User talk:Whoop whoop pull up/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia!
- Welcome-

Thanks, Brambleclawx! Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 01:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Flight 103
Why did someone redirect "Flight 103" to Pan Am Flight 103? It isn't too hard to type "Pan Am 103" or simply "PA103." Also, it was not redirected "back to the primary topic," as per one editor's comment, but redirected there for the first time (t previously wasn't even an article, let alone a redirect.)

ATP
Trust me, I checked this. I also thought to make ATP redirect to Adenosine triphosphate. There were about 500 pages using ATP directly so I could easily check. And no, to my amazement about 200 of them were to Association of Tennis Professionals and 50ish were to All Tomorrow's Parties (music festival). There just isn't justification for it. --Muhandes (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

That still makes the greatest number to Adenosine triphosphate, and that is also likely to be the most familiar to readers, as well as the most often looked for. And that is the only thing ATP stands for, so it should go to Adenosine triphosphate, with a separate ATP (disambiguation) page. Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 01:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * No, I'm afraid that's not how it works, see WP:PT. A subject has to be "much more likely than any other, and more likely than all the others combined" to be primary, and as you can see, it isn't. (also, obviously what you said "that is the only thing ATP stands for" is incorrect. The whole idea of the dab page is that ATP stands for all the other meanings as well. I'm no tennis fan myself, but for tennis fans ATP stands for Association of Tennis Professionals. I'm not much of a music fan either, but it seems like All Tomorrow's Parties (music festival) is very big for some music fans) --Muhandes (talk) 01:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, so that's how it is? Well, sor—ry!

Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * No harm done, and I fell for exactly the same thing, if not with this page than with another, before I learned the rule. Best regards, and happy editing! --Muhandes (talk) 01:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * 'Bye! --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 01:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm surprised too. I'd think ATP would be best known as Adenosine triphosphate. Wow.  Bramble  claw  x   01:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow. --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 01:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Nice to see a new user who has a chemical expertise. COT2- would make a welcome contribution to the COT article. If you are thinking of creating an article on the anion, then I recommend that you shift the topic slightly to a real compound, which are more readily described with a "chembox" (not used for charged species). I would expect that there really is not COT2- except inside a mass spectrometer, and the alkali metal derivatives would be significantly covalent, akin to organolithium compounds. If you want some advice, there is a project page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals where some folks with a lot of chemical knowledge can help. So ask.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you add defamatory content once again, as you did to Bad Romance, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tb hotch < Ta lk C. 21:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

How was adding the Annoying Orange link "defamatory"? --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 20:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Ununseptium
Hi there. I noticed you moved the Ununseptium page to Ununseptine. The article itself notes that all newly-discovered elements should end in -ium, even if they're in the halogen or noble gas group. On what basis did you decide to move this, given the IUPAC recommendation that "For linguistic consistency, the names of all new elements should end in “-ium”."? This is really the sort of thing that should be discussed on the talk page first. 28bytes (talk) 22:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

The Annoying Orange episodes
Plase, note that The Annoying Orange episodes have no notability to be included at Wikipedia. Articles on episodes normally do not include details about what each character has said. The best thing to do is to create a list of episodes, instead of many short, unencyclopedic pages. Victão Lopes I hear you... 00:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * They are no less notable than episodes of The Simpsons. If you are right, we might as well delete all the articles on the individual Simpsons episodes. --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 00:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jimbo Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You should know better  — Soap  —  19:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * How was writing that he was the Leader of Wikipedia "unconstructive"? --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Emperor Norton Succession Box
Please note that you are in violation of the Three Revision Rule. It is absurd to put a succession box on the Emperor Norton article, as he wasn't really an Emperor, he didn't have a precursor or a successor. Wikipedia is not (normally) a joke, so please desist from adding the successor box to this article. --Paul (talk) 00:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at user talk:Jimbo Wales, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Seriously, you were close to a block earlier and we decided to give you another chance. This is really your last warning.  — Soap''  —  17:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not one of your 395 edits to date has been unambiguously useful and you seem intent on annoying people rather than contributing to an encyclopaedia. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I did not realize that I was not being helpful. D-: --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Please please pretty please? I promise to never try to vandalize Wikipedia again.  Please please PLEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAASE? —sniff— --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Ignore my earlier comments. In your opinion, what Wikipedia policies should I learn more about? --Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 18:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

--Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Several examples please of the problems you see and why. Dougweller (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)


 * 1. I didn't realize that Norton was actually never emperor. 2. I forgot that it isn't April Fools' Day when I posted that comment on Jimbo Wales' talk page.  3. I did not realize that adding a link to The Annoying Orange from Bad Romance was defamatory content. --Whoop whoop pull up (talk)


 * Hellooo? Where have you gone, Dougweller? --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 17:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I expected you to add a new unblock template. I'll let someone else decide. Dougweller (talk) 19:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 21:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Look, I asked Dougweller. He asked for "several examples please of the problems you see and why."  I gave him some examples.  He said he expected me to add a new unblock template.  I did exactly that—and then YOU came along and !@$%*&^!@#$)&!*%%&^!@#$<>?{":~?!  So just lay off me, will ya?  And this time I WILL add a new unblock template, for him (Dougweller) to answer only! --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 14:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I've fixed your unblock template, but I'm not convinced so I'm leaving it to others, if another Admin wants to unblock you, fine. Dougweller (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Huh. Do you think the Emperor Norton dispute should go on Lamest edit wars? --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 18:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Movie
I moved your movie III to my userspace just in case an admin decided to delete it since you were blocked. If you'd like to tell me about what you'd like to see in the scenes, I'l be looking here. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)