User talk:Whiteworks2

Plymouth airport
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Nilfanion (talk) 21:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nilfanion (talk) 23:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Nilfanion (talk) 23:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway2 | Talk 08:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Robert Lenkiewicz
Re this edit. Read the policy on Verifiability:

"any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed".

Personally I also think Lenkiewicz was a pretentious overrated twat, but we are not allowed to include statements that aren't backed up by reliable sources. Gordonofcartoon 20:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Your editing practices
Some of your edits are constructive and add significant value to articles relating to Plymouth and other parts of the South-West. Please read these pages on disruptive and tendentious editing. The fact you are refusing to communicate with other editors of these pages, despite repeated messages here, makes the problems far harder to resolve. If your editing practices, continue I will likely file a Request for comment on your actions.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Ivybridge Community College
Hi I've been looking at older revision of the article and I think that it was you who put "The school has aroused controversy by its attitude to some prospective entrants. South Hams children who pass the optional 11 plus but not high enough to get a place at one of the Plymouth grammar schools will be unlikely to be admitted to Ivybridge." The article lacks references and is in danger of deletion, so you need to find a source that backs up your point and reference it in the article. If you're unsure about how to do this then just put the link onto my talk page. Remember that the link must be to the exact page that backs up your point; not just the website itself. Bsrboy 00:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)