User talk:Wickypears/sandbox

Dkitch21 Peer Review
I like your articles, you have a decent amount available to pull from and add to your article DKitch21 (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Some hyperlinks to other articles will help clarify terms, and maybe making the synthesis image smaller? Its kind of massive and take away from the rest of the information you are giving. Taking some time to add information in the medical uses based on the biophysical aspects of the drug, like how it works if you know? or just say the the mechanism of action is unknown. All in all, it looks good and adding a little more detail here and there will make it look even better! DKitch21 (talk) 17:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Narvikvaren Peer Review
You've got lot's of material here! Looks like you've got a lot you can do with this Narvikvaren (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Looks like a couple of good changes. "affective" should be "effective" the way it's used. Narvikvaren (talk) 02:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC) You've done some extensive work here, looks like you'll be adding quite a bit to the page, that's awesome! Narvikvaren (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC) The Figure looks great! It's very clear and will make a good addition to the article. The added side-effects are also a great addition. Narvikvaren (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Instead of "less symptoms than its sister drug" it would read more clearly if it said "fewer symptoms" or "less severe symptoms." I'm unsure by what is meant by "less" Narvikvaren (talk) 03:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

-Thank you! I changed it to fewer symptoms and I agree, it reads much easier. Wickypears (talk) 03:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Awesome! I filled out a peer review sheet from wikipedia. I'll link it here The article looks great! I'm excited to see it up Narvikvaren (talk) 14:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

It looks great uploaded to the main page. There's nothing else I would change. The figures look great! Narvikvaren (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)