User talk:WikiConqueror

Mandatory ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Suggested Reading
I've not been the most gracious of hosts - hell, from your point of view I've probably been rather mean and/or cruel to you since you first had the misfortune to cross with me - but as a new user I thought I'd leave a link for you: WikiProject Military history/Academy. The stuff in there is somewhat specialized to the Military history Project, but as you are making a good faith attempt to contribute here I thought you may be able to make some use of the material present. Our academy was set up to help out new comers and to offer advise and suggestions on how to make useful contributions with an eye toward milhist, but I figure it can't hurt to offer a helping hand. If you can use something from there in your Wikipedia editing then it wasn't a wasted effort. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I really appreciate it! WikiConqueror (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your article
Thank you for creating A Concert of Remembrance.

However, there are not enough sources to prove the topic is notable, or that it's suitable for a standalone article.

Notability on Wikipedia is based on notice from the outside world. Topics have to be described in detail by several reputable sources before it can merit a standalone article. Reputable sources include news, books, and academic articles. Non-reputable sources include gossip, social networks, YouTube, and blogs.

Please add sources to prove that your topic is notable; otherwise the topic cannot be covered on Wikipedia. Here are some searches you can conduct to find them:

If you can't find sources after a search, it may be deleted. However, you may also want to consider merging or redirecting to another article even if it is not notable.

You may find the below resources to be useful:
 * Help:Referencing for beginners - a guide to adding sources to articles.
 * Notability - more detailed description of the requirement of notability.
 * Help desk - for asking questions about Wikipedia and editing.
 * Tutorial - learn the basics in under an hour.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask via a reply below. Thank you. Esquivalience  t 23:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, a note about the article: events, such as individual performances, require not only notability, but also lasting effect or coverage, because Wikipedia is much more of an encyclopedia than a newspaper. This means that even performances by the most notable orchestras (such as the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra) do not get articles. This article even qualifies to be deleted quickly, as it does not demonstrate notability (by citing sources), significance, or importance. I reverted my initial tagging because redirection was an option and I wanted to explain the notability guidelines to you before doing anything, but I strongly suggest that you blank-and-redirect the article to Elgin Symphony Orchestra. Esquivalience  t 23:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Esquivalience. I added some more sources to prove that my topic is notable and some new categories.  I don't think that the article should be blanked and redirected because the article should stand alone as a memorial for the September 11 attacks. WikiConqueror (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making an effort to find sources and working to advance Wikipedia's coverage of 9/11 (indirectly); nonetheless, Wikipedia has a very high bar for standalone event articles (per the notability guidelines for events), and they need to have a lasting effect or significance–as Wikipedia is not a newspaper. However, the symphony can still be covered in the article about the orchestra who performed it (Elgin Symphony Orchestra); readers who want to read about the performance will most likely know it not by name but by its corresponding orchestra's name. Esquivalience  t 00:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anne Apra


A tag has been placed on Anne Apra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 02:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frantic Lounge Films


A tag has been placed on Frantic Lounge Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael McAdam


A tag has been placed on Michael McAdam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelli Crawford


A tag has been placed on Kelli Crawford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JP Sarro


A tag has been placed on JP Sarro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Voices Keri


A tag has been placed on Voices Keri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Voices Keri for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voices Keri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Voices Keri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Melanie Salisbury


The article Melanie Salisbury has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Lack of notability. I find no independent coverage of substance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blane Pressler


A tag has been placed on Blane Pressler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Artes Vocales of Los Angeles


The article Artes Vocales of Los Angeles has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable group. Few Google hits for, generally affiliated, event listings, and blogs. One unhelpful hit under Google News.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Venom (2014 film)


The article Venom (2014 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable short film. Google yields 73 hits for, none with nontrivial coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Haunters (TV series)


The article Haunters (TV series) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable TV series. Series? One season, one episode?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Undercover Squad


The article The Undercover Squad has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable TV "series" (never got past the pilot), no applicable coverage found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A kindly intended note
I suspect the above torrent of deletion notices has squelched your enthusiasm. I feel bad about that because your earnestness is clear. But I do see that you've had some articles deleted in the past, and some of the ones that User:Reddogsix and I deleted in the last hour or so are older but may have missed scrutiny before.

I'd like to recommend that you continue to identify subjects for good Wikipedia articles, but that when you do, you check first to make sure they are notable, as I explained to you in my remarks at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Whine Party. If you can scrounge up enough suitable source yourself, that have substantial coverage, are independent of the subject (not the actors' own websites, not the program from a theater where the symphony performed, etc.), and aren't routine and relatively trivial (like local theater listings) that will really help in cases where those are hard to identify. Largoplazo (talk) 02:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lisa Christine Holmberg


Hello, WikiConqueror. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Lisa Christine Holmberg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Largoplazo (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ron Bush


The article Ron Bush has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, stated to be best "known for" bit parts in a TV series episode and a film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Precious
Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1789 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Metalheads (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metalheads (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Metalheads (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. schetm (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)