User talk:Wiae/Archive 6

A Barnstar!

 * Thank you for the barnstar! /wia /talk 01:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Floyd-Warshall algorithm question
My correction of the Floyd Algorithm are correct. The entire artcle needs a rewrite to be both understandable and correct. As it remains, it is confusing my students and I spend a lot of time correcting their errors gleaned from this article. This is a simple to understand algorithm when explained clearly. Instead we don't only have mathematical snobbery, but truly inaccurate information. I am SICK of wikipeadia inability to just tell wrong from write. Mathematical truth is not a matter of a VOTE. When k = 1, it is not equal to zero. Fixing this page requires a complete rewrite because the graph and the agorthms don't match and the explanation doesn't inform the reader of facts. Not having fixed these problems in the article has been called not passing a litmus test. The only litmus test here is if the article is informative and educational. It is NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.82 (talk) 02:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I am not able to dust off my graph theory textbook tonight and discuss the mathematical details. But I reverted your edits because you are not going about your proposed corrections the right way. Writing that the article "is incorrect" within the article itself is not the place to do so; rather, the talk page is where you want to start.


 * Are you familiar with WP:BRD? Be bold in your editing, but once you've been reverted, it's time to discuss and seek consensus at the talk page, instead of trying to push through your changes. As you can see, you've been reverted by multiple editors, many of whom have technical mathematical backgrounds, meaning that it's time to discuss and forge real consensus. Until you do that, your proposed changes to the article simply won't stick. I hope this clarifies the administrative side of the issue! /wia /talk 02:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

15:22:17, 18 May 2015 review of submission by Minkyumthemaster
Minkyumthemaster (talk) 15:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, can you explain exactly what your question is? /wia /talk 15:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Kaitlyn Dias
Dear WIA,

Thank you for your feedback.

This is in regards to the "Comment: IMDb and Wikipedia are not reliable sources. The remaining references don't discuss Kaitlyn Dias in enough detail to prove that she's notable. They only mention her in passing, in at most one sentence. To make out notability, you'll need to find and add reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, wia (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)"

I understand the situation, but part of the problem I am having is that she is a new comer in Pixar's up coming (june 19th) movie Inside Out, and no one has started talking about her in detail yet. I would like for them/the public to have a place (Wikipedia) that they can go to start getting accurate information on Kaitlyn.

Best Regards, RichardGDias1 (talk) 00:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Richard Dias


 * If there is no detailed information about Kaitlyn Dias on the web, then what content could we possibly put in a Wikipedia article? Therein lies the problem with some subjects (especially up-and-coming people) on Wikipedia; they're just too soon. If there's no substantive content about Dias available yet, perhaps there will be more once the film opens. The good news is that there's no deadline or rush when it comes to drafts. Once enough has been written about her, the article subject will become notable and it the article will likely be accepted. /wia /talk 00:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

WIA,

Agreed. We should see more press on Kaitlyn next month.

Thanks again, RichardGDias1 (talk) 00:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Richard Dias

Request on 06:14:13, 19 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MacMason
Hi Wikiisawesome! I think I got it this time-- resubmitted today…

MacMason (talk) 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC) MacMason (talk) 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

National Christian Foundation
Hi WIA,

Thanks for your feedback to my AFC for National Christian Foundation. Your notes were helpful, and I updated the verbiage in the article:
 * Removed buzzwords like, "solutions" throughout the article. You're right - that screams "buzz".
 * I decided to capitalize "Asset-Based Giving" because that's how I saw it used on their website and throughout the web. From what I gather, "Asset-Based Giving" is not limited to $$, but also tangible products. Still, I went ahead and removed it from the article.
 * ......reworded other items and made small changes throughout the article.

Would you mind reviewing once more? Additional feedback is welcome!

Should I resubmit? Or is notifying you enough? Since you've been sort of overseeing the article, I especially want your feedback.

Thanks in advance.

Talk soon, Copeland


 * Sorry I didn't respond right away; I've been busy. The article's reading better now. I typically don't review an article twice in a row but I've gone ahead and resubmitted it for you. Another reviewer should be along within a few weeks to have another go at the article. In the meantime, you're more than welcome to continue tinkering with the draft or working on something else on Wikipedia; there's always something to be done!


 * Also, you can sign your talk page posts by putting four tildes after your comment, like this: ~ . /wia /talk 19:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Abdulaziz Al-Bashir review
Hi Wia, First of all I would like to thank you very much for the time you've taken to review my article. As for the sources, most of the article is based on a booklet written on Abdulaziz Al-Bashir, but the booklet is in Arabic. We've also taken some information from well known Arabic newspapers in Kuwait. If you would like me to scan the booklet for you, I would do so. Here are two links of newspaper articles in Arabic, but I have more.

http://alwatan.kuwait.tt/articledetails.aspx?id=414585 http://www.alqabas-kw.com/Article.aspx?id=1016865&date=15012015

Thanks again

Radbleu (talk) 10:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You are allowed to cite the booklet if it is a reliable source. If it is indeed reliable, you wouldn't need to scan a copy, per WP:RS:


 * The term "published" is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online. However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third party and be properly cited. Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist. It is convenient, but by no means necessary, for the archived copy to be accessible via the Internet.


 * I'm not familiar with many Arabic newspapers, but if these two meet the reliability standard, then they can certainly be included in the references and will help. Another thing you should do is add inline citations whenever you make claims about the subject that are contentious or likely to be challenged. Inline citations are important because they help readers track down the reference to the specific claims made in an article. Those sources you mentioned above will help, but I'd consider trying to find even more references to convincingly demonstrate his notability.


 * I fear there is also some original research scattered throughout the draft. Simply put, original research can sneak into an article when there are subjective claims, opinions, value judgments and the like about the subject. For example, the Draft:Abdulaziz Al-Bashir article claims that "He constantly encouraged employees to enrol in training courses and higher studies, which was also a helpful element in keeping up with latest developments in the field". This needs an inline citation or else, to be blunt, it might appear to the reader that the author has made it up. The "Favorite pastime" section also contains original research, which should be either supported by references that explicitly back up those claims, or it should be removed entirely. /wia /talk 20:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

A useful tool for the disambiguation contest.
Have I told you about this list? bd2412 T 19:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Is this essentially a continuation of the list from which the first thousand DAB pages (the ones that make up the DAB challenge) are culled? Cool! I haven't been as active as I'd like recently (real life creeps in now and again) but I will bookmark this page and take a stab at it when I can. Thanks! /wia /talk 21:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, no - this is a list of articles containing the most disambiguation links that need fixing, and that count for the contest. Go through two dozen of these pages and you'll have fixed a hundred links. bd2412  T 21:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

K Rend
Hi WIA

Thanks for your comments. They are very helpful. I'm hoping you can steer me in the right direction. I had previously rewritten the History section of my draft as suggested by you previously. As suggested I didn't paraphrase, however there are some phrases that need to remain the same as the K News article because they are peoples names etc. Is there any other way around this, or any other suggestions that you might have. I really need this article to go live and am willing to make the necessary changes to do so.

Hi I have also noticed that you have pointed to JP Corrys website for copyrighting. This is actually copy I have written for submission on their website. Any suggestions? I could ask them to remove it until this article makes it through the submission process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debbie M Wilson (talk • contribs) 13:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Thanks in advance Debbie M Wilson (talk) 07:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Names aren't a copyright issue, so you're good there! The sentences I have flagged for copyright issues are as follows:


 * "The K Rend silicone range incorporates silicone water repellents as an integral part of the cement based render system. This silicone technology imparts a high degree of water repellency to the render surface whilst allowing water vapour to pass through the render allowing the substrate to breathe. The water repellent surface ensures a freshly rendered appearance for a prolonged period. The finish is drier and thus more resistant to algae growth and the natural phenomenon of limebloom."
 * "K Rend Silicone Scraped Textured Renders - a range of one coat applications which can be plastered directly on to block work. They can also be used as a finish in conjunction with a K Rend Base Coat. There are 20 standard colours for the scraped texture range. Special colours are also available from a customisable pallet, upon request."
 * "K Rend Silicone Thin Coat (TC) Renders - Silicone Thin Coat is a pre-mixed, silicone based, ready to use organic resin render which is usually hand applied. It provides a low maintenance, decorative finish, is available in two different textures TC 15 & TC 30 and in a wide range of colours. Silicone TC holds the prestigious kitemark licence to BS EN 15827:2009"
 * "Uses High performance decorative textured finish for application onto a prepared substrate. Particularly suitable where lightweight render systems are required, such as an external wall insulation system Benefits Water repellent Low maintenance Allows structure to breathe Natural looking finish Extensive colour range"
 * "Silicone Thin Coat can be colour matched using the Natural Colour System offered users a wider range of colour options."


 * These should be rephrased or removed entirely. If you have written those texts yourself for the company website, it's likely that copyright has fallen to your employer. In that case, you aren't permitted to use it on Wikipedia unless your employer licenses the copyrighted text to Wikipedia. See WP:PERMISSIONS for details on how copyright-holders can license text to Wikipedia. I've never done it myself, but I hear the whole process takes a bit of time. If you've got any other questions, I'm happy to field them here as best I can! /wia /talk 20:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)



Hi WIA Thanks so much for pinpointing to the issues. I have email K Rend marketing manager who has approved use of the material and submitted the links to Wikimedia commons. Fingers crossed. Debbie M Wilson (talk) 12:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 11:09:19, 22 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Craiger19
Thanks Wia for your help with my first submission (Emil Milan). It is accepted now. I deleted/rewrote everything I thought could be seen as promotional or original research. But it is still tagged as sometimes a problem in those respects. Can you take another look at it? Any guidance from you would be appreciated. Thanks, Craig. Craiger19 (talk) 11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Craiger19 (talk) 11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The article looks pretty good to me, although a few more references in the "Use of Wood and other materials" and "Tools and Techniques" sections would help show that the content of those sections is not original research. Once you feel that you have cleaned up those sections according to Wikipedia's standards, you're welcome to be bold and remove the cleanup tag yourself! Ah, Primefac has suggested that another user remove the tag themselves. Okay, how about this: if you can find some more references, add them and then let me know here on my talk page and I'll re-review that section. /wia /talk 13:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Abdulaziz Al-Bahsir _Radio Program
Dear Wia, Thank you very much for your prompt reply and constructive advice. I am including an audio file, which is a weekly radio program. This program was broadcast by the second Kuwaiti official radio station about 2 months ago, the program is well known as well as the presenter by all Kuwaitis. We received a copy from the station itself that I uploaded to dropbox. Here is the link:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sez8rpibx8r9v7k/AAB-loA920RAKFTi3uSEAxzaa?dl=0

The program has everything mentioned in the article and more. I hope will help so that we can publish the article. Thank you. Radbleu (talk) 13:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You can cite a radio show as long as it's an independent, reliable one, and as long as there is an archived copy of the show. You can cite AV media using the Cite AV media template. /wia /talk 13:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

13:01:58, 23 May 2015 review of submission by 110.148.117.189
To Whom it may concern, I am requesting a re-review as I have written this as neutral as I believe necessary. As a female architect, there is a general lack of female representation in the field prominently male. It is not my intention for the entry to read as an advertisement for Dr Maturana, I believe this may be due to many of her opinions as most of her work expresses these opinions. The book publication can also be deleted if this will help with the entry, this was a major publication for her and it seemed relevant to include but if it is against the wikipedia guidelines then I can remove it with no issue. I am happy to edit out the sections which you feel the entry is not subjective enough or rewrite sections altogether provided you feedback. I would not like to see an architect with such global influences and a history of social justice not be more freely known to all wikipedia users. I do hoipe you reconsider or provide some feedback for a more balanced entry that you would deem appropriate for wikipedia. Thank you Chris Buchhorn 110.148.117.189 (talk) 13:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You're welcome to resubmit any time you'd like and someone else will take a look at the article in the next few weeks. In the interim, however, I'd suggest taking a look at the comments I've left on the draft itself. In particular, there is some non-neutral content and some synthesis that should be dealt with. /wia /talk 13:13, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you my friend.

 * Keep working on the article! And even if you are unable to find the references need to prove the subject's notability, there's always plenty of things to do on Wikipedia. We'd love to have you help out! /wia /talk 14:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 23:21:42, 23 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Craiger19
Thanks Wia. I shortened the "Use of Wood" and "Tools and Techniques" sections and added more references. Please take another look when you can. Craig Craiger19 (talk) 23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Craiger19 (talk) 23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Looks good. I've gone ahead and removed the tags at the top and bottom of the page. Congrats on the article! I hope you continue contributing on Wikipedia—we desperately need more writers! /wia /talk 23:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

01:09:44, 24 May 2015 review of submission by Bbosramek
I am the author of the copyrighted Hemodynamic Management Chart at hemodynamicsociety.org (I am the Society's Chairman). I have removed the "copyright" logo form the Chart at Wikipedia article and uploaded it under Commons, so I hope the article is now acceptable for publication. Thanks, Bo Bbosramek (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Bbosramek (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * It's not just the table at http://www.hemodynamicsociety.org/syshemo.html that's at issue; there's also some text that's been copied. Since the content on that website is copyrighted, you can't use it on Wikipedia just yet—even if you are the copyright-holder. What you need to do is follow the instructions at Donating copyrighted materials. Specifically, WP:DONATETEXT is the section of that article that will probably be the most help to you. I hope this has cleared things up, and thanks for your contributions! /wia /talk 01:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

01:45:09, 24 May 2015 review of submission by Bbosramek
I have just remove the copyright from the corresponding web site at the hemodynamicsociety.org. Will that, together with removing the copyright symbol from Fig.10, resolve the copyright issue? Please let me know. Bbosramek (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Bbosramek (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I am not completely sure. I think that because of WP:COMPLIC, the mere absence of the copyright logo is insufficient to remove your copyright over the text. (In essence, I think your copyright subsists regardless of whether you claim it.) However, I am no expert in American copyright law, and so I suggest you ask at WP:CQ. Someone there should know whether merely removing the copyright symbol is sufficient. Sorry I don't have the answer for you, but copyright is a tricky legal issue and I want to make sure you get the right answer. Thanks! /wia /talk 01:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

14:45:25, 24 May 2015 review of submission by Albanianhistory
Hello! I only have one source at the moment, written in Albanian. How many sources are required for this to be approved?

Albanianhistory (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * It often depends on the situation, but a good rule of thumb is at WP:BIO: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." You'll need to find significant coverage in multiple sources. So there's not a bright-line rule for the number of references you'll need. I'd try to find at least another one, maybe another two. Check old newspapers on Google, at your local library, on databases like Jstor and the like (if you have access). You never know what'll turn up! /wia /talk 16:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Abdulaziz Al-Bashir review - Added ref.
Dear Wia,

Thank you once again for your guidance. I added some new references and included the audio. As for the sentence "He constantly encouraged employees to enrol in training courses and higher studies, which was also a helpful element in keeping up with latest developments in the field" and The "Favorite pastime" section, they are clearly mentioned in the radio program and the booklet. But, if you think it is better that I discard them, I will.

Also Wia, I am preparing the Arabic and French versions; what is the procedure? Thank you and enjoy what is left of the weekend. Radbleu (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * If those claims are explicitly cited in the radio program and booklet, then you can keep them in, as long as they are written in a way that complies with WP:NPOV and as long as you put an inline citation after the claims.


 * As for writing the article in Arabic and French, the requirements differ on the different-language Wikipedias. You can create an account on the French Wikipedia and try posting your article there; I think they have different notability and referencing requirements, but I'm not totally sure, so I'd suggest asking around on the French Wikipedia itself. Same goes for the Arabic Wikipedia. /wia /talk 16:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:17:09, 24 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Stigmatella aurantiaca
Hi, I put the article through a plagiarism checker and believe that I successfully avoided plagiarism and close paraphrasing, so maybe what you used was more sensitive than the one that I used. Could you post the problematical sections on my talk page? Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Sure, no problem. I'll message on your talk page. /wia /talk 17:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 21:41:32, 24 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Maedean Shepard
Sorry for the trouble, it was indeed meant as a user page. Found the correct path to do so now, must've misclicked somewhere when taking my first steps on my account.

Thanks for pointing out the error ;)

Maedean Shepard (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Maedean Shepard (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem! I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! /wia /talk 21:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

y u revert mai editz? :(
teh editz 0n d4rk m4tt3r?????? oneoneone :(111--68.168.122.157 (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)--68.168.122.157 (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)--68.168.122.157 (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Your edits to Dark matter constituted vandalism and have been removed. If you would like to edit Wikipedia, please make sure you do so constructively! /wia /talk 23:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Human Right Self Defense
Why Did you delete my analysis on the Uniquely American Human Right Self Defense what's protected by the 2nd Amendment ? 1) are you an American ?


 * The content you added to Second Amendment to the United States Constitution was unreferenced original research that was not written in the formal style that Wikipedia requires. I suggest reading WP:NPOV. /wia /talk 21:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

That's a lot to read. Could you be more specific ?


 * Well, contributing to Wikipedia usually entails a lot of reading, and sooner or later it's advisable to read all of Wikipedia's policies to get a good handle on them. But two parts of that page that are important are WP:IMPARTIAL and WP:SUBJECTIVE. I would also add WP:OR and WP:SYNTH to the list. They're not long sections and I think they'd be helpful to read. /wia /talk 00:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikiisawesome - --- I'm not being disruptive. It's a uniquely American  Human Right to be able to defend Self. You have a Self so stand tall and defend Self. We all do have this tight to be able to defend self from rape/murder which are violations of self. Get the point please. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg (talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Actually, the right to self defence is not a uniquely American one, as it exists in the Canadian (and presumably the British) common law. Furthermore, you are not citing any legitimate sources for these bald assertions, and so it comes off as original research. I understand what you're trying to do here on Wikipedia, but if you continue shoving that content into articles without regard for consensus or WP:NPOV, your attempts will consistently be reverted and you may end up being blocked. You need reputable sources and consensus if you want your edits to stick. /wia /talk 10:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Reputable is based on Natural Law. You have Self given by God and, he does want you defend it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg (talk • contribs) 18:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, merely saying that something is natural law does not make it so, nor does it necessarily make it suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Right now, your interpretation of the Second Amendment is just that—an original interpretation, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. It might work on a blog or a personal website, but not here. You will need to find and add reliable, independent (third-party) sources that have explicitly argued that the Second Amendment is as you say it is. "Natural law" itself is not a reliable source. Indeed, it is not a source at all. Next, you will need to suggest your changes on the appropriate talk page in an effort to forge consensus. If consensus is against you, then the content cannot be added to Wikipedia. /wia /talk 19:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Well I faxed my interpretation and vision to Congress and, I hope they will work to fix it. It's in the Bill of Rights. Now if you are an American, I hope you will see what I'm trying to do and raise the bar a bit, and it would be good for the economy too. As you know Rape and Murder are evil, and as an American, we do have a right to defend Self from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg (talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Texoma
Yeah I agree not really constructive. Im from the area. Fact is no one lives on the islands. They are tiny little sandy islands where people pull up boats and party. So while what I said is indeed true, I guess there are more eloquent ways to describe what goes on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.117.84.163 (talk) 22:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * If you can find a reliable source discussing who lives there, you're welcome to add the content to the article! (So long as you follow Wikipedia's policies, naturally.) /wia /talk 00:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

New Article Submission on Regression Therapy
I understand you have rejected a new article on "Regression Therapy" and have suggested that it is included in an existing article on "Past Life Regression". I would like you to reconsider this decision the following reasons;

Regression Therapy is a separate discipline of therapy drawing on many healing modularities; age regression, inner child regression, body therapy, transpersonal experiences, and If stories emerge from a client that appear to be past lives they are dealt with as healing metaphors. Thats was clearly stated in the article. This is completely different from past life regression which is about allowing people having just "past life experiences" which they may think are real.

Past Life Regression is a controversial subject open to different religious and cultural views and the article is subject to may changes and disputes. Not an area I wish to enter.

Regression therapy is practiced by medical doctors and therapists working to a clearly defined international standard. It has thousands of therapists across the world doing this work. As such it deserves respect from Wikipedia to have an article covering this work.

The article on Regression Therapy has been written to provide notability and verification to meet Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy Tomlinson (talk • contribs) 09:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but these two subjects still seem very similar to me. One is "a technique that uses hypnosis to recover what practitioners believe are memories of past lives or incarnations", while the other "uses a range of hypnotherapy and psychotherapy techniques but differs by putting more focus on regression and working with transpersonal experiences to transform them". I don't see any substantial difference in definition here, your post notwithstanding. The only difference seems to be the willingness of practitioners to treat memories as a metaphor. You're welcome to seek a second opinion at the Help Desk, of course. Just post your question there according to the guidelines and someone should be along to answer within a few hours. /wia /talk 10:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * If this logic is followed Regression Therapy could equally be added to articles on inner child regression, body memories, hypnosis or age regression. I'm sorry I disagree and would like the opinions from other editors. I'm new to writing Wikipedia articles and have put in a great mount of effort to meet all the requirements for a new page. Help please. /talk 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * That's okay; disagreements are bound to happen from time to time on Wikipedia. The best course of action is to seek the opinion of other editors. Consensus is a great way to solve problems! Go on over to the Help Desk and post your question there (something along the lines of "my draft was declined for reason x; I think it deserves a re-review for reasons y and z."). Someone should be along with a fresh set of eyes not too long after you post! /wia /talk 11:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll note also that you appear to have cited your own publications in the draft article, which means you may have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, and it is highly advisable to read WP:COI before proceeding with any edition in the subject. /wia /talk 10:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * My name was not mentioned in the article and I was not aware of a conflict of interest. In any event of the 64 references my books were mentioned 4 times. If this is an issue I'll pass my work on the article to an independent editor and they can include or reject my book references and resubmit the article /talk 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 13:14:52, 27 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Paid2Tweet
My submission was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Marsh & McLennan Companies instead." Marsh and Marsh & McLennan companies are separate entities. Marsh and McLennan companies is the parent company of Marsh LLC. We share history but they are separate and distinct entities.

Could you please let me know what I need to do get the Marsh page published?

Paid2Tweet (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I will be busy for the next 5–6 hours but will give you a detailed answer later today! Thanks, /wia /talk 14:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * One of the main problems with the article is the referencing. Of all the references, only one (the Reuters article) talks about Marsh itself in significant detail. None of the others even seem to mention Marsh; instead, they all talk about Marsh & McLennan. In fact, the Bloomberg article seems to use the two names interchangeably. So while the companies may be different entities, the current referencing is a problem. You can remedy this by finding reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss Marsh (not just Marsh & McLennan) in significant detail. Alternatively, you could roll some of the content about Marsh into the existing Marsh & McLennan Companies article, perhaps by adding a new "History" section.


 * I hope this answer makes sense. Let me know if you'd like further guidance or have any other questions! /wia /talk 20:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

17:30:30, 24 May 2015 review of submission by Stigmatella aurantiaca
Hi, I tried a different plagiarism checker (Grammarly). The lede passed Grammarly, but you're right, the Instrument section looks problematical. Give me a day to work on it.

Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Sure, that sounds good. The article looks great, so I'm sure once you resubmit it won't be long before it's approved. Thanks for all your hard work—I don't write too many articles, but when I do, I'm always cognizant of the effort required. /wia /talk 17:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm really upset. I worked very hard to bring the score down to 36.3%, but just today, a new link appeared "Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V" that gives a match of 49.0%!!! Looking closely at the Source, the matches are all isolated phrases. Advice? Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * It's not merely the number that indicates copyvio problems, but rather the similarities between the texts. The number the copyvio detector returns is sometimes helpful but it doesn't necessarily mean there's a copyright issue. If you compare the text of the two links here, you'll find that the majority of the putatively copied text is actually a series of names and proper nouns, which is not a copyright violation. So you don't have anything to worry about from a copyright perspective! /wia /talk 22:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

15:29:08, 28 May 2015 review of submission by Misterhandsfriend
Search the supplied link, http://emmyonline.org/mediacenter/sports_34th_winners.html Jeff Kalvin is listed. It is properly referenced. Misterhandsfriend (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, and thanks for inquiring here! Per WP:BIO, articles about people require multiple reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. The current reference offers only one sentence about Kelvin. That's not sufficient coverage of Kelvin to make out notability, so more reliable sources will be necessary. /wia /talk 15:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Question concerning new article
Hello there,

So I created a new article and submitted for review. You mentioned I need more reliable references. Question is, references must be in English or any language will do? Tnks a million ;-) Mironit9 (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Mironit9


 * Non-English sources are allowed, although English ones are preferable if you can find them! WP:NOENG details the policy. Happy editing and sourcing! /wia /talk 19:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

20:07:23, 28 May 2015 review of submission by TCVCJ
To add references:
 * www.townoftazewell.org; "Back of the Dragon 2015;"
 * www.motorcyclemonster.com; Back of the Dragon Day - The Dragon Roars;
 * www.motorcycleroads.com - Virginia's State Route 16 - Road Quality.


 * I see you have some references there! Go ahead and add them to the draft, and once you're satisfied with the referencing, try resubmitting the article. A reviewer will be along in the coming weeks to have another look. /wia /talk 20:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:43:32, 27 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Soniamo
Dear Wikiiawesome, thanks for your feedback re my proposed article "European research and innovation for environment: policy and actions" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:European_research_and_innovation_for_environment:_policy_and_actions#More_information_about_the_European_research_and_innovation_for_environment_policy

Could you please help by pointing out which paragraphs you consider copied from a report? Many thanks, Monica Soniamo (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll be away from my computer for the next two hours, but after that I will run the report again and identify the sentences that I found to be too closely paraphrased. Thanks, /wia /talk 17:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * thanks Wikiiawesome, I have been chatting with other reviewers and they agreed it's not about plagiarism, please see below:

19:14] <+topaz> soniamo: I think I agree that this is an "edge case" and that the instnaces of copied material don't constitute copyright infringement

So I am working with topaz and we will submit it again. if you have other comments, please let me know

Thanks, Monica


 * Certainly, and I'll pitch in too if needed. I did think it was an edge case and so I'll happily defer if others agree it doesn't constitute a copyright or plagiarism problem. Best of luck with the article! /wia /talk 18:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * great thanks!


 * The sentences I had identified are "It is expected that at least 60 % of the overall Horizon 2020 budget should be related to sustainable development. It is also expected that climate-related expenditure should exceed 35 % of the overall Horizon 2020 budget". /wia /talk 22:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * thanks! this is an extract from a press release and we have quoted it. we can add the quotation marks to be more precise and correct. however, your rejection reason was plagiarsim from the report http://ec.europa.eu/research/environment/pdf/research_for_the_environment.pdf. can we now agree that this is no longer the case?
 * thanks,
 * monica

Sorry for the late reply. I think the copying issue from the europa site you linked above has been dealt with. Once you've finished cleaning up the article, you can resubmit it and an AFC reviewer will be along in the coming weeks to take another look. Thanks, /wia /talk 23:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks

Request on 04:28:59, 29 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Khumpinla
Hi - I am trying to add a new Wikipedia page for Jennifer Yen, and it was rejected due to insufficient sources. Jennifer played Vypra in the Power Rangers. I was looking at the Power Rangers page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Rangers_Lightspeed_Rescue, and then at another one of the villian's wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Salinger -- it looks like the page for Diane Salinger has fewer references than the Jennifer Yen submission. Also, her only references are IMDB and her personal website. How did this page get approved, but the one for Jennifer was not? Is there something I should do differently?

Thanks!

Khumpinla (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi! Since Wikipedia is a volunteer project, some bad articles tend to slip through the cracks and end up on Wikipedia from time to time. If we were to judge all new content by comparison to existing articles, it could lower the quality of new Wikipedia content. As such, the "what about this other article?" argument doesn't hold much water on Wikipedia. If you're looking for a good article to compare with, you can search through the Featured Articles for inspiration, like James T. Aubrey, for example. I'll take a look at that article you mentioned.


 * As for your article, keep on looking for good references! When you feel you've met the notability requirement, feel free to resubmit. Thanks! /wia /talk 11:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Editing on the page typing
Thank you for telling me you don't think the paragraph on "Brady typing" is not appearing constructive to you, but I have to say, just because you don't think is constructive doesn't means it is not to other users. Is not a good thing to let other reader knows that there's such thing on the internet. If you think that part is not constructive, oh boy you have tons and tons of pages that you have to delete, e.g. the page on the M-stock in Hong Kong MTR. Only a tiny tiny amount of people cares about that, but it still exists; on the other hand the word "Brady typing" cares buy thousands and thousands of fans of "Hello Internet", and you don't let it exist. Such logic. Mr Fat Lai (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You will need to find reliable sources for that information, and it will have to achieve consensus before it is added. I've seen similar content removed from that article several times in the past, so it is a contentious issue. Regarding the "what about this other article" point you raise, take a look at WP:WAX, which addresses your concerns. /wia /talk 16:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:15:35, 30 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by AudreyCD
The page I submitted although the content may appear on the Phoenix Patriot Foundation website, I AUTHORED all of the content on that website. You may, however delete the page as you see fit. Since this is my first stab at Wikipedia I understand the reason why it would be assumed that I did not author the content.

AudreyCD 17:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, and thanks for inquiring on my page. Even if you authored the content at the Phoenix Patriot Foundation, it is copyrighted (scroll to the bottom of that site and you will see the copyright notice), meaning the copyright likely belongs to the organization now. You will need to seek permission from them to license the text to Wikipedia. Information on how this can be done is at WP:PERMISSION. I have nominated the article for speedy deletion because of the copyright infringement. However, you're welcome to have another try at the article in the future. Feel free to ask me any questions that you might have here, or at the WP:TEAHOUSE, a very friendly place to hang out and learn more about Wikipedia. /wia /talk 17:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

AfC: Draft:Ultrasonic pulse velocity test
Please reconsider the draft as I have corrected the article and cited it properly. Prymshbmg (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I see you've resubmitted the draft, so an AfC reviewer should be along in the coming days or weeks to have a second look. I'll note that there's a bit of WP:CITEKILL in places, so I'd suggest working on that while you wait. Thanks, /wia /talk 15:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reconsidering it so soon. Waiting for my first article to be published.Prymshbmg (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Fixed all the citation, Please revisit the article: Draft:Ultrasonic pulse velocity test. Prymshbmg (talk) 07:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Request on 07:02:15, 31 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Anne Terri
1. I am familiar with BBCoding, but not this.

2. I Am Not promoting a site, but sharing a current Biblical Time on Earth, of which I have been Asked of God to do, and due to the nature of these vast, dual Sites, and God Being the Primary Source on God's New Revelations side, it may seem as a promotion. It is He Who has Brought together The Messiahs of The Third Testament, He Asks you to show Me, why you have turned this down.

He Said "Wikipedia is about old history, We are Making New History. AMEN"

3. This is My Life's Work. It is not a blog site, but the Forum Format was chosen, for as a Messiah I have no funds to present an official website. You would have noted if you had read further, that it is an Official Bible and no one is allowed to write there in replies, as they do on Facebook, but they may ask of God Questions in the private messenger area. If Jesus had this opportunity in today's age, you would have turned him down, and never had The New Testament.

4. I had intended further editing today for more clarity, but have halted all efforts. Obviously this needs more editing, but based on your initial reaction to Our Submission, it may be a wasted effort.

We have many followers on Facebook, and interact with them daily. As a Visionary Artist, some of Our Gospel Lessons are presented with My Original Art, but even with submissions this is not allowed.

We do not ask for donations. I do not sell My paintings, or the Bible. I have much to do, and have not the time to feel frustration. This is what God Gave Me for today, so you see I Am Serious as are Our people. Daily I follow God's Will.

5.

“MAY 2015 Daily Diary of Events God's Living Bible - The Third Testament - Research Library - Daily Diary Of Events

(God Through Anne Terri With The Holy Spirit)

MAY 31, 2015 Daily Diary of Events

Yesterday, after spending the day submitting Our Site to Wikipedia, you had no time left for making Vatsa Sridatta's painting, nor Selected E-mails. Do this first, then continue My Summer List below. Our site has not been accepted for Wikipedia, for they consider this as a promotion for God's Living Bible.

GOD'S DAILY LIST FOR SUMMER 2015

ALWAYS

Take Care of Important Correspondence World New Updates Dreams and Visions Selected E-mails Coding for Messiahs and Apostles in need for presentation within The Third Testament

STUDY GUIDES IN PROGRESS

1) 1 Kings 1-8 completed Chapter 9 Started 2) The Book of Psalms 1-36 completed Chapter 37 Started 3) Proverbs (New) Chapter 1 Started 4) The Book of Isaiah 1-17 completed Next Chapter 18 Started 5) The Holy Qur'an Surahs 1-17 completed Next Surah 18

Comparison Studies

6) Study Guides - The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ - The Christ of the Piscean Age

7) Vatsa Sridatta's Paintings for Teaching Hinduism – to be done every three days. Next June 3

8) Ongoing – Master CVV Namaskarams Section – Teaching of Transendental Meditation; plus ultimately the practice of TARAKA RAJA YOGA.

9) Colors of The Third Testament for The Srimad Bhagavad Gita

10)Colors of The Third Testament for The Gospel of Thomas

AMEN"

Anne Terri (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:NOTWEBHOST. Wikipedia is not the place to store or host your own content. There are a number of free blogging platforms available on the Internet; choose one of them, because such hosting is prohibited on Wikipedia.


 * Also, if this content was told you by God, it is not a verifiable source, meaning it is not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you for your efforts but unfortunately we will not be able to accept this submission. /wia /talk 11:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you for the barnstar! You're welcome to contribute to the essay too once you get comfortable at AfC! /wia /talk 12:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay! I'll try my best to expand and improve the essay. :-) - Supdiop  talk  15:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm working on it offline right now and should have a big update ready in four hours or so. /wia /talk 15:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will work on it later. Before I contribute to the essay I would like to do some reading(research) on AFC project, like what kind of drafts are rejected and how to leave a good and helpful comments. I will take a look at some reviewed drafts and re-read the guidelines and policies. This may take some time. As I said above I will try my best - Supdiop  talk  16:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Wia, I joined the project today. I am going to start reviewing now. Thank you. - Supdiop  talk  20:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good! Just take it slow at first and work your way up to the tougher cases. I still deal mostly with the easier ones at this point, but there's always something to do! /wia /talk 20:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, Thank you - Supdiop  talk  20:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Assistance Requested
Thanks for your suggestions regarding my proposed "human excreta" article. For some background, until my proposal, the term "human excreta" was included under the "human waste" article and as a redirect to same. It is crucial to realize, however, that given the reasons I lay out in the article, while they may refer to the same material, their use (as terms) couldn't be more different. IOW one describes a "waste" material while the other describes a "resource". Since "human waste" has its own article I felt it was only right that "human excreta" has its own article as well. Please note that I modestly reworked the article and have added an additional reference (a TedX presentation), the latter of which may assist you in understanding the basis from which I am proposing the article. Now, as far as neutrality goes, I'm unclear how to improve the neutrality of an article that is in effect describing a political (and thus opinionated) concept or, said another way, a politicized term. Therefore, what ever additional assistance you can provide will be most appreciated. Thanks again. Gruster (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for stopping by. I thought about your draft for a while before reviewing it. It was a tough call. On the one hand, I see how the usage of "waste" is inherently negative, and how some parties are trying to change that perception. But on the other hand, my gut feeling is that this material might fit better in an existing article like sustainable sanitation. What I suggest doing is resubmitting the draft for review. Another AFC reviewer will come along and take a look in the coming days or weeks. I will also ask the denizens of WikiProject Sanitation for comment. Both of these courses of action will bring in fresh pairs of eyes and help us determine the best spot for this content.


 * As for the neutrality comment, I think the article looks better now after your revisions. I'll note that sometimes "many" is considered a weasel word since it creates "an impression that something specific and meaningful has been said, when in fact only a vague or ambiguous claim has been communicated". Other than that, I don't see much to worry about on the neutrality front. /wia /talk 18:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I have added my two-cents worth here. Or perhaps it is better to continue the discussion on the talk page of the article on human waste. EvM-Susana (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


 * We can certainly continue at human waste if that's not too much trouble for all involved! /wia /talk 20:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Abdulaziz Al-Bashir - new modifications
Dear Wia,

Following your guidance, I have made some modifications. Can I resubmit the article now. Thank you.

Radbleu (talk) 00:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Turn the external links within the body of the article into references, and then try resubmitting. There's a bit of a backlog right now, so it might be a while before someone gets around to looking at the article. But, to look on the bright side, that gives you more time to tinker with the article. And there's always plenty to do on Wikipedia! /wia /talk 00:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

04:11:24, 1 June 2015 review of submission by Saideepthik
This is a decent movie with budding and forgotten actors. A wiki page would get them more opportunities. Please check the credibility by watching the movie, whose DVD is out and make a decision. Saideepthik (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia articles tend not to get accepted merely to get the subject more promotion. Rather, Wikipedia articles must satisfy the notability criteria. Once you've applied the standards in WP:NFILM to your draft, you're welcome to resubmit and someone from the project should be along to look at it in the coming days or weeks. It looks like you've added some more references, which is good. /wia /talk 10:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

17:21:54, 1 June 2015 review of submission by Gfdemarest
Hi there, first, thanks for reviewing my article. I am taking steps to remove buzzwords and promotional language. I am not request a re-review yet until I get some clarification about my references.

You mention in your comments that "the majority of the sources in the references section don't mention SL Corporation by name at all." this may be true if you are just looking at the intro page to the articles, but there is significant coverage of SL in the full articles. But because these references are in analyst reports that require payment to access, you are not getting to the heart of the article.

As wikipedia says that "Sources do not have to be available online ", how can I show that my references are valid? These analyst reports are the most important and notable reference you can get in the tech world.

thanks for any thoughts you can spare on this.

Gfdemarest (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, thank you for inquiring here! You are correct in that sources need not be available online. However, you do need to provide enough detail so that someone can find them. The solution is to add the link to the actual analyst report, not just to the website's homepage or the introductory page. That way, someone with a subscription can access the report, and they don't have to search around the site to try to locate it themselves.


 * Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you. /wia /talk 18:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Absorb LMS Draft
Hey WIA - I've added another thorough 3rd party source (the Brandon Hall Group Technology Review) I hope that's enough to do the trick! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.45.130 (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll take another look in a few hours once I've gotten off work and report back with my thoughts! /wia /talk 17:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm opening the new link but it leads me to nothing but a login screen—is the content behind a paywall or accessibly by members only? /wia /talk 01:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey WIA, yes it is behind a members only paid subscription. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.45.130 (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, sources behind paywalls are acceptable, although since I don't personally have a subscription, I'm not able to read the article to assess it. The article has been submitted for review so it shouldn't be too long (a few weeks at most) before someone from the AfC project takes a look; I try not to review a draft twice in a row, so as to ensure impartial reviewing. In the meantime, you're welcome to continue tinkering with the article. /wia /talk 17:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Awesome. Thanks for the heads up and the initial review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.45.130 (talk) 21:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Articles for creation: Erol Erdinç
Hi there!

Thank you for shedding some light on this "not enough inline citations" stuff. To remind what you said:

″There are not enough inline citations in the draft. When you do so, take care that you are using reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Of the three links listed in your references section, two are from the subject himself (meaning they are not independent) and the third only mentions him in passing. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, wia (talk) 02:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)″

So I have a few questions regarding this:

This person is a musician. I thought that most reliable info must be in his official website and social media accounts. But you say that it is not objective. I'm not sure if I can find published material about a musician (conductor). What kinds of source can I use for reference? Can I use references like news from websites, past facebook events etc.? Can I use these references (news from websites, past facebook events etc.) written in Turkish for this English article?

It is my understanding that he engaged with Russian, French, Italian, Spanish, Brazilian orchestras and maybe there are sources in these languages but I don't understand these languages, so there is a little chance that I can use any source written in these languages. What can I do about this?

Thank you so much for your time.

Nefertura (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, and thank you for inquiring on my talk page! Sometimes you can learn true information about people from their social media accounts, yes. But on Wikipedia, information from reliable, independent sources takes preference. You can use any type of reliable source, including reputable news websites! However, Facebook events are generally not considered a reliable source; a good rule of thumb is to avoid relying on things from sites with user-generated content.


 * You can also use Turkish-language sources, as long as they are reliable ones. If you think there is a useful source but you don't speak the language, you could try inquiring at the relevant regional notice board. I'm not sure, but it's possible that someone might offer to help if you asked nicely. (I speak English and French, so if you you come across French-language sources, you're welcome to ask me for help.) You can also use Google Translate to help you; I do that sometimes when reviewing articles that have foreign-language sources. I hope this is helpful. Let me know if you have any further questions. /wia /talk 23:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

23:29:08, 2 June 2015 review of submission by Itscamilla
Richard A. Kimball, Jr. Draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Richard_A._Kimball,_Jr.)

Hello Wikiisawesom,

I would like to ask as to which particular part of the draft you felt was copied? We'd like to further edit our draft with your guidance.

Thank you!

Itscamilla (talk) 23:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Certainly! There are some very close similarities between the following sections:


 * "He also managed the company’s Advisory Board and Customer Excellence Forum and led the company’s first participation at the 2014 HIMSS Conference." Obviously you cannot change the proper nouns, but the sentence form and verb usage felt a little close to me.
 * "development of the start up healthcare technology business. HEXL develops population health programs focused on keeping the chronically ill stable, at home and out of the hospital." This is also very similar to the LinkedIn page, aside from a few words you've changed.


 * Keep working on the draft, and don't be discouraged if you're asked to make further changes! /wia /talk 23:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:43:20, 3 June 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mktkt
Hi. I'd like to request the deletion of the draft for "Holland Electronics". There aren't any good references or sources to justify notability. My mistake for ever getting it started. Sorry. Thanks. Mktkt (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Mktkt (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Free Grace Alliance Article
Hi, you declined my submission stating that I need to cite reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in detail. I found this article in wikipedia about Grace Evangelical Society and noticed that all the references used are also primary sources, not secondary. Can you give suggestions on how I can improve my article and get it published even if the sources are mainly primary? Thanks!

GraceTheology (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Decline for multiple reasons
Hi Wia, I think it will be useful if there is a feature allowing us to decline a submission for multiple reasons just like we tag articles for speedies with twinkle. I know we can raise the other issues in comment but submitter may not take the comment seriously and may only fix issues, for which the draft was declined, and next time it will get declined anyway, wasting lot of time. What do you think? - Supdiop  talk  14:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hm, that's not a bad idea! I don't know much about how it could be implemented, but I suggest you mention it at WT:AFCH, which is where we often discuss the Helper Script. See if anyone has any suggestions there about the idea! /wia /talk 15:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * If a subject is not notable and article is written like an advertisement then draft could be declined for notability and advertising. Another example is declining for notability and copyright issues. I'll propose this feature on script's talk page soon. I've gone through the archives but there was no mention of this feature. I think it is a pretty useful feature. Thank you.- Supdiop  talk  01:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Pyle stops Article
The " Pyle stops" article is a "Things to do / Task Awaiting Attention" in the Portal:Underwater diving.

I developed this article to explain the Pyle Stops, however, Richards Pyle who discovered it by coincidence is not the main subject of the article. You moved this Article to "Richard Pyle's" bio, however, could you please return it back to "Pyle Stops" due to the following reasons:

I wrote some background about "Richard Pyle", necessary enough to build-up progressively the key behind the "Stops" named after him, so that the reader could progressively reach the aim of the article: which is the "Pyle Stops" that he discovered. The short introduction about Richad Pyle is necessary for the reader to know how did he reach such "Deep Stops" and that the reader finds out that the "Pyle Stop" it not based on mathematical model or research, but is a byproduct discovery by Dr. Richards after his research dives. I did not write more about Richard Pyle as a biologist or researcher, which could be a separate long article, but have only wrote what I believe is necessary to clarify the origin of the "Pyle Stops" practice, so divers could make up their minds if they decide to follow it.

I have already contacted Dr. Richard in Hawaii and invited him to review this draft with me. So, again, this article is not about "Richard Pyle", but about the "Stops" he discovered, so please move back this article to "Pyle Stops", instead of "Richard Pyle", and thanks in advance :) Yahia Mokhtar User_talk:Yahia.Mokhtar  — Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jochen Sachse (musician)
Audiofreund 13:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Hi Wikiisawesome, thanks for reading my article about Jochen Sachse. I wrote this article for the german wiki and thought it would be interesting for the english-speaking community, too. In the german wiki, there where no problems regarding the quality or significance of my references. I have spent an hour to find some more links - sadly without success. Just found a german newspaper article which was published on his companys homepage, but that is truly no third-party reference ... Could you, or somebody else of this awesome community, give me some suggestions how to make my article wiki-compatible? I thought about contacting the bands and musicians he worked for in order to get some proofs for his contribution to their work, is that an accepted reference?

Request on 18:40:58, 5 June 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Kelseyburns
The Wikipedia page Pros Vs. Heroes was denied and I am confused on what I can do to help fix it and then get it published. If you can explain what I am lacking and missing that would be great.

Kelseyburns (talk) 18:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

05:47:49, 9 June 2015 review of submission by Rockyinboxersblow
Hello- I just wanted to possibly get some tips on how to improve the page I submitted for "Bedgear." I understand that the original version submitted a few months back contained a lot of advertising language and required further references- I'm just curious if there is anything in particular that I can improve upon for a future edit since I added additional references and attempted to keep the tone neutral. I truly appreciate any help that you can provide.

Thank you

Rockyinboxersblow (talk) 05:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Peter Azur
Thank you for your well-reasoned and helpful response. I think we both realize that Azur's contribution to cinematic history ranks somewhat short of stellar. I tend to agree with you on all points you raised, particularly the notability requirement. We'll simply abandon this mini-project unless you can locatelocate an interested third-party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.149.248 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

15:00:21, 16 June 2015 review of submission by Pegmoody
I updated the wiki page 19 days ago; can you please re-review it and let me know if it's now ok? Thank you... Pegmoody (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Peggy Moody

Pegmoody (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

13:09:51, 30 June 2015 review of submission by Mattyp783
Hi - I have made a number of edits and resubmitted weeks ago. I'm not sure what can be done to expedite the process but would appreciate it the page could be approved son.

Mattyp783 (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:50:05, 10 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by SVTechITSec
Hello - Can the Wikipedia page on 'CAI Networks' that references AVANU who acquired their products be a reliable (verifiable) reference source? Thank you.

SVTechITSec (talk) 17:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

07:00:01, 18 June 2015 review of submission by 2602:306:CF5B:9710:64F5:A6A4:A672:AC77
I am not sure why this keeps being denied. She has an IMDB page and a french Wiki Page. I would like one in English for her. 2602:306:CF5B:9710:64F5:A6A4:A672:AC77 (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You should add reliable sources to the draft. IMBD is not reliable source because it is user generated. You should add published sources like news and books, then it will be accepted. Anyway, you may never see this this comment. Supdiop ( Talk 🔹 Contribs ) 21:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

06:06:09, 24 August 2015 review of submission by Melissademetriou
Hi Wikiisaawesome, thank you for reviewing my article! I was just wondering if you could please shed some light on what I am doing wrong? I'm so sorry, this is all new to me.

Thanks so much

Melissademetriou (talk) 06:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Melissademetriou (talk) 06:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

.
I hope you will change your mind and come back to Wikipedia soon. Supdiop ( Talk 🔹 Contribs ) 21:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I may have time to return to Wikipedia now; maybe we'll run into each other over at AfC! /wia /talk 20:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yay! Hi Wikiisawesome, welcome back. I've been waiting for you to come back, at last you came back. Happy editing! Supdiop ( Talk / Contribs ) 02:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

20:29:43, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Mbabco
I got to this page by clicking on the "ask the reviewer that declined your submission," Apologies if I should be asking elsewhere.

You rejected the article because of copyright violation(s), which I believe I have fixed.

Before re-submitting, I wanted to make sure that you thought the article met Wikipedia's notability requirements. Most of the article is sourced from one book on the artist: "Susan Seddon Boulet: A Retrospective." I was unable to find very many other citations (just a couple of interviews with the artist, only one of which is available on YouTube at this time).

There have been 4 published books (including the Retrospective book) that are wholly devoted to the artist's art and there are numerous books (7 are cited in the article) that feature her art, including a book by Ursula K. Le Guin. It would seem as if this would make her notable. However, if the article as written does not meet the notability requirements perhaps I should: 1) Not re-submit at this time until more citations are found, or; 2) Re-write and shorten the article focusing more on the content of the 4 published books featuring her art.

Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you in advance. Mbabco (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for asking. This is indeed a fine place to ask!


 * The copyright issues appear to be resolved. As for notability, my first step in reviewing is to look for copyright issues, so I didn't assess the article for notability. However, a quick look seems to indicate that you've met the general notability criteria, and so I think this artist is notable. I notice that there are not inline citations after some claims about the subject that need to be verified, per Wikipedia's minimum referencing policy. For example, when you say "Throughout the 1970's her themes were largely medieval, fairy tales and fantasy; there were mermaids, musicians, a child in flowers, unicorns, nixies, jesters, knights, kings and queens, colorful processions and black women in Brazilian dress (Bahiana)", this needs an inline citation so as not to look like original research, which is prohibited on Wikipedia.


 * I think once you've worked on that, you can try resubmitting the article. As always, if you have further questions, you're welcome to inquire at the AfC Help Desk. /wia /talk 20:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. Much appreciated. Mbabco (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheval du Morvan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chassy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

08:21:03, 8 October 2015 review of submission by Nmazz
Hey there Wikkiawesome, I recently got assigned this page by my boss and have been updating it to the my ability based on your original reasons for declining. Having very little experiences updating and working on articles before it would be a great help to me if you could review it and give me breakdown of the edits I've made so far and what still needs to be done and what I am doing wrong. Thanks for all your help! :)


 * First, if you are editing a page as part of your work duties, you need to take a look at the paid-editing disclosure policy on Wikipedia. This is important because it implicates legal policy.


 * As for the article, what you generally need to meet is either the general notability criteria or the notability criteria for artists. If you can show either one, then notability will have been demonstrated for the artist. Primary sources, like the artist's own website or social media pages, are not sufficient to show notability. You can use them sparingly, but for notability purposes, you have to find reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Of the non-primary sources you've used, it seems to me that the Discover Jersey Arts is the best of them; the others aren't very useful because they seem to have been written by Wagner himself. (There are "About Me" sections and the like which indicate this.) Discover Jersey Arts is a start, but more will need to be found. If you have further questions, you can always drop by with specific questions at the AfC Help Desk. Thanks! /wia /talk 14:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

What would be a reputable company source to cite?
Hi there, thanks for reviewing my page. I am really struggling to get this through review. I have cited Companies House information as a legal, notable source of the companies history but I'm not sure what else I can do to get the page through review! I have never submitted an article to Wikipedia before and finding it quite hard! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PBernfeld (talk • contribs) 15:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, I assume you are talking about User:PBernfeld/sandbox. The problem with the Companies House websites as sources is that they don't offer any substantial coverage of the company. It's just a bit of legal filing information like location, incorporation date and the like. There's no substantial coverage there about Hambro.


 * The sorts of references Wikipedia needs to show notability are detailed at WP:CORPDEPTH. Take a look; newspaper or magazine articles about the company and the like are a good place to start. WP:RS is another place to look for general information about reliable sources if you are confused. I took a look myself and didn't see much online that would show notability. However, if you can find some good sources, there is a chance that the article might pass muster.


 * If you have further specific questions, you can always ask at the AfC Help Desk. Thanks, /wia /talk 15:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

My explanations
I explained my actions over the past few days on my talk page. Please read if you want to. Thanks Supdiop ( T 🔹 C ) 11:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notice; I hope you're doing okay. Good to have you back in the Wikipedia saddle! /wia /talk 12:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry
I thought I removed the edits I made by myself but perhaps I didn't. Thanks for doing it for me. 92.1.122.227 (talk) 09:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 92.1.122.227

Some stroopwafels for you!

 * Thank you! I was just starting to get hungry. /wia /talk 14:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Ricky Martin question
Hi Wikiiaweseome,

If public figures have come out, and identify as LGBT, IMHO this should be noted in the very beginning. It is National Coming Out Day today, and if people have already come out in the media, they should be out on Wikipedia for the new generations of LGBT kids--particularly LGBT kids of color who get even more pressure to stay in the closet--should see this first thing. I do not know if the LGBT Wikipedia group has discussed this issue or not, but I believe it is a worthy discussion to have.

Sincerely, RachelWex — Preceding unsigned comment added by RachelWex (talk • contribs) 15:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree it is important to note LGBT people who have come out on Wikipedia! However, I'm not sure that the first sentence is the place to put it, per WP:MOSLEAD. However, it is worth having a discussion about. As such, we should follow the "be bold", revert, discuss procedure and talk about it with other editors on the talk page. Thanks! /wia /talk 15:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi Wia, See your email. Cheers Supdiop ( T 🔹 C ) 02:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks. I just replied a few hours ago. /wia /talk 03:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

hii
Swimming and Sky diving Walter Ascent (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I know what this is referring to, sorry! /wia /talk 16:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
thank you

Hus1234 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC) 

myself
Ka Kabbirul miah (talk) 17:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)