User talk:Wiki-Encycopedia

List of hacker groups
Hi Wiki-Encyclopedia. I've reverted you twice now on your insertion to List of hacker groups, because that list is reserved for groups that are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia article. While there is an article called Black bloc, it's about a tactic used by protesters, not a hacker group. Unless that group has been discussed in multiple, independent reliable sources, it won't be notable enough for an article, and so also can't be added to that list. As a side note, for future edits, please don't put your username into Wikipedia articles--we don't allow the signing in article, though your authorship is recorded in the article's history. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Qwyrxian. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of hacker groups without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Qwyrxian (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Best hackers for 2013


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 13:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohaned Zahran


A tag has been placed on Mohaned Zahran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 13:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Final Warning
You appear to be here for one and only 1 purpose: to write about some alleged hacker or hacker group and promote their alleged exploits. But you've presented no evidence that the group is notable--that is, discussed in independent reliable sources. Your creation of that "Best of" page was particularly problematic, because it was a transparent attempt to avoid the policy based removal of that group; that combined with your blanking of the "List" article because you're not getting your way is indicating that your only goal is to disrupt this website and promote that group. If you engage in any more disruptive editing, you will be blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2013 (UTC)