User talk:Widr/Archive 54

User talk:107.1.99.186 has discussion archives
I have discussion archives and I can't write in the discussions in the div and can't type sigma and Cobi hasn't been editing in 30 days. You need to operate WidrBot so it can archive my discussions. --107.1.99.186 13:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Recent block
Hi, thanks for blocking this IP. However, you forgot to notify them about the block. I've done so for you, but just wanted to drop you a note. Cheers. 24.91.249.202 (talk) 00:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Notifying blocked user
Please see Notifying the blocked user. I've noticed here and there that you are not leaving a notice on the blocked user's talk page about the block. The template serves as a notification of the block, instructions on how they can appeal the block, and for any additional action by a subsequent admin. You blocked User talk:73.96.83.16 on August 22, but did not leave a block notice on their talk page. As a consequence, they just continued to edit, but did it on their talk page, which was reported at RFPP. I sort of jiggled a template a little to give you credit for the block, but also notifying them that their talk page privileges were revoked. — Maile (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Reverted back to the anonblock template (also tp access revoked now). Widr (talk) 21:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * OK. The anonblock template wasn't there when I saw it on RFPP.  I guess it got lost in all the reverting and re-reverting by whoever.  Thanks for taking care of it so quickly. — Maile  (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

A Favor
Would it be at all possible if you could hide the edits made at Evolution of cetaceans from 13 August 2017 to 28 August 2017? On the 13th, an IP-hopping, longterm vandal who's been putting in "derpwhale" vandalisms put in a fake reference that has a link to a malware site, and today, I undid that, but then it was brought to my attention that readers looking through the edit history can still access said malware site.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Silvertears123
Hi Widr, Could I ask that be's unblocked please ?- Only simple reason is that having searched "Melissa Bell" online she has actually died - The edit could've been done better but unfortunately it wasn't vandalism, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 16:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for kindly unblocking and again my apologies (although easy mistake to make), Anyway thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:40, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

IP 2600:387:2:803:0:0:0:B0
Hi Widr. The block you placed on has run out, but it appears they are back and doing what they did before. Blocking this person does not seem to be having any effect, so perhaps WP:PP will be a better way to prevent any further disruption. Perhaps all of 's archive could be protected since they seem to be the pages targeted by this person. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Somcable Telecommunications
Hello, I see you dealt with User:Somcable Telecommunications a few months ago. We have a new contributor User:Somcable Provider Telecommunications with a similar editing pattern. I've reverted the edits but I'm not really sure how best to go about investigating or reporting this sort of activity, so any advice or help would be welcome. Thanks, Certes (talk) 23:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked by another admin a few minutes after I wrote that. Sorry for troubling you. Certes (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Sock
This is a WP:DUCK sock of this account. SwisterTwister  talk  19:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for all the anti-vandal blocking that you do. 24.91.248.60 (talk) 21:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks also
For mopping out that JasonKingSmith character and their general dumbassery, whatever his name was. They are persistent I'll give em that. Take care! &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  11:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Smile!
 Hello Widr, Dinah Kirkland has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. ♠Dinah♠ 🎤 13:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Look What You Made Me Do
Just letting you know, I already updated the Finnish download peak to the main chart on Look What You Made Me Do here, but it was changed again. The commented-out message underneath was not in relation to the Finnish chart, it was in relation to another user removing the French chart beneath it.  Ss 112  19:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

A "barnstar" for you!

 * Mate he's blocking 'em before they even have a chance to hit refresh :D &mdash;  fortuna  velut luna  11:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Aww, thanks! That's the cutest barnstar ever :) Widr (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/195.29.86.210 ...
... is with all probability Sockpuppet investigations/Benniejets, and since it geolocates to Croatia (and not Italy, as one would expect) it is also probably an open proxy (the edits from 30 August, 06:01-06:33UTC on 31 August and all edits made 3-5 September are Bennie, but the other edits don't look at all like Bennie). So I've had them on my watchlist for a couple of days, to see if they would do something that would really give them away. Just FYI... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 17:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I modified the block a bit. Widr (talk) 17:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocked user
I wanted to bring this user to your attention in case you hadn't seen it. 2600:387:2:813:0:0:0:64 (talk) 02:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Edit request on Air India
Hello, Widr! I want to request you to revert YSSYguy's edit on Air India to last good version by Freightcar2. I cannot edit that protected page and I please with love want you to do it. I warned YSSYguy on talk page just now. Please revert his edit tomorrow. With so much love, Freightcar2 (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Reply in both boxes

Fix Air India:

Block 82.32.116.24 Freightcar2 (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

AIV
Please see my report about the IP on AIV. Personal attacks/vandalism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Please consider REVDELing the edits too as attempted outing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * They IP-hopped to Special:Contributions/107.77.223.217 — might need a temporary rangeblock. on the 223.* range. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Block user 82.32.116.24
Hello Widr! I request you to block Special Cobtributions/82.32.116.24 for CheckUser and anonblock. He keeps reverting my true edits and I am not lying. With love, Freightcar2 (talk) 22:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Seems like Freightcar2 tried to block the IP themself, by adding a block notice on their talk page, and a CU-tag on their user page. Which together with their behaviour in general here hints at a lack of competence... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 20:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've got my eyes on this one, the more I look, the more it appears that there is a sockfarm of a globally locked sockmaster. Will probably raise a SPI over the weekend. Thanks for ignoring the request, Widr. I've suggested a remedy at talk:Air India, which will be put into action Monday morning should Freightcar2 fail to respond to the request for sources to back their edits up. Mjroots (talk) 09:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you as well, for keeping me busy. Widr (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

IP vandal at it again
Here's one that needs a block: User_talk:165.139.46.17 - you've warned them as have others but this month they've ramped up their activity a bit. It's rather obvious they're not here to build an encyclopedia. Atsme 📞📧 16:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

RevDel request
Could you please delete this grossly offensive revision by a user you just blocked. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocks
Do you even do your own check before acting on an AIV report? Why on earth are you blocking accounts such as Special:Contributions/67.43.19.24, which has made one edit and no filter logs in five months and was last given anything higher than a level one warning in 2015, or Special:Contributions/169.227.254.9, which has made only one edit (and two filter logs on the same edit) in four months, with no warnings higher than a level one since then? You really ought to know better than that, and I recommend that you go back through all the blocks you made based on that IP's AIV reports and give a good hard think at which ones are actually justified, then unblock the ones that aren't. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using  in your reply. 19:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for asking, and yes, I check them. Those are school blocks or anon blocks. Most have gone straight from one block to another with escalating lengths. When we have months/years worth of clear evidence that there's nothing constructive coming, the bar for (re)blocking should be lower. At least by common sense, which is what I use. Widr (talk) 19:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I feel like it's a philosophical difference between us. I'll rarely block for an unconstructive edit every few months, even with a couple past blocks, while your threshold seems to be much lower. To me, reverts are cheap, while blocks potentially block good faith contributors as well, so for infrequent vandlism I'll just revert and warn instead of issuing a block, which I save for spurts of vandalism. I think for me it goes back to if every admin issued school and anon blocks left and right like they're a dime a dozen I wouldn't be here; I got started on Wikipedia making anonymous contributions from school, and a school block of my school would likely have never had me get my start editing. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using  in your reply. 20:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure we all could just warn the vandals up to level 4 once a week and let them always get away with it without ever getting blocked. I don't see how that would benefit the Wikipedia and its reputation, though. It would be waste of time for everyone, especially for those of us who try to keep the site clean of vandals. Innocent school kids can always create accounts at home and then log in. These blocks only prevent anonymous vandalism. Widr (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

ANI
At ANI there is a report of what looks like a hacked page, and I don't just mean vandalized. The thread is "something strange". Tornado chaser (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No idea what that's about. Widr (talk) 17:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Whatever it was has been fixed, but there is nothing in the edit history to suggest there was anything wrong. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The problem apperes to have been a vandalized template. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that was my thought too when I started reading your posts. Does the template need to be protected? - BilCat (talk) 18:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It's been protected by now (see the ANI thread). Widr (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Outing issue
There is an ANI thread here that involves outing issues, I have contacted you as you are the most recently active admin. Tornado chaser (talk) 18:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please block this user from editing their talk page as this IP is playing with it and blanking all the previous warnings that were given. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

AIV
Please to your attention. Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RamazanKhan1991 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Non contrivirsial move
What made you think that moving Bosnian Genocide to Bosnian genocide was non-controversial? 

Also why did you not move the 9 archives when you moved the talk page Talk:Bosnian Genocide/Archive 9?

-- PBS (talk) 16:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Probably because of the rationale linked in the diff. As for the archives, no idea. It's hard to remember why I didn't do something 17 months ago. Widr (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Please move the archives across (per the guidance in Moving a page).
 * Just because someone asks for a non-controversial move does not mean that it is non-controversial. The question is whether the subject is a proper noun or a description. That is a very big change and for subjects like genocide and they are always controversial, so it needs a RM to decide if a move one way or the other is justified. -- PBS (talk) 07:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested Intervention on Westerhout 5
Widr, There is a new editor who has just reverted the article for a second time on Westerhout 5. I have explained why thus was reverted twice, stating the name given is not common nor cited. I'm sure this added name is fictional, and a simple Goggle reach finds nothing. I'm unsure how to act here without a 3RR violation myself. The edits are here. Could you intercede here please. Thanks. Arianewiki1 (talk) 08:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You should discuss this with the editor. Their talk page is red. Widr (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quick Block
Special:Contributions/Crawford9999 Long-term abuse/Ananny

Probably stale, but eh, a socks a sock. Stikkyy t/c 04:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Help
Help! This is User:Terahfrancisco has been Vandalism and Removal Content, but User:Terahfrancisco has been personal attacks But will be blocked for User:Terahfrancisco has been vandalism. read this, see Sockpuppet investigations/Terahfrancisco and got these another User:Terahfrancisco is Sockpuppet, Please help. LG-Gunther : Talk  07:25, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Widr. We Save for life again, Do You have this delete this Contributions and Summaries like personal attacks of User:Terahfrancisco. please, will be delete this contributions. Thanks. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I didn't notice any personal attacks that should be deleted or hidden, though. Widr (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
kind of indicates more action would be appropriate. Toddst1 (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

never saw it done that way before
with an expiration time of 4 years, 365 days, 43 minutes and 12 seconds? Perfect.Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, that is 5 years, but it always shows it like that. Widr (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Page protection
Hi Widr, can you protect the Neyland Stadium page? Thanks. -KH-1 (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Admin needed
This page was made by a vandal. It will be self explanatory once you click on it:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Propane_and_Propane_Accessories&redirect=no →Pocketthis (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As an admin, I can say that is definitely not made by a vandal. If you feel that the redirect is not needed, you're welcome to open discussion with the user who made it.  only (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd agree it's a valid redirect - but it is a bit obscure, and relies on prior knowledge of the show in order to understand. Blimey - a lot of stalkers around today, eh?  Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * As a registered member for 7 years, I can tell you that this is a "Hank Hill" commercial. We don't sell Propane accessories on this site last time I checked. Users and vandals have been messing with the "Propane article" for years promoting that show. Time to end this nonsense. That edit to make the Hank Hill link, created that "Propane accessories Page". Pocketthis (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * again, you're welcome to raise those thoughts with the user who created it, on the talk page for the redirect, or in an WP:RFD. This is not vandalism though and no admin action is needed at this time. only (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you as well for all your reports! Widr (talk) 16:49, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Not sure what's going on with all these proxies suddenly coming up today, but thanks very much for blocking them in no time! -★- PlyrStar93 . → Message me. ← 01:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, seems like we had a mass attack or something, proxies popped up everywhere on Saturday. Jdcomix (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)