User talk:WikIan/Archive 2

Orphaned non-free image File:Outlook People.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Outlook People.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:O365 calendar.png
 Thanks for uploading File:O365 calendar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:O365 Outlook Calendar.png
 Thanks for uploading File:O365 Outlook Calendar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 10.40.49 AM.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 10.40.49 AM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MWSS
Template:MWSS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:O365 Outlook Calendar.png
 Thanks for uploading File:O365 Outlook Calendar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 10.40.49 AM.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 10.40.49 AM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Outlook People.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Outlook People.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Ians18! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:29, Friday, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Peremptory close of Mount McKinley move
This move was closed by you 62 minutes after it was proposed. I am inclined to contest it. Four editors voted, including one whose sole explanation was "Down with the oppressor". You provided no rationale for this abrupt closure. Please provide one now. Thanks. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There was clear consensus, in addition I am coming from a neutral point of view. As such, Wikipedia clearly states that discussions are allowed to be closed. This should be non-controversial because it was stated by the president of the United States. That is the official name, thus I do not believe that this should be controversial. If you would like, you could open a move request to go the other direction. However, the move was already carried out by the time I got there. WikIan (talk) 02:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * - please read the instructions at WP:RM, particularly as regard to closing. Requested move discussion are expected to go on for at least seven days, and then a consensus established, which should be made by matching arguments to relevant policies. In particular, your argument about the President of the US is clearly not grounded in policy - WP:OFFICIALNAME is very clear on this matter - we go by the common name, as given in reliable sources, not by any "official" name. I don't know at this stage whether it's right or wrong to move to Denali, but I'd ask you to please reopen this move request, and allow it to run its course, otherwise the close will have to be contested at WP:Move review. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 20:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * , I see you like to use WP:RM. However, I did not believe this was controversial at all. In addition I did not move the page. When I arrived, the page had been moved, so I closed the discussion. Therefore, by guidelines I should not reopen the discussion and you should contest it by opening a move request of your own. Thanks, WikIan (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

This move was completely improper. A controversial move request is supposed to be open for at least 7 days. Please revert the move and reopen the discussion immediately. Article titles are the common name, not the official name, of a topic. What the current common name of this topic is is very controversial. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably didn't realize it'd be controversial, since it seems like common sense. Anyway, it doesn't matter since the issue is up for discussion again Talk:Denali and most people support the current name overwhelmingly.   D r e a m Focus  22:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * "completely improper..move and reopen immediately" No it's not. Please see WP:5P5. In addition, Ii did not realize this move request would be controversial. Also,, you are violating the guidelines to assume edits are in good faith as well as respect others. WikIan (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I accept your argument that you acted in good faith, and that's fine - I understand what you're saying. However, I don't agree with you that your action was the correct one at that time. Even if another editor has boldly moved the page, the original discussion is generally allowed to continue, as that's the official forum for discussing the move, with the discussion closed according to instructions at WP:RMC, which have been worked out through consensus. And yes, I am an active participant in that space, because I think it's an important process, and when followed properly, it avoids the kind of mess we're seeing at Talk:Denali right now, where people are talking across each other, and nobody's even sure how to proceed. A properly closed RM in which an editor provides a good summary and analyses the responses clearly, is rarely challenged. Events have moved on, so the matter of whether the original RM should be reopened is probably moot now, but I hope you'll avoid making such early closures in future. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Move review for Denali
An editor has asked for a Move review of Denali. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. VictorD7 (talk) 04:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:MWSS
Note that, per the comments on User talk:Alakzi I have rolled back some of your recent edits and deleted Template:MWSS. Regards &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Windows 10
Please add "This user contributes using Windows 10." to your user page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Why? I don't use Windows 10 to contribute. Not regularly, anyways.  WikIan - ( talk )  02:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Microsoft Surface
The report you filed at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring has been closed. You and the other party are both warned. See the report for details. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Outlook.com upgrade
Hello

I have good news. As you anticipated, Outlook.com upgrade is here. My account is upgraded today.

As you expected, there are a lot of Outlook on the web features. As I expected, the name didn't change. It is still Outlook.com. (With ".com".) I also have Tasks but that's part of the Calendar. Well, I guess paid users must feel their payment entitles them to something more! So, I guess a merger is permanently off the table.

I also received a Microsoft Exchange 2016 package. (The on-premises version we talked about.) It haven't been able to set it up yet, owning to its heavy system requirements, but it seems the Outlook Web App in it is now called "Outlook on the web". So, if you want to file a non-controversial technical rename, go ahead. (Even provide a diff to this communication as evidence.)

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * You're right, Outlook.com itself did not change names in the upgrade. However, when you login the web app should say "Outlook Mail" correct? See |hereThey way the page was moved today, I'm not sure how we are going to structure this anymore. The MWSS template, which I know was deleted, holds water if we rename the MSA portion to Outlook.com. They both have received the Outlook on the web update however.


 * I'm also not seeing Tasks as being part of Calendar. Do you see | this? Could you post a screenshot of what you are seeing, that way I can better understand what is going on. So Outlook Web app is Outlook on the web, but so is Outlook.com. They are both Outlook on the web. And how should we break down the components? Should we do something like Notes (application) does, having an infobox for both the Outlook.com version and the O365/Exchange version?  Should we create new pages? or merge/redirect? I'm assuming you have more experience in situations like these.


 * Thanks.
 *  WikIan - ( talk )  03:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi again.


 * About Outlook:
 * Your first screenshot is very close but the title bar says "Outlook.com" and the title bar background is black. There is the Skype, Settings and Help buttons, but no bell button. (Maybe that's because I don't have a pending notification?)
 * The address bar has this added to its address: "&owa=1&owasuffix=owa%2f".
 * If I open the shortcut menu, it says "Mail" instead of "Outlook.com". But I do not see "Outlook Mail" or "Mail" anywhere. It is either "Outlook" (sign-in screen) or "Outlook.com".
 * Several features of Outlook for the web are absent. I don't see retention, OAuth or EAS fetch. No MAPI-RPC access either. In general, there has been definite changes and a definite attempt to import features, but they seem to have deliberately kept it a different trademark. A screenshot from my Outlook.com is – I am very sorry to say – a big "No" because too much of my private life is at stake there. (I have heavily customized it.)


 * About Tasks: A "Tasks" button is added on the shortcut bar, to the right side of OneDrive. The Word Online button has gone to the next line. But the button sends me to: "https://bay01.calendar.live.com/calendar/calendar.aspx?rru=tasks". I can click on Calendar and switch to Tasks view to get the same results. Basically, there is nothing new. Even the title bar does not look like that of Outlook.com and OneDrive. (My OneDrive is also updated.) Maybe I should wait?


 * In general, you have a lot of freedom and source material to request a rename Outlook Web App to Outlook on the web, update it and if your hunches prove to be right, make it the primary article for Microsoft's email service. In that case, Outlook.com article becomes a historic article and won't change anymore. We have this very same state in cases of Windows Defender and Microsoft Security Essentials, which cannot merge because of their different backgrounds. (Where there is contents, there is room for an article.) The same applies to Opera Mini and Opera Mobile. Also to Macromedia and Adobe.


 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 12:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * So my main account's OneDrive menu has also been updated to include tasks, and it says Mail. Also "Tasks" point to where your link points. I think they are in the process of updating all accounts and switching it over to O365's infrastructure, and this is a stop-gap measure in the meantime. I know you don't see the new Outlook branding yet, but I assure you it will come as they have removed "Outlook.com" from the menu.
 *  WikIan - ( talk )  20:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your OneDrive is updated but not your Outlook? —Codename Lisa (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * For my main account, yes which is really weird. My second account (the one I've posted screenshots of) has been updated fully and for quite some time.  WikIan - ( talk )  17:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, it appears that even more people are seeing the Outlook Mail branding on their Outlook.com account as retweeted by Brad Sams.  WikIan - ( talk )  00:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I am glad. This screen photo looks very much like mine. Except I have the color categories feature but the shot does not. Also my title bar does not say "Outlook Mail (Preview)". I'll keep an eye for the mainstream media writing more about this. One of them is bound become our source. It is fortunate this one didn't turn out one of Microsoft's abortive or semi-abortive efforts (although Microsoft still has time). Microsoft has aborted a number of projects recently, including the Android app compatibility layer for Windows 10 Mobile.


 * On a side note, Microsoft has announced a project to bring Win32 apps to Windows 10 Mobile. If that happens, Windows 10 Mobile officially becomes a version of Windows NT. (I am serious about the "officially" part because one of the requirements is to announce an NT version string to those apps.)


 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 02:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * To be fair, the Islandwood Project (iOS Bridge) is still active and it could have been legal or technical reasons that Microsoft couldn't complete Astoria. Anyways, I'd much prefer having iOS ported apps rather than ported Android apps, which also turned off a lot of W10M devs.  WikIan - ( talk )  02:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Outlook Calendar logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Outlook Calendar logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Microsoft People icon.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Microsoft People icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Windows 10 Mobile: Does my eyes deceive me?
Hi.

I know we had severe disagreements in the past but revision 705987854 in Windows 10 Mobile is a little more than that: You have removed 13 references with not even an explanation! Had an IP editor did, I'd have called it a vandalism!

Care to explain?

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * This is my fault, I removed them because they were causing "citation errors" in the previewer saying they weren't defined. I believed they weren't referenced correctly, as it wasn't immediately clear they were defined in other sections.
 *  WikIan - ( talk )  20:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Cybersites for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Cybersites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Cybersites until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Outlook Mail Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Outlook Mail Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Outlook Tasks Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Outlook Tasks Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Outlook Tasks Preview.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Outlook Tasks Preview.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

NFCC
Hi.

Have you ever heard of WP:NFCC? Take a look at it. Pay close attention to its article #1.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have a "free" image in mind, then be my guest. The biggest issue here is both the Khan academy app and the Wikipedia app both were developed for Windows 8 as Windows Runtime 8.x apps, thus they are not UWP apps.  WikIan - ( talk )  08:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you know about NFCC? Good. But the crazy part about it is that sometimes it demands people to travel to North Korea in hopes of getting a glimpse of its leader instead of using a non-free image of him. I've got used to it. Still, this case isn't that crazy. The UWP vs. WinRT distinction isn't something that demands a new screenshot. And even if it did, you could have taken a screenshot of a non-free UWP app and a free Windows app, which isn't the case with your shot.


 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 08:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to clarify (and hope you understand) that the captions on the current images are wrong.  WikIan - ( talk )  01:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I looked at Khan Academy's source code once before. I think it was a UWP app. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The Khan app was created for the WinRT platform and I believe it was never updated to UWP. Plus, it's being discontinued. The easiest way to tell is by this dropdown at the top and this app menu that replaced the Windows 8 Charms bar in Windows 10. Additionally, this source states that "if Khan Academy had supported Windows 10 via UWP..."  WikIan - ( talk )  01:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I see. Then I might have been wrong.
 * Although MSPowerUser's sentence is a bit misleading: UWP apps can target desktop only; or target desktop, Xbox and HoloLens without targeting mobile. If I had more time these days, I'd have skimmed the source code again.
 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 09:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Calendar Screenshot
Hi Wiklan,

Thanks for being willing to post a screenshot of your inbox to reflect UI changes in Mail (Windows). It looks good! Would you be willing and comfortable to do the same for updating the Calendar (Windows) screenshot?

Thanks so much, Onecatowner (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, however I've been really busy (and haven't been editing much). I'll do it as soon as I have time.  WikIan - ( talk )  21:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Desktop and UWP.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Desktop and UWP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi.


 * I restored the image to the article after an admin repaired the damage to the image.


 * Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Surface Dial draft
Hi there,

I have noticed that a number of users have been working on the draft page at User:WikIan/Surface Dial, but you have hardly been active on it. To this end, it seems like moving the page to the "Draft:" namespace would be more reasonable. Would you mind if I make this move out of your userspace so that it becomes more accessible to other users?

Regards, « « «  SOME GADGET GEEK  » » » (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * Yeah, go ahead. The majority of the content was already merged into the main Microsoft Surface article under the Surface Dial section.
 *  WikIan - ( talk )  02:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

WP:NFCC
Hello.

Let's put my message into the form a quiz, just for fun: (1) Who has the most liberal view to WP:NFCC in Wikipedia? (2) Who has most recently posted WikiLove to you? (3) Who have you most recently attacked personally even though that person didn't comment on your person? The answer all three is: Codename Lisa! Your NFCC violation is so severe that even Codename Lisa doesn't approve, and you add insult to the injury with personal attack and playing fool. It is high time you take one good hard look at what you did. And if you don't want people to avoid you, well stop acting like morons. What makes you think morons have an advantage in Wikipedia anyway?

 Fleet  Command ( Speak your mind! ) 14:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want to patch things up with Codename Lisa, you can. Start by acknowledging the problem.  Fleet  Command ( Speak your mind! ) 14:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WindowsInstallerv1703.png
 Thanks for uploading File:WindowsInstallerv1703.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Surface Laptop on Surface Timeline
Hi WikIan. It would be great if you could add the Surface Laptop under Template:Surface timeline. The device begins shipping on June 15, 2017. Thanks!

Daylen (talk) 19:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: Windows 10 build titles
Please do not unilaterally make a controversial change to a long-standing aspect of the article without gaining consensus first. Thank you.

ViperSnake151  Talk  05:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi ViperSnake151,
 * I find it hard to believe you're not familiar with WP:CYCLE. It shouldn't cause any consensus issues anyways due to WP:COMMONNAME and the fact that a similar reference scheme is used in Windows 10 version history
 *  WikIan - ( talk )  05:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That page is subject to different consensus and practices. ViperSnake151   Talk  05:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * , are you aware of these so-called "different practices"?  WikIan - ( talk )  07:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * In way. The consensus established is the weakest form of consensus: Silence. I remember another dispute, but I am not aware of a more conclusive consensus. So, you two seem to have dispute. —Codename Lisa (talk) 08:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

File:User Account Control.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:User Account Control.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

File:DVD Player (Windows 10) icon.png
Hello.

Since the equivalent of this file on Commons is already deleted as non-free, putting a PD-textlogo in is ignoring precedent. At least, not without a discussion in FFD.

Also, as I understand, being composed from simple shapes isn't enough. It must be a simple shape.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * Funny you should say that, over at Commons the user who deleted the file stated they did not want a duplicate here of Fair Use items. In actuality, I believe that this icon is already in the public domain. I am using this icon: File:CarCreditCity.png as a precedent. It is not simply a geometric shape. Neither is the Windows Update logo over at Commons, which is in the public domain.  WikIan  - ( talk )  07:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "Funny" is the word. He says "From my understanding, the file should be brought to FFD at Wikipedia, and restored here if the decision at Wikipedia is to delete" even though in almost every other respect, I disagree with him.
 * Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

File:User Account Control.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:User Account Control.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (TV (software)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating TV (software), WikIan!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please see WP:DDD and WP:INCOMPDAB."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Do not do that
Well that was fairly stupid; you pretty much just shot your entire complain in the foot. It is not OK to link to a bunch of vandalism attacking another editor, and express support for it. If you do it again, I will block you from editing. Is that clear? --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I support absolutely no harassment or vandalism of any kind. I absolutely would never to that to anybody. I was simply pointing out evidence that I am not the sole target or (what some people believe) the perpetrator here. I was simply pointing out others obviously felt this way, and I have followed the guidelines to the best of my knowledge, where some people are acting like WP:OWN is inapplicable and disregard WP:CYCLE. That screenshot is gone.  WikIan - ( talk )  20:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cornerstone Fellowship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danville ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cornerstone_Fellowship check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cornerstone_Fellowship?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Desktop and UWP.png
Thanks for uploading File:Desktop and UWP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bashonwin10.png


The file File:Bashonwin10.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned. The content of this screenshot would seem to make it unencyclopedic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cornerstone Fellowship Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cornerstone Fellowship Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cornerstone Fellowship Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cornerstone Fellowship Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:CF Easter Sunrise Service April 2019.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CF Easter Sunrise Service April 2019.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 05:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)