User talk:Wiesebc3532

Welcome!
Hello, Wiesebc3532, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review of Ceruminous adenocarcinoma Epidemiology section
I would not start out the article with the word “with”. Moreover, given that it is the first sentence of your section, I would make it even stronger in terms of wording. I would say that the sentence regarding treatment is irrelevant to your epidemiology section. I also would say that the last four sentences of your paragraph do not belong to the epidemiology section of your section but rather in the opening of the original wikipedia article. Your article is neutral with no bias. There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Regarding the citations you do have, the sources do support the claims. The links work. Regarding reliable references (internal citations), I believe you are supposed to cite every sentence, even if consecutive sentences are from the same source, if you did not come up with the sentence on your own. The sources you do have listed are neutral. The information appears up to date. Furthermore, since this tumor is not common, I would add information on any individual studies you found for CA (even outside the US) regarding any epidemiological information such as incidence rates, risk factors, etc. This would help added to your list of references to strengthen your section. Blugold763 (talk) 23:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)