User talk:Wiki443556

Trivia
Thanks for adding some fact to my trivia page, but I want to let you know that one of them is false. The spot on 7UP did not come from its inventor who had red eyes. He was not an albino. See Charles Leiper Grigg and its source here. Reywas92 Talk 20:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pikmin species
A tag has been placed on Pikmin species requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Gromlakh (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Captain Olimar
Hey dude, I understand that you're a diehard nintendo fan and all, but why are you restoring a mess of a page of Captain Olimar. No offense, but I don't believe that his article asserts any notability, and I see that that's the reason why TTN's proxy has reverted it. If you bring it back, at least get rid of all the fancruft and improve it, alright? ZeroGiga (talk) 00:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. —TreasuryTag —t —c 08:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

that's not original thats from the bbc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.13.183 (talk) 10:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Chek Whyte for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chek Whyte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chek Whyte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)