User talk:Whoop whoop pull up/Archive 2



Wikipedia:NAZI listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NAZI. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:NAZI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Beeblebrox (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

FAC
Please read the instructions at WP:FAC and refrain from nominating articles without consulting with significant contributors. Featured article candidates/Juno (film)/archive1. Thank you, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 16:44, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, dammit. --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 16:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Userbox
Just so you know, I moved your userbox into your userspace (you used a slash instead of a colon in the title). You can find it at User:Whoop whoop pull up/Nortonian dynasty userbox. --Slon02 (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks. :D --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 22:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Could you please explain why you've edited my last edit to Uncontrolled decompression. Thanks Socrates2008 ( Talk ) 09:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh. The thing is, it didn't quite fit in the table, and the whole thing is explained in the external link below, so I just cut out all the unnecessary detail to get back to the basics. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 09:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!
Thanks! :-D Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 00:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Cut it out
The reference desk is for legitimate questions. It is not a playground. I'm quite certain we had a previous discussion about you showing some maturity if you wish to continue editing here. The ref desk is not simply a place to satisfy your idle curiosity about every conceivable situation, especially a question like your last one. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry. The thing is, I really was wondering what would happen in that case - I certainly didn't think that it would be deleted as vandalism. :'-( Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The Reference Desk has a talk page (click Discussion at the top of any Reference Desk page). (Personal attack removed) -- k a i n a w &trade; 19:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Quit with the personal attacks! >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * My comment is a personal attack if and only if this user actually does not have the capability to comprehend the difference between a real question and vandalism. By claiming that is a personal attack, this user is claiming that he/she cannot comprehend the difference between a real question and vandalism and, therefore, should not be given the freedom to use Wikipedia's Reference Desk without proper supervision. I have no problem with that. -- k a i n a w &trade; 19:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Even in that case, calling me "mentally retarded" would STILL be a personal attack, because it makes a derogatory and blatantly false comment about me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( >:-( Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:40, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * This isn't kindergarten. You don't get a smiley sticker no matter how far you color outside the lines. Either you agree that you that do comprehend the difference between a real question and vandalism and that you are not a user that I would classify as mentally retarded OR you agree that you do not comprehend the difference between a real question and vandalism and that you the type of user that I attacked by calling mentally retarded. -- k a i n a w &trade; 19:43, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I DO comprehend the difference (I just needed a little help, thank you Beebles) and am NOT the kind of user that you would classify as mentally retarded, but you CALLED me mentally retarded even though I am not, thus qualifying as a personal attack. And may I remind you that YOU are the one who escalated this situation with your comment containing the now-removed personal attack. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * It appears that the issue is your comprehension of the word if. -- k a i n a w &trade; 19:48, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The issue is your incorrect usage of the word. Look at your own talk page. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * And as Beebles says, it is never OK in any case - see this page. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 19:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

(ec with above) You've also been asking lots of questions about Mt. Everest. The thing is, many of the questions you ask could be easily answered if you just read the article on Mt. Everest. There is section on what lives there and another on the survivability of high altitudes. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC) I

Welcome
 Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

/* Living on Mount Everest */
don't miss the latest answer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2011_September_25#Living_on_Mount_Everest μηδείς (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 20:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

HELP!
How do I stop http://text-enhance.com/ from advertising through random words on Wikipedia? Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 12:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Report it to the WP:BLACKLIST.  mabdul 12:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The problem is, the links are apparently random, change every time you reload the page, and do not show up in the page history - see Main Page and Battle of Gonzales.
 * Sry, but three things (although this might sound stupid):

 mabdul 13:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * are you on the correct page?
 * check your address bar of your web browser and check if there is either http://secure.wikimedia.org/... or http://en.wikipedia.org/... as address
 * check if your PC is free from adware, trojan horses, and viruses

I would think you just go to http://text-enhance.com/ and click the click here link that's clearly on that page. 92.4.169.13 (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I did that... but does anyone else have a problem with it advertising on random words of random articles? Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 14:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Again, Wikipedia is not using any advertisement and thus you shouldn't see any. If you see any, then it is either a donation banner, you are not on Wikipedia (see my advise with the address bad) or you have a computer with problems (like adware). Please read WP:REUSE why there are tons of pages out there using the content of Wikipedia (the most famous may be facebook).  mabdul 15:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit Notice
Yes my edit notice was based on yours! I apologise for not telling you and don't intend any violation! I thought the idea was cool and thought your design was great! Thank you for the cookie as well!!! Jacsam2 (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * d(^_^)b Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 20:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * This is kind of random, but how do you make the SHA Commitment? I have been searching Wikipedia for a long time and can't find out how!!! Jacsam2 (talk) 01:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Try here or here. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much!!! Jacsam2 (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Do please sign your posts, Jacsam. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 23:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops sorry.....Jacsam2 (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Third Opinion
Hi again! Myself and other editors are in conflict over some of my edits at this page. Do you think you could give a new third opinion? Thank you it is much appreciated! Jacsam2 (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have done so - hope it helps! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 14:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I didnt give any examples of the conflict material, I can link to some if you would like to view them! Jacsam2 (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! (October 2011)

 * :-) Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 18:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Campaign Box
Great idea. Here's a for you! --S. Rich (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:38, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There are editors who promote a "Second Korean War" theme. Along the same lines, some say the Korean War never technically/legally ended. Very little reputable scholarship supports either idea. What I hope to avoid is material which supports either idea. So the nuisance of the box you created is quite important. Enjoy the cookie. --S. Rich (talk) 01:54, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia movies
Hi, would you mind taking over the "Wikipedian 1" role (formerly Pa-231) in movies 2, 3 and 4? I don't want that role anymore, but as it's a pretty major one...? Double sharp (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC) (formerly Pa-231)
 * OK! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 13:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll change the name when I have time unless you want to do it yourself. Double sharp (talk) 06:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What happened to Protactinium-231 anyway? Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 15:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I used to have that username, if you were asking about what happened to the user. Double sharp (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then, why'd you change it? Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 15:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Personal preference. Double sharp (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Gracias. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 03:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Helium-2
Hi. Re your edits today on Isotopes of helium, could you please provide a source for the claim that positron emission 2He → 2H has been observed. As I have explained on Talk:Isotopes of helium, beta decays are so much slower than the claimed half-life of 2He that this decay should not really be observable.

I would also like to ask if you know the source of the half-life value of 2He inserted on 5 Nov 2011 by a numbered editor. 3 x 10-27 s is really too short to be possible, since it corresponds to the protons flying apart at 1000 times the speed of light (for a nuclear distance of 10-15 m).

There is no listing for 2He in the general references (NUBASE etc.) provided for the table. Please reply at Talk:Isotopes of helium. Thanks. Dirac66 (talk) 02:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

RE. Anti-Columbus userboxes
No he didn't. Commanders of armies caused the murders. Columbus simply found the continent. Vought109 (talk) 00:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Columbus caused the first murders, set the precedent for later murders, and did NOT discover the continent. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 00:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, Columbus wan't the first to discover the continent. But saying that he caused the murder of ten million native americans would be like prosecuting a serial killer's parents for raising a child who would grow up to be a serial killer. Columbus' men may have killed several indians but he certainly did not murder 10,000,000 of them. Vought109 (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He set the precedent. If he hadn't started the murders, they would have been much less common as conquistadores worried about breaking the precedent. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 00:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you have any references to prove your theory right? Vought109 (talk) 00:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He did set the precedent. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 00:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Again, all you have is a theory, not any actual evidence to prove that he set the 'precedent.' Vought109 (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He was the first to murder them. Who else would have set the precedent?
 * And a theory is generally accepted as fact. Thank you for calling it a theory. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 00:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ask any philosopher or scientist and they will tell you that a theory is never a fact until it has been reasonably proven, which you have failed to do so far. Vought109 (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ask any scientist and they will tell you that a theory is a hypothesis which is generally accepted as fact. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your figure of how 10,000,000 native americans were murdered is misleading. A sizeable chunk of that figure were killed during legitimate warefare with Europeans, such as Red Cloud's War. Whereas another sizeable chunk of that figure were killed fighting against each other when they alligned with foreign powers, such as the French and Indian War. Vought109 (talk) 01:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Shut up, leave me alone and respect my opinion. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, I am respecting your opinion. Vought109 (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Then thank you! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am merely saying that nobody deserves a damnatio memoriae no matter how 'evil' he or she was. Because as George Santayana said: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." Vought109 (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Calling Columbus "worse than Stalin" has to be seen as satirical. Stalin murdered 6 million of his countrymen. Columbus at his worst couldn't imagine those kind of numbers. You have to see the satire and irony behind the editor's userboxes. (The fact he calls them "userboxen" is a clue.) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If he was trying to be satirical he could have said so upfront. Instead, he continued to argue with his unproven theory. Calling someone evil and saying that person murdered 10,000,000 people is not satirical. OKelly (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really matter. Whatever Columbus might or might not have done was 500 years ago, and it's merely water under the bridge of the Santa Maria. If the editor wants to fantasize that Columbus was a mass-murderer, there's no harm. And if he actually believes it, there's still no harm, other than it making him look like an ignoranimus. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 09:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I thought you were done making personal attacks? Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 11:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What personal attack? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I highly doubt that calling someone an "ignoramus" (which you even misspelled) could be counted as anything but a personal attack. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 11:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I said it makes you look like an ignoranimus, which is not the same thing as saying you are one. P.S. "Ignoranimus" is an inside joke, a Bugs Bunny catch-phrase. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed, thanks for your common sense. OKelly (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Whoop whoop pull up, stop thinking that every criticism against you is apersonal attack. Baseball bugs was merely trying to diffuse the tension. OKelly (talk) 05:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The editor is clearly astute on a number of subjects. Maybe Columbus just isn't one of them. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Query
It is what? Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * An element. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 00:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Reliable reference for neutronium = element? Said by what international body? Materialscientist (talk) 00:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * When Andreas von Antropoff coined the word "neutronium" in 1926, he used to refer to the "element of atomic number zero" (my emphasis). Also, the Chemical Galaxy and many other spiral versions of the periodic table include it as element number zero.  And it is commonly used to refer to an element composed solely of neutrons. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The "established" and/or "reliable" parts are missing, as summarized in neutronium. I would rather think of it as a hypothetical state of matter. Materialscientist (talk) 02:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent changes to Template:Compact periodic table
Both conventions for the transition metals (groups 3 to 11 or groups 3 to 12) are widespread and IUPAC allows both. (Source: .) If you are using the group 3 to 11 definition, I would think that one Hg compound produced at extreme conditions is not really enough to move it to the transition metals. (W. B. Jensen agrees: .) We still call the noble gases "noble gases" even though they can react. It is not completely certain that Uuq is a noble gas. There were similar reports for Cn, but it is actually a transition metal. Double sharp (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Exactly one compound is greater than exactly none. There is only one compound of gold(V), but does that make that particular oxidation state not exist?  And mercury(IV) fluoride has been shown to truly be mercury(IV) fluoride, with true (IV) oxidation state activity, so should it be thrown out on the sole basis of being unique and hard to synthesise?  I should think not! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 03:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It does not really matter as Wikipedia uses the group 3 to 12 definition (as IUPAC allows both). However, treating HgF4 as an exception to the normal chemistry of mercury is not the same as denying its existence. Also, you changed Lu and Lr from the lanthanides and actinides to transition metals. However, Lu and Lr are defined as lanthanides and actinides by IUPAC (, page 63 in the PDF, but page 51 by the page numbers). "Transition metal" is defined by IUPAC as group 3 to 12 elements (sometimes not including group 12), but which elements are in group 3 is disputed, so I think we should leave well enough alone. Double sharp (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your changes at Template:Compact extended periodic table have also been reverted. Inserting the g-block makes the table too wide. We do not colour astatine as a metalloid in Template:Compact periodic table, and it is instead coloured as a halogen. Neither should the chemical series information for the heavy halogens and noble gases be changed. Double sharp (talk) 12:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You appear to have made your changes again at Template:Compact extended periodic table. I've already explained this to you above and I will revert such changes in future. Please do not change Lu/Lr and their column to transition metals and Zn and Cd to post-transition metals unless you get a consensus to do so (which seems unlikely, considering what the former issue resulted in years ago). Double sharp (talk) 08:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.


 * Thanx! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 02:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Molecular shapes
Hello. I've reverted all your changes to the molecular shapes articles again. The effect was to move the TOC and lead section to a position in the centre of the page where they floated, leaving a large blank space beneath the picture you had inserted. I have no objection to you adding illustrations of molecules with these geometries to the articles, but please consider the page layout first. I refer you to the style manual:


 * Do not place images on the left at the start of any section or subsection. Images on the left must be placed somewhere after the first paragraph.

Thanks, Chris (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Uue as an alkali metal
Please note that Ununennium is not known to be an alkali metal. Due to relativistic effects, it may be somewhere completely different, similar to how Ununquadium is possibly a noble gas instead of an other metal, and how Ununoctium is probably not a noble gas. Please seek consensus before changing stuff like this in the future. Thank you. StringTheory11 04:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, then don't list ununseptium as a halogen! Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 10:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * On all periodic tables we have here, we try to list Mt-Rg, and Uut and beyond as unknown chemical properties. Please tell me where Uus is listed as a halogen and I will fix it. StringTheory11 15:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If you were referring to the halogen article, Uus has been removed. Double sharp (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2012‎ (UTC)

Nerveagentase
Found an interesting reference that hints what you suggest might be more feasible than I thought. Wnt (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That doesn't seem like a very good reference.  Uhlan  talk  21:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Use of the Ref Desk
I'm a bit concerned by the number of questions that you're posting at the Science Ref Desk; the amount of traffic that you're generating may be so much as to drown out the questions of other editors. I've opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk about how or if your participation might be modified to avoid overwhelming the Desks with your own interests and questions. TenOfAllTrades(talk)
 * You might want to consider other question and answer sites, like WikiAnswers, Answerbag and Yahoo Answers. RD is not set up as a high-volume Q&A site. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 12:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox neutronium
Template:Infobox neutronium has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Helium compounds
Template:Helium compounds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Bypassing redirects
Hi. Edits like this aren't helpful. Please see wp:notbroken. Killiondude (talk) 03:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Helionum
Google Scholar finds two mentions of helionium, both referring to anti-protonic 3He (I was in error in reading it as 4He). Google Books finds one mention of helionum, again referring to anti-protonic 3He. A general Google search, once one eliminates the youtube user account, and copies of Wikipedia, finds one ArXiv article, possibly not independent of the relevant chapter of the book, also referring to anti-protonic 3He. I see no evidence that helionium refers to the helium hydride ion. Lavateraguy (talk) 10:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, it's also questionable as to whether the hydrohelium cation falls within the spirit of the onium compound page. The other cations occur, at least in substituted form, as cations in ionic compounds. The hydrohelium cation isn't known to do so. (It's only known from low density environments.) Lavateraguy (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Zombie articles
Hi - You recently participated in a move proposal discussion regarding articles about zombies and zombie pop culture archived at Talk:Zombie. That proposal was not approved, and a new discussion is taking place at Talk:Zombie (fictional) that is narrower in scope, and concerns only whether the older Voodoo and newer Romero zombie pop culture should be included in the same article or whether it should be separated. These are articles that receive a lot of hits, and should probably get more input than just the two editors having the current discussion. I'm flagging all old move discussion participants regarding the new discussion, and your input would be appreciated. LaTeeDa (talk) 21:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia III: Revenge of Jimbo
The third Wikipedia movie is unfinished, and I would like to finish it. I have been adding a few scenes, but that is not enough. Since you are the primary writer of the third movie, I kindly ask you to continue adding to it until we reach an end. Thank you for your consideration.  Brambleberry, RiverClan Medicine Cat  Visit ♠ Follow 23:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * OK. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 01:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Xenon compounds
Template:Xenon compounds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Advice on page formatting for a USERBOX?
Because who can resist a userbox?? Well... I mean, probably lots of people... but not you!!

I'm sure I will figure it out eventually... but I don't know what's going on with my page, or why it doesn't fall neatly into sections. Do I need to use different formatting on user pages than in regular articles?

Also, a thought just occurred to me, previously I saw formatting issues on this monitor at work, but not on others. I wonder if this is the same issue, and the hour I just spent was wasted. Well, I'll delete this shortly if my pages displays correctly on another computer. Anyway, here is the tantalizing barnstorm reward for you.

Category:Humorous userboxes

Dr.queso =  talk 06:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * About your userpage? Just press "enter" enough times to move the section below the other material. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 15:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh.. I was worried that that solution would give different results on different screen sizes/resolutions. (The text beside the dragon icon, for example, has the desired spacing on some screens, where the words start below instead of wrapping to the right, but on other screens it wraps. If I move the words down on the big screen, there's a huge space underneath on the other screens.

Anyway, thanks for your solution-- it works well enough for me either way! Dr.queso =  talk 18:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. (Can you have the userbox say you bought me something nonalcoholic?  I'm only fourteen.) Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 21:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring on Astatine monoiodide
You aren't near 3RR yet but there's a talk page available for a reason. Use it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Let's continue discussing the existence of the article on Talk:Astatine monoiodide. Double sharp (talk) 06:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Double sharp (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

VSEPR, AtI, talk pages
Hi Whoop whoop pull up,

I've noticed you are becoming a little too strident in your editing. Please use the talk pages more before making controversial edits to articles such as astatine monoiodide and VSEPR theory. Your edits will face much less resistance if you explain your reasoning clearly and allow your arguments to be debated. You will not get very far if you keep trying to impose content despite genuine and serious concerns from fellow edits. It is particularly important that your provide citations to references for all substantial new content.

As far as VSEPR is concerned, adding odd electron species makes the table much longer and more complicated. If you really think such species need to be discussed in detail, (i) propose the idea first at Talk:VSEPR theory and (ii) do not update the article VSEPR theory itself until you have consensus. I would prefer odd electron species to be listed in a separate section. You should note that chemistry textbooks generally do not list odd-electron species in their discussion of VSEPR theory, and that VSEPR is generally not applied to compounds of transition metals, lanthanides or actinides. Stick to reliable sources (just follow mainstream chemistry textbooks) and take advice from the experienced chemists at WT:CHEMISTRY.

Best wishes, --Ben (talk) 10:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Valences
Please see Template talk:Periodic table (valence). Briefly: valence ≠ number of bonds an element can form. R8R Gtrs made that mistake last time and got whacked at the link I gave you. Double sharp (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * About HArF: I thought you'd earlier said that it doesn't contain Ar(II), having H: +1, Ar: 0, F: −1? (I do in fact think it has Ar(II).) Double sharp (talk) 09:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This is not a table of oxidation states. And if valence is not the number of bonds an element can form, than explain to me what it is. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 14:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oxidation states is an updated form of the valence concept. Read the valence (chemistry) article more carefully (I agree that it is not especially well written): "The valence of an element depends on the number of valence electrons that may be involved in the forming of valence bonds." So, for example, has a valence of 4, not 5. Also,  and  have valence 7, not 9. The hypothetical, though, would have a valence of 10, and not 8, if it existed. (It definitely doesn't have valence 4, even though the Pt is forming 4 bonds, showing that valence isn't always the number of bonds! Otherwise Os would have maximum valence 6 with  and not 8 with , which isn't the case.) (It has been predicted, but hasn't been observed.) Double sharp (talk) 07:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Superactinides
No, the superactinides stop at Upt, as has been referenced. Whether you think it is logical for Usu–Ust to be included is irrelevant. (Nobody reliable seems to have invented a term for the elements just below the superactinides: the most I could find is apsidium.com's "eka-superactinides", which is logical but unreliable and so shouldn't be used.) Don't make personal decisions about facts. (Note: Ubn is not a superactinide by any remotely logical definition.) Double sharp (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ...and you have edited Compact extended periodic table to use "eka-superactinide" and change all the colours to your own fancy, ignoring the WP:ELEM standards, how useful yours is to the reader (not very; the chalcogens obscure the metalloids, and hydrogen is a nonmetal), and despite me telling you that "eka-superactinide" is nowhere near being standard. If you don't stop this trend of editing, you're heading towards another block. (Not from me; I'm not an admin. But given that this isn't the first time you've done something like this, and that this isn't the first time you've been warned for it, you really are headed for one.) Double sharp (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Since you've repeated your edit despite me telling you why it's in fact misinformation, I have reported you at WP:AIV. Double sharp (talk) 08:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, feel free to revert it (I must not have seen this message). Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 09:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Reverted. I've removed the report because of your statement that you didn't see this message. In future, please try to check your talk page more frequently. Double sharp (talk) 11:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Because of this, we have a discussion on WT:ELEM on what to colour Usu, Usb, and Ust as. They're not superactinides, but there really isn't any accurate, reliable term for them, and the superactinides are the closest. Double sharp (talk) 13:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Template:Compact extended periodic table, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Double sharp (talk) 10:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

A CHEEZBURGAH for you!

 * -D Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 22:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)