User talk:Widy9

Welcome
Hello  and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.  ''Click here to reply to this message.''  ukexpat (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project
A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements. I noticed you were concerned with copyvio and did some constructive work to remove copy and paste issues (Gatwick_Express), thanks. Lucas559 (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anti-oppressive practice has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anti-oppressive practice was changed by Widy9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951432 on 2015-07-30T09:52:59+00:00.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates (such as welcome templates and user warnings) on talk pages, as you did to User talk:Ash12192, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use instead of. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. Conifer (talk ) 17:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright on Wikipedia
Hello, Widy9.

Investigating the copyright concerns flagged at Thomas Harrison (minister), I see your note at its talk page. The DNB can be used, as it is public domain. I'm afraid the material marked was not taken from the DNB, though, but rather too closely followed The Encyclopedia of Virginia. This content is not public domain by age, and we cannot retain material from that source without verification that it is public domain or compatibly licensed.

For an example:

I realize that you cited your source, but unfortunately this alone does not permit us to copy or closely paraphrase it. We can use explicitly marked quotations from our sources, as long as we have good reason such as those set out at the non-free content policy and guideline, but aside from brief and clearly marked quotations used transformatively, all information we take from non-free sources must be put into our own words and structure.

If you can verify that this material is public domain or compatibly licensed, we can certainly make use of it, just as we do the DNB, so long as it is attributed similarly to denote that we have closely followed the source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)