User talk:WikiCVU

March 2015
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Fablahlafuv may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.  Kharkiv07 Talk  18:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Be nice to the newbies. WikiCVU (talk) 18:30, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Your recent edits may be a violation of Wikipedia policy, however I'd rather not discuss it on-wiki. If you enable the email function on your account I'd be more than happy to discuss it with you.  Kharkiv07 Talk  18:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Kharkiv07, I prefer transparency. If you wish to charge me with violating Wikipedia policy, please do so publicly. WikiCVU (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I will not, but if you look back in the history of your edits you can see that they've been removed, which means that a Wikipedia admin or oversighter agrees that it's a violation. Please do not replace it.  Kharkiv07 Talk  18:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * See the entry in the deletion log here  Kharkiv07 Talk  18:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Kharkiv07, why do you say "Unfortunately"—are you gunslinging for newbies? WikiCVU (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Judging by the reason given in the reason for deletion, I'd check out the policy on privacy, but besides that I don't want to get dragged into an argument here.  Kharkiv07 Talk  19:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I have amended some of your comments on another user's page, and revision-deleted prior versions. Please stop trying to identify editors by linking to Twitter; this is a violation of Wikipedia's outing policy, constitutes harrassment, and will result in your account being blocked from editing if you do it again. Yunshui 雲 水 13:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Yunshui: No good deed goes unpunished. WikiCVU (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * WikiCVU please just take a quick look over the outing policy, outing is a major issue here, however you've been making positive contributions so I'd hate for you to get blocked.  Kharkiv07 Talk  17:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Kharkiv07, do whatever you feel is necessary. But please stop threatening me. It violates both Assume good faith and Arguments_to_avoid_in_edit_wars. WikiCVU (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Once again, I'm not going to get into an argument here, but I'd like to say that I believe I've done a reasonable job trying to help you and I don't believe I've been threatening. I'd honestly like you to stick around, I've been flipping through your contributions and I think you could be a great benefit to the project.  Kharkiv07 Talk  21:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked this account. Not only is it a sockpuppet, it is violating policy in clear ways even after being warned. Appeal of this block is directly to ArbCom only. If you wish to contest this block, arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org is the address you need to contact. Courcelles (talk) 20:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)