User talk:Whiteorchide

June 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wilson Miao, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Apologies - i will be adding a source but am new to this Whiteorchide (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

As user Bbb23 said, Stop disruptive editing. I see that you have been warned before and yet you seem to want to continue your vandalism and poor sourcing on the Taleeb Noomohamed page.NiceTryEarl (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * What you say is untrue. First, Whiteorchide did not "continue" anything. They haven't edited since my warning. Second, what they did on the Noomohamed page was not vandalism. If it had been, I would have reverted it myself, and I didn't touch it. Finally, you should not be editing the Noohomaed article at all because of your conflict of interest, which you've been warned about before.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This user was chided by you for the same reason their content was removed from the Noormohamed page - simply stating 'x is not true' as this user did before removing content is not a beneficial contribution. Besides which, that claim - that Trudeau appeared with Noormohamed during any of his campaign stops in the Lower Mainland  - is false. Period. Full stop. AFAIC removing pertinent, accurate, sourced content is vandalism.
 * I do not have nor have I been warned about 'a conflict of interest' by any user who is not actually either Noormohamed (RyanChang2010) or one of his associates, which includes random IP addresses and MAC addresses that are always defending a real estate speculating, house flipping politician.
 * Here's what Walter Gorlitz said on April 15,2022 at 20:54: "To his (Noormohameds) paid editors: stop removing content from this article."
 * Were you to actually understand the issue, you'd know that the content I contributed was removed because too much detail was provided about a specific campaign (WP: UNDUE) or too much info on specific criticisms (why is flipping contentious?) not because it was incorrect or biased.
 * Here's WildComet (on content I've provided): "I tend to think the details of these "flipping" criticisms are relevant and appropriate to include..."
 * Is this clearer to you now?
 * If you have anything to communicate to *me*, or any intelligent and thoughtful assistance or advice, you can provide it on *my* page, not another editors, as I doubt that hurling accusations at other editors on a different users page is standard or respected practice at Wikipedia.
 * You should know better. Do better. NiceTryEarl (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You should know better. Do better. NiceTryEarl (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)