User talk:Whiteknight2999

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Same-sex marriage was changed by Whiteknight2999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955356 on 2012-11-26T02:41:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Warning
Replacing an article with two Bible verses is considered vandalism. If you continue you will be blocked indefinitely. User:Fred Bauder Talk 02:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC) {{unblock|this is my only account and it need to be unblocked just because im unable to post what i think is fair should not be a reason to block me

{{unblock reviewed|Single owner of single account No sock puppetry here now unblock me|decline=No. Not with edits like that. --jpgordon{{sup| :==( o ) }} 15:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1= Single account Single owner and i just posted what i see as the truth i am asking unblock me | decline=If your intent is to continue to post "the truth" as you see it, then unblocking you would be a poor choice. Kuru  (talk)  04:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed| I was warned by one admin andthen i was blocked for sock puppetry not anything else i assure you i am the only one using this account and it is my only account and i dont think it fair that i was blocked by one admin after my FIRST warning when i did nothing else look at my posts and my talk Whiteknight2999 (talk) 07:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC) }}
 * decline=Socks are blocked on sight, no warnings needed. And you [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&diff=prev&oldid=524891772 behaved] exactly like Brucejenner. Max Semenik (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

This blocked user ( [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:Whiteknight2999}} block log] | [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=search&ip=Whiteknight2999}} active blocks] | autoblocks | [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=unblock&ip=Whiteknight2999}} unblock] | contribs | deleted contribs | [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser=Whiteknight2999}} abuse log] ) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

{{blockquote|text=Ok well then ill just make another account Due to the fact that i have no idea who this Brucejenner is and i dont really care it seems to be bullshit that so few have power to decide what so many can do Whiteknight2999}} {{blockquote|text=Threatening further sockpuppetry and sending abusive emails has lost you talkpage and email access. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)}}
 * Request reason
 * Revoke reason