User talk:Wickymimi

Welcome!

Hello, Wickymimi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mimi mollica, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sparthorse (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Mimi mollica


A tag has been placed on Mimi mollica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sparthorse (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Photowrap


A tag has been placed on Photowrap, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Copy from article talk page and comment
Copy Since Wikipedia users are anonymous, we don't have any evidence to back up your claim. I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying we can't know for sure that you are the author of that page, as you claim. Since copyright is a legal issue, I'm sure you'll understand why Wikipedia can't just take your word.


 * In order for the material to be included, you'd have to make your page available under an appropriate license, ideally CC-BY-SA. That would allow not just Wikipedia, but anyone to use your text for any purpose. Please be sure you understand the implications of this before granting such a license. If you do want to release your text under a license, update the source web page to have explicitly release it under that license. Then the text can be used to form the basis of a Wikipedia article. You should also read the following Wikipedia rules: conflicts of interest, verifiability and neutral point of view. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2011 (UTC) End copy
 * I would add to that look at WP:BIO and WP:RS. You must have independent reliable sources to back up what you say. Your site does not cont as reliable, and nor do interviews, blogs, forums, wikis (even this one), Twitter, Facebook etc. If you look at WP:COPYVIO, it will point you to the licensing procedure as well as explaining our policy. But, if you can't provide RS, it's not worth bothering. Peridon (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)