User talk:Whitmanjohnathan

Bionumbers
A tag has been placed on Bionumbers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Bionumbers and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I've done some cleanup to the article. However, what's critically missing from the article is coverage of the website in independent reliable sources. The general notability criterion is that a subject has gotten significant coverage that way. If you can provide links to, say, a writeup in a magazine like Discover or some newspaper articles, that would help cement that the site is notable and the article should stay on Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 13:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bionumbers
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bionumbers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Bionumbers. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)