User talk:Whoagottahavetruth

January 2015
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Corona del Mar High School— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * It is recommended that you do not add anything relating to yourself to article space, and it is expressly forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote anything about yourself or anything you're connected to.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
 * We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.
 * Assume good faith as much as reasonably possible, and then about half-way past the border for unreasonable possibility. -- Your post at User_talk:Wtmitchell, particularly the "who are you?" was a touch hostile.

Also, I have reverted this edit because the source cited does not describe the CdM-OC connection as a rumor, and does not mention the other school. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)