User talk:Whistleinthewind

Speedy deletion of Guitar God 2001
A tag has been placed on Guitar God 2001 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dekisugi (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Other Half
A tag has been placed on Other Half requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 04:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Blue Cheer - Deletion of Trademark Dispute
Could you please explain your reason for deleting the section of the article dealing with a current dispute over the ownership of the band name. I have referenced this to a published interview with Dickie Peterson, where the problem is acknowledged.

Many thanks in advance for your consideration here.

Dreadarthur (talk) 03:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

I have restored your deletion here. Before you remove the whole complete well-sourced paragraph, please use discussion page to the other authors. Dekisugi (talk) 08:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Randy Holden
Please stop reverting the intro to a long and incomplete sentence! BeastmasterGeneral 13:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Could you please not to add unsourced materials for a living person's biography? That violates WP:BLP policy. I reverted your edit and consider this as a warning. Dekisugi (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dekisugi (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dekisugi (talk) 07:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet warning
Look, I know you're using another anon user: to do the same behaviour as you did. Consider this as my warning for your sockpuppetry. The next time you or your socks make another vandalism, I'll report you to get blocked for all your accounts. Dekisugi (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Further on Blue Cheer Trademark Dispute
Could you please provide independent references for your comments. Have you been interviewed on this? Are there any publicly-available court documents or other articles to which reference can be made? My clear understanding is that personal recollection is not permitted on Wikipedia, based on concerns about it turning into an "I said - He said" debate, where there is no independent documentation apart from the Wikipedia comments.

Dreadarthur (talk) 15:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I have reframed your recent edits in relation to the trademark dispute as personal commentary, which I hope seems fair under the circumstances.

Dreadarthur (talk) 22:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)