User talk:Whizzgo

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Whizzgo has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfacebook\.com (links: http://www.facebook.com/wall.php?id=220143685528#/group.php?gid=220143685528&ref=nf). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The information you want to add may indeed be notable, but you'll need to cite the newspaper coverage, not just a facebook group. Go find a better source, phrase it in a more neutral way (try not to sound like a disgruntled customer out to harm them), and there'll be no problem. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No, you can't get around the problem by putting your preferred version of the article here- if you want that information in the article, though, all you need to do is find a better source. Thanks! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Maybe you misunderstood my earlier note? No, you really aren't allowed to add unverified information to encyclopedia articles; if there isn't a reliable source for the information, then the encyclopedia doesn't publish the information. I hope you'll stop, because I'd be really sad if I had to block you from editing simply because you were new and misunderstood the rules. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. The source you cited does not confirm any of the facts you are trying to add, other than the fact that the company reorganized. In fact, it contradicts some of your claims- you say that the company has the same staff, while the article you cite says that Charlotte Morton is the only director of the original company who is still directing the new company. The article you cite says nothing at all about the refunding of deposits or about the significance of a Facebook group, both of which seem to be of great significance in the paragraph you wrote. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)