User talk:Wickname

Speedy deletion nomination of Emineuweb
Hello Wickname,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Emineuweb for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Wickname! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 00:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Talkback
Vanjagenije (talk) 09:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Vanjagenije (talk) 14:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emi•Neu•Web


A tag has been placed on Emi•Neu•Web requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 17:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * When adding sources to demonstrate the notability of a subject, the sources must mention the subject itself, not just material related to the subject. In other words, the UN reports must mention Emi•Neu•Web by name, not just the areas it is involved with, for the notability requirement to be met. —C.Fred (talk) 18:44, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

It's a bad idea to write an article about an organization you're involved in
Hello, Wickname. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Emi•Neu•Web, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

answer
I've stayed as objective as possible without any flattering of the organization. My intent is to start a discussion on the topic. The organization is somehow different from already known environmetal organizations such as Greenpeace and therefore perhaps interesting to know about or discuss.--Wickname (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Interesting to know about is not the same as notable, though. Would you like the article moved to Draft space so you can work on it with less fear of deletion? —C.Fred (talk) 18:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)