User talk:Wiki4132

Speedy deletion of Konqistador
Hello Wiki4132, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on May 4 2010, Konqistador, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Cunard (note: page has no mainspace links, and 3 edits). This has been done because the page is an almost identical copy of a page deleted via a deletion discussion (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Cunard. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 18:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Konqistador
I see you re-created an article that was deleted not too long ago. Re-creating an article on a non-notable subject can be seen as disruptive. There hasn't been any changes from the original article. You stuff on the talk page of the article that they are notable and so on, but you there is still no evidence of notability. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 22:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


 * If you disagree with the result of the deletion debate, or if you've found more sources that could fix the problems with the article, then you might wish to have a look at Deletion Review. Hope this helps, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Request assistance, wiki page was fully re-created after first deletion discussion, wiki guidelines were adhered to and template for musician page was established, old content was not re-posted, recent posting resembled nothing like previous entry, article is reliable as per references provided, please advise :) - many thanks Wiki4132 (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Consensus at the Articles for Deletion debate was that the article should be deleted. You contend, based on your sources, that it should not be. Deletion Review is the process by which an old deletion decision is reviewed - and that's where you want to present your case for why the article should be kept or restored. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)