User talk:WikiBear2000

Paid editing
Prior to doing any further editing, please directly answer with only a "Yes" or a "No": Are you being paid or compensated to edit Wikipedia? Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

No
 * Thanks for clarifying that. To be quite honest, you show a striking similarity to those who do, but I'll take your word for it. That being said, your editing is disruptive, especially your use of inappropriate sources in biographies of living people, such as blogs and Youtube. Prior to further editing BLPs, please review what makes a source reliable, and ensure that any references you use meet these standards. Also, please familiarize yourself with requirements of neutrality, especially due weight. We do not need an article to contain trivia and small details, it should be a broad overview of a subject. And some of your editing has looked quite promotional, hence the question regarding being paid. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and finally, please remember that we refer to people upon their first mention in an article by their first and last name. If they are commonly known by a nickname, we'd include that in quotes. Thereafter, they are referred to using just their last name, with no "Mr.", "Dr.", etc. So the first time is Jonathan "John" Doe, and after that he'd just be referred to as Doe. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm doing my best to continually edit and learn about how the system works, to create well-sourced articles, and trustworthy references. Got it about nicknames. I have been trying to "mix up" the name usage, so each sentence doesn't begin the same.

Do I need to take any further action regarding my "suspect behavior" of creating and improving wikipedia articles? WikiBear2000 (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No, not really. Just take a bit of time to review things. We certainly all were new once, but especially with BLPs, we want to take a lot of care. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jessica Pilot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Pilot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jessica Pilot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 09:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Dodoodad.com as a source
Hi WikiBear2000. I noticed that you recently used dodoodad.com as a source for information in a biography of a living person, Amber Midthunder. I'm unable to find any evidence or discussion on how dodoodad.com could be a reliable source at all, much less the type of high-quality source required for biographical information. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Amber Midthunder
Hey,Ronz I was watching a show Amber Midthunder was on (Legion FX), and did my best to cite the unsupported claims in her Wiki. If that site doesn't seem trustworthy, feel free to remove it. Thanks

Proposed deletion of Marc Mani


The article Marc Mani has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nothing to indicate he is notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erode Nagaraj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disciple ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Erode_Nagaraj check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Erode_Nagaraj?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Jessica Pilot) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jessica Pilot, WikiBear2000!

Wikipedia editor TomCat4680 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Always refer to people by their full name, last name only, or pronouns."

To reply, leave a comment on TomCat4680's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

TomCat4680 (talk) 02:48, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baktruppen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dilettante and Troupe ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Baktruppen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Baktruppen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (411 Video Magazine) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 411 Video Magazine.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 04:38, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Why Won't You Date Me?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raya ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Why_Won%27t_You_Date_Me%3F check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Why_Won%27t_You_Date_Me%3F?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malicious compliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autumnal equinox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)