User talk:Wickepedia

National varieties of English
In a recent edit to the page Sistine Chapel, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   16:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sistine Chapel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sistine Chapel was changed by Wickepedia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899881 on 2016-03-11T16:26:12+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sistine Chapel with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.  General Ization  Talk   16:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)