User talk:Wies6014

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! Tom (LT) (talk) 06:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Layers of retina on OCT
Hi Wies, thanks very much for improving the article.

You make a very valid point. Also, the references you're quoting are from 2017 (vs mine was from 2014). You're as much of an authority as anyone on here to make the changes you mentioned. Undoubtedly there will be another article in a few months time which adds another few layers to the OCT image, most likely as a result of investigators using an ultra-high-resolution Heidelberg or something, and someone may dispute the accuracy of the OCT table. But for now, I'd say you've just cited the most up-to-date evidence available on the topic.

So I'd just encourage you to just make all the changes you mentioned (including splitting the RPE/Bruch's into 3 separate layers), and see how things evolve in the future.

Thanks again,

Vitreology (talk) 10:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC)