User talk:WhinyTheYounger/Archives/2021/October

Untitled
Welcome -- Kayoty (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you!! -- WhinyTheYounger (talk) 03:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamond Princess ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2020_coronavirus_outbreak_in_Taiwan check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2020_coronavirus_outbreak_in_Taiwan?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

YGM
Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 00:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright issue
Hi, thanks for your message on my talk page about the Gifted Education Programme (Singapore) article! I replied on the article talk page - just leaving a note here to let you know :) aoxiang 翱翔  (user)(talk) 02:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It's no problem at all! Thanks so much for your good work in keeping an eye out. I must say it was nice to have a walk down memory lane and revisit the edits I made 13 years ago (and quite amusing that something I wrote at age 11 has apparently been plagiarised in an academic journal!) Thank you again for watching out and letting me know of the issue :) aoxiang 翱翔  (user)(talk) 13:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

flagicons
Hey, WTY! Just wanted to let you know why I removed the flagicons you added -- there's information at WP:MOSFLAG! —valereee (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, valereee! Thanks for leaving the note, I appreciate. I read through the MOS and am still a bit unclear on what the reasoning is. I believe in every case listed in the international reactions section, the statements were from authoritative figures in their respective governments or organizations, so I assume it's not "Do not emphasize nationality without good reason" under inappropriate use. Would you mind clarifying for me? Thanks! WhinyTheYounger (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , in general WP prefers prose within article text. Flags are generally only used in infoboxes, lists, tables, where we're shorthanding information. In article text, we say "Canadian" instead of using the flag of Canada. The flag doesn't add any information so it's simply a meaningless and possibly distracting flourish. —valereee (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Would you say the general rule of thumb then is to restrict the flag usage to articles specifically about reactions to events per se? I was thinking of Reactions to the ROKS Cheonan sinking when I was making the changes, but I do see that that is less prosaic and more a list, and ROKS Cheonan sinking itself does not contain it. Thanks for helping me understand! WhinyTheYounger (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * WTY, personally I'd remove all the flagicons from that article, too. They're unnecessary and distracting. It's an article with few watchers, that may be why no one has suggested getting rid of the flagicons. —valereee (talk) 20:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ulanhu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Struggle ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ulanhu check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ulanhu?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

COI Question
Hello there! I am one of the users you flagged on the Eurasia Group and Ian Bremmer pages. I left a message on the Conflict of Interest noticeboard but thought I should message you here, too. First, I want to apologize. I do work for Eurasia Group and wasn't aware of Wikipedia's policy that we needed to disclose such affiliations as a conflict of interest in a user profile or edit to a page. I don't mean to make an excuse for not knowing this; I simply say it because I want you to understand there wasn't any malicious intent or effort to hide my affiliation when making these updates. While I don't know all of the other editors you mentioned on the noticeboard, two of them are current colleagues, and we sincerely want to participate in Wikipedia while adhering to its policies. To that end, I tried to add a COI declaration to my user page. I believe I did this correctly but would appreciate any feedback if I didn't. I also understand that I should disclose this COI any time I try to propose an update to either the Eurasia Group or Ian Bremmer pages going forward. I appreciate the need to avoid promotional information that reads like advertisements but also want to be sure that these pages reflect up-to-date and complete information about our company and Ian Bremmer; I'm concerned they don't at the moment. Any recommendations you have on how to achieve this end while ensuring we're adhering to Wikipedia's policies would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, and again, I am sorry. --Brianharper89 (talk) 21:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! Responded on your talk page for your easier future reference. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 00:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * Thank you!! WhinyTheYounger (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xinjiang re-education camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asylum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Bunn (exonerated prisoner)


The article John Bunn (exonerated prisoner) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to be a case of WP:BIO1E."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of John Bunn (exonerated prisoner) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Bunn (exonerated prisoner) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Bunn (exonerated prisoner) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Dyslexia
remember that articles like this one needs to have MEDRS refs--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

AfD notice
Hi. Please see this AfD following on from the RfC you commented on. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 10:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

acceptable uses of deprecated sources
Hi, I see you've left a comment here User_talk:Amigao about this. I'm now proposing a change to the guidelines here, feel free to share your opinion. Alaexis¿question? 20:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC
Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Casey Frey
Hello WhinyTheYounger,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Casey Frey for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice! I've responded on the talk page. I think there is room for discussion about notability, but I do believe baseline significance is met. Something that might be useful is the creation of a list article about modest social media celebrities about whom there exists some reliable, significant, independent coverage but whose GNG is less clear (see e.g. the three Viners I link to on the talk page). I would certainly be amenable to putting something like that together. WhinyTheYounger (WtY) (talk, contribs)  16:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Enoch Wu moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Enoch Wu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alastair Iain Johnston
Hello, WhinyTheYounger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alastair Iain Johnston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alastair Iain Johnston


Hello, WhinyTheYounger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alastair Iain Johnston".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)