User talk:Whistleblogger

Edits to Jesselyn Radack
Your edit summaries today suggest that you the subject of this bio. If so, please familiarize yourself with WP:AUTOPROB before making further such edits. Thank you. NedFausa (talk) 20:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jesselyn Radack; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NedFausa (talk) 14:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Administrators Noticeboard


A discussion about your activity on this page is being opened on the administrator's notice board.

Please refrain from editing this article, if you are the real Jesselyn Radack and please refrain from making edits which others my view as harmful to reputations, or which may be considered defamatory or libelous by the persons in question. These are called "BLP violations", as they contain material which addresses biographies of living persons.

You have also been previously warned about editwarring. Continuing this can lead to restrictions of your account.

Thank you. NEWFineyoungcannibalsNOW (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Whistleblogger. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. El_C 20:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Jesselyn Radack) for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)