALL inventors please because THIS one is NOT. Stop being childs.

P.S. To the one constructive comment as to independent operability being "self replication". It IS self replication. A more specific form of it that NEEDS to be TAUGHT to the masses for Mechagenics to be understood. It's INDEPENDENT REPLICATION (and I did not coin the term, it's been around a long time). I will dutifully edit the entry to correct on that. Thank you so much for pointing out that thoughtful fact. Also patents are ALL PUBLISHED (pursuant to your comments on the entry being not "sourced"). Where's the moderators around here? I hope a few have a little brains on this, thank you very much. Also, five days seems a bit short a time for proper debate on this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fraberj (talk • contribs) 00:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

I've replied on my talk page
... --Syrthiss 18:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikibot test
Though hast been spammed. Hah! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Where2 (talk • contribs) 00:27 01 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikibot test
This is another test —Preceding unsigned comment added by Where2 (talk • contribs) 15:05 2 April 2006 (UTC)

TEST
foo bar

Hmm wasn't me, sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.166.14 (talk • contribs) 02:41 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it was me! --MiszaBot 20:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Spam message from MiszaBot
This is a spam message from the friendly Misza13's spam bot! This message carries virtually no information, so please feel free to delete it altogether.

Bot or Sock?
Really, I saw you got this "bot" called Where2. Is it a bot? If so, please state so on its page.--166.121.36.8 01:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

A KISS Rfa Thanks
Thank you, I've been promoted. psch e  mp  |  talk  01:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page if you have any questions. AmiDaniel (Talk) 22:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship
 Sceptre would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Sceptre to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
 * so I voted for nothing? :P I  Lov  E Plankton 18:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)