User talk:Whytheracism

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Whytheracism, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to UK Asian Music Awards does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

UK Asian Music Awards
Note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. It is not a place to voice your opinion. If you have a reliable source which makes these claims, we can find a place to put it in the article. --Muhandes (talk) 21:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to UK Asian Music Awards. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at UK Asian Music Awards shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Muhandes (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at UK Asian Music Awards, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

 * This block is largely because you logged out in an attempt to circumvent 3RR on UK Asian Music Awards. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)