User talk:WhiteStar2000/Archive/2

Article issues

 * Hello, You apparently made some edits to L. V. Locsin Building and appear to be a principal contributor. Providing a source is a good thing to affect the removal of tags. An area of concern is that this article, as well as several others, are sourced using single primary sources. The articles survived AFD by "ONLY" a "procedural close" because mass AFD's are generally frowned upon. Other issues were not dealt with and since WP:notability is not advanced by primary sources the issue of single sourcing that can be considered non-independent of the subject, could result in more nominations. The original nominator could have immediately gone this route, as echoed by consensus and the closing, so additional reliable sources would be prudent.


 * When making edits that address tags, and these improvements cause or result in situations actually calling for a different or degraded tag, replacement with a proper tag is important and not unreasonable. Maintenance tags place articles in certain categories and are not a "wall of shame". I will be adding relevant tags and if you wish to make changes identified then please remove the tags. Otr500 (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shang Salcedo Place
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. UnitedPhilippines, thanks for creating Shang Salcedo Place! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand, if possible. Thanks. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Baby miss fortune 13:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lepanto Building
The article Lepanto Building has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable standard building, fails WP:GEOFEAT." While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

UTRS
--UTRSBot (talk) 03:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Message to User:Bbb23
First of all, I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia before the year 2018 ends because I want to edit and create more pages in this website. If you will unblock me, I will be a good and nice contributor from now on. I will edit pages that are unsourced and articles that does not cite any references and I will not make multiple accounts anymore in Wikipedia. I move that the block is no longer necessary because I realize that sockpuppetry is illegal and prohibited by the laws that are imposed in Wikipedia. I admit my mistakes as a contributor and I will change myself from now on. I will commit that I will make useful contributions in this website from now on if I am unblocked. If you will not unblock me, I would rather to leave Wikipedia instead. My former sockpuppet account User:MagicJulius will no longer active. Thank you and have a good day. UnitedPhilippines (talk) 12:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You stated previously that you would not appeal your block any further. The above statement directly contradicts this. Your best and only hope is WP:SO, which requires six months with zero edits. Even then, you'll have to demonstrate substantially more honesty and understanding of our policies, when requesting an unblock. Reminder: zero edits, for at least six months. Zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for reminder. I will commit that I will wait and will not edit for six months starting today, May 4 until November 4, 2018 and I will appeal my block after six months. Thank you and have a good day.

This user violated that promise via. --Yamla (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry and I will commit that I will not edit in English Wikipedia for more than 6 months. I am so excited to edit again but my excitement became a nonsense excitement. I will not violate any rules in this website. I will also add that I will no longer make sockpuppet accounts anymore. Thank you and have a good day. UnitedPhilippines (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You've demonstrated we can't trust your word. You have now violated WP:3STRIKES and are banned by the community. WP:SO is no longer available to you. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

I have a question, how can I appeal my ban from English Wikipedia? Thanks.UnitedPhilippines (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Competence is required. I'm revoking talk page access because you no longer have a place here. --Yamla (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

You tried to appeal your case. No. Obviously not. You clearly understood that you had to make zero edits for six months, clearly agreed to do so, and then broke your word. You set up an account to evade your block. You've shown, over and over again, that we can't trust you. That's it, that's the end of the line. Don't email me again. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Response to your email
You have been given multiple opportunities to show that you understand why you were blocked, and did not do so. You repeatedly said that you would not edit for six months, but did so, attempting to hide the fact that you doing so. You said that you would no longer appeal your block, but did so. Your talk page access was removed to prevent you wasting any more administrator time with your pointless unblock requests, and you then tried to do so by email instead of by talk page posts. I shall remove your email access.I shall make a note to restore your talk page access in six months, and if you are lucky I shall see that note and follow it up: if so you may appeal your ban, though unless you do so in a very different way from anything you have done up to now your chance of success is likely to be none. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 05:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

2019
You've repeatedly made promises in the past and then immediately broken those promises. You've repeatedly lied in the past. We aren't talking a long time ago, we are talking May of 2018. What's changed? What specifically has changed between then and now, such that we can now trust your word? Also, is it your intention to only edit the Tagalog Wikipedia, as you imply in your request, or do you wish to edit the English Wikipedia, too? You did not address why you violated WP:SOCK in the past, nor your history of inappropriate editing. I strongly advise you to change your request to address these specific points. Finally, are you asking to be unbanned? You haven't asked that your request be copied over to the appropriate discussion board for community discussion. --Yamla (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

You'll also want to address your abuse of the email feature while you were banned. --Yamla (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

"I want to answer the question why I violated WP:SOCK in the past. The answer is because I created three other sockpuppet accounts that I mention here." That indicates only that you did violate WP:SOCK, not why. Nor why we should trust you not to violate it in the future. Nor have you addressed your abuse of the email feature or why we should trust your word now, given your history of breaking it. Nor have you addressed your inappropriate edits in the past. Finally, one unban request at a time. Posting multiple unban requests makes it hard to determine which one you want copied over. --Yamla (talk) 12:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

You now have three unblock/unban requests. Join them into one and I'll copy them over to the noticeboard. I won't endorse unbanning you, but I'll start the process to have your ban reviewed. --Yamla (talk) 13:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

STOP IT. You now have four open unblock requests. One. ONE. ONE UNBLOCK REQUEST, NOT FOUR. ONE UNBLOCK REQUEST. WP:CIR applies here and if your next edit is not to reduce the number of unblock requests from four to one, I will revoke your access to this page. ONE UNBLOCK REQUEST. --Yamla (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

You have refused to follow the instructions provided, and have refused to answer the questions I asked. Are you absolutely sure you want the above copied over to a discussion board? Or would you like to go back, follow the instructions, and answer the questions asked? --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 08:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion
This user engaged in block evasion as in January, 2019. Note that WowMagic18 was already blocked, so the user was only able to edit their talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 13:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

July 3, 2019
--UTRSBot (talk) 10:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

unblock appeal, CBAN
Carry to community? Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the following accounts as ✅ (the last three are sleepers):
 * The user has also evaded their block with at least one IP.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, bang goes this application.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed talk page access-- again. Please do not request unblock via WP:UTRS for six months. The usual remedies listed at WP:GAB remain.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The user has also evaded their block with at least one IP.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, bang goes this application.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed talk page access-- again. Please do not request unblock via WP:UTRS for six months. The usual remedies listed at WP:GAB remain.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed talk page access-- again. Please do not request unblock via WP:UTRS for six months. The usual remedies listed at WP:GAB remain.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ramon Magsaysay Center in early 1980s.jpg


The file File:Ramon Magsaysay Center in early 1980s.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30226
-- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 08:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Before I carry this to WP:AN, -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 08:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Based on the limited data I have access to, I can't see recent evidence of any socking in the CU results. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I should like to carry CBAN appeal to WP:AN if that's OK. MagicJulius00, assuming it is OK, please let us know here when you are ready to respond. I have restored TPA. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for restoring my TPA. I am now ready to respond on the future comments here. User:MagicJulius00 08:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


 * My pleasure carrying over. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I just want to say that I have many realizations after I have blocked and banned. Also, I cannot leave Wikipedia because I contribute on the other projects that are connected with English Wikipedia. I propose that if I will be unblocked and unbanned, I will edit more articles as I can, put references and sources there, will not do any vandalism, and will ask for assistance or help from other users if needed. Also, I will not do any sockpuppetry again. It became too late for me to understand why I became a banned and blocked user but now I fully understand and have reflected on my wrongdoings in the past. [I want this be inserted in WP:AN.] 23:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! 07:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I have just closed your appeal as successful and I have unblocked you. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Foxnpichu (talk) 22:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

By the way, where can I appeal my ban? Thank you (aka DQ)! Can I edit my username? 10:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)