User talk:WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- -

Welcome!
Hello, WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- -, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BioDan Group


A tag has been placed on BioDan Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I just saw a red article and the first thing I thought was to create the article. I have never seen any rules about creating wiki from the fact that I thought it was just gonna be obvious. I was brand new. WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to Mike Worsley seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

October 2023
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Rabbit vesivirus (RaV). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Vändra
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vändra, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20WhyIsNameSoHardOmg-_-&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1184592261 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=V%C3%A4ndra&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1184592261%7CVändra%5D%5D Ask for help])

minor edits and edit summaries
Hi WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- -! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Also: Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 20:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi WhyIsNameSoHardOmg. I noticed that the issues that Doctormatt mentioned are still occurring. You seem to still be flagging issues as minor edits that do not qualify for that flag, and your edits are missing summaries. I hope you will consider reviewing Help:Minor edit for guidance and start adding edit summaries; it would really help out your fellow editors. Jlahorn (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit summaries (March 2024)
Hello, WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- -! I noticed that you regularly remove content from articles without providing an edit summary, as you've done with Clean Air India Movement. As DoctorMatt informed you in November, you must provide an edit summary, especially when removing a large amount of content from an article. As DoctorMatt stated, "This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the 'prompt me when entering a blank edit summary' box in your preferences. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
⇒  SWAT Jester   Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 07:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- -. Thank you for your work on Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cambial — foliar❧ 16:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Addition of material from user-generated websites
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Cambial — foliar❧ 16:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I mean, I'm sorry. Though for warnings, I still believe that I'm right (humbly for sure!). Can we talk here? The first is that it is technically not wrong. As in the claims can or have been accidentally turned from "It was changed on this date" to "It was archived on this date". Yeah, I'm wrong on the first. Also, I thought editing warring is more severe than that ngl. I also might have gotten too far on the Ignore all rules WP. No one good-faithed user love blocks and I will defend myself (hopefully not in a war).
 * Please detail what the problematic claims are (per bold). WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It's really simple. The source for the material you added is a user-generated content website. We don't treat such websites as reliable sources on Wikipedia. Reliable sources determine not only the facts, but which facts are useful and relevant to an encyclopaedia article. The names of various forum posts do not appear in a reliable source = they are not appropriate to an encyclopaedia article on the topic. Cambial — foliar❧</b> 16:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Can it might be Original research? Also, Wikipedia is never simple. (I'm assuming it's the variance post's titles, but contrast per Wayback Machine's reliability in not fabricating contents). I think this level of super determinism isn't necessary and it hurts (kind of relevant but semi-useless information. WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - (talk) 17:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I don't understand Can it might be Original research?, nor but contrast per Wayback Machine's reliability in not fabricating contents. Regardless, please don't use user-generated content as a reliable source for a citation in future. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#4682B4 0.1em 0.1em 1.5em,#4682B4 -0.1em -0.1em 1.5em;color:#000000"><i style="color:#999900">Cambial </i>— <b style="color:#218000">foliar❧</b> 17:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ookey WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kling AI (June 9)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kling AI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kling_AI Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeraxmoira&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kling_AI reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)