User talk:Whitepixels

Emil Bömches
Hi. You need to provide the source in the article. Currently, the article does not support the claims you are making.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 12:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

What would be the source in this case? Is a photo of the crypt appropriate? Whitepixels (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Yep, that should be fine, as long as it's not hosted on a site such as a blog, Facebook, etc. If the place of burial has a website with it on, that would be ideal. Or a website that sources the dates too. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 12:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I made a photo myself (penultimate row on the right). I don't know if this classifies as verifiable or not, but I doubt anyone can get a better source than this. Unfortunately the cemetery has no website or similar. Location is N45.648, E25.590, public access allowed. Best regards, Whitepixels (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Brilliant! I've updated the article and put the image into it. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 15:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Asprin
Hi Whitepixels. I have reverted your change to Asprin back to a redirect for the drug aspirin. This has been discussed many times in the past, including in a request for discussion (RFD) and the outcome was to redirect to the drug. The vast, vast majority of people would be searching for (and mis-spelling) the drug, and a surname alone is not enough to redirect to a specific full name page unless that surname is unique and widely known. This is not "offensive" as you have described it. Please do not revert this change again without a further RFD. --AtomCrusher (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * A point of note: You may wish to add a hatnote to the aspirin article if you feel strongly about this. It can then be up to the editors of that article to determine its relevance. --AtomCrusher (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, no problem. I'm not really active on the English wiki, so I don't feel strongly (or in any way) about this. I just thought to help out, as I though it was a joke or something. If this was voted on, then it's OK with me. What I found "offensive" was the assumption of "you're too stupid to spell a 7-letter word correctly." Best regards, Whitepixels (talk) 15:30, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)