User talk:WikiCopter/Archives/2011/1

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 13:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Arado E.381 3rd A class review
Many apologies for that, half cocked and blind. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I know. I was so annoyed I almost blew my top. =). WikiCopter (t • c • g &bull; simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 03:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I feel you would have been justified. I double checked my commentaries before posting, thought I'd checked for that September source (blind eyes), and was silly.  Please do ping my account when you go through FAC, its worth me explaining the sourcing issues twice to other FAC regulars. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do. Please also give a giant support in FAC :). WikiCopter (t • c • g &bull; simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 01:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Livonian War GA
Just to ask you without it getting wrapped up in everything else: what exactly do we need to do for GA status remaining. I'm a little worried the ultimate goal of FA might start getting in the way; because a GA's coverage need be balanced, applying FA-standard detail to some areas might create a lack of balance, even if other areas are up to GA standard. Thanks Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 16:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 21:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 17 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:48, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011 Wikification Drive
Sumsum2010 · T · C · Review me! 02:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors
Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I would LOVE to be an Ambassador, but currently I am having some issues in real life, thus I probably will delay joining for a later time. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ &bull; ♥ • ♦ &bull; simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 20:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then, I look forward to hopefully working with you later on. Cheers! --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify's Coordinator Election
Sumsum2010 · T · C · Review me! 22:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Operation Iskra
I was wondering if you are still reviewing the article for GA?D2306 (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Oldenburg GA
Hey WikiCopter, is there anything else I need to do on SMS Oldenburg (1910) before you'll be satisfied it meets the GA criteria? Thanks again for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The Wikifier, WikiProject Wikify's First Newsletter (January 2011)
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 02:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC).

Canopus class GA
You may not have noticed, but I've started the review at Talk:Canopus class battleship/GA2.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to, who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by , with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to, who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, , who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 00:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

Added template for SuggestBot
Hi,

Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.

We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.

We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Submarines in the Book of Mormon
In the Book of Mormon, Mahonri Moriancumer builds unpowered submarines to cross the ocean to the new world. Should they be mentioned in Submarines? Otherwise, what list of submarines could these go under? Placing them under List of fictional submarines would generate controversy. They are worth mentioning. Heyzeuss (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Drive graphs
I understand you've been busy, but do you mind updating the drive graphs? They haven't been updated since February 8. Thanks. Guoguo12 --Talk--  14:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, until then, I've updated it with my own version of Excel, though I didn't use your settings, apparently. Guoguo12  --Talk--  14:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Due to off-wiki constraints, I probably won't be able to do that today, since the file is on my family computer. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ &bull; ♥ • ♦ &bull; simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 14:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Thanks for letting me know; I've got it covered for now. Guoguo12  --Talk--  16:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Atlanta GAR
Just wanted to say thanks for reviewing! Also, do you think the article's ready for FA status? Guoguo12 --Talk--  01:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Dunno. Actually, you might want to take a look at the below:
 * The "L"-shaped line of battle roughly corresponds to what is now Moreland Avenue between Little Five Points and I-20 as the north-south line and Interstate 20 as the east-west line where Hardee made his attack. The Atlanta Cyclorama building, built in 1921, contains a painting and museum of the battle I-20 = Interstate 20, right? If so, they can't be N-S and E-W at the same time! WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ &bull; ♥ • ♦ &bull; simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 04:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the user who added that almost seven years ago must have made a mistake. I-20 runs E-W, as do all even-numbered interstates, I believe. Either way, I've removed the entire sentence for now as "unsourced possible OR". Guoguo12  --Talk--  19:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Battle of the Chinese Farm GAR
Hey there! I've addressed most of your points in the review. Any more comments? --Sherif9282 (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * It is over indeed; around the time I replied actually! I figured there were more comments coming my way anyhow. Thanks for the review! --Sherif9282 (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Adlertag
Sorry. The way you worded suggested that more was to follow. I also thought it was impossible to have so few things wrong with it so I was waiting for fresh lists of errors. Dapi89 (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That's ok. Probably, that's due to my tendency to give a couple of errors and then flee. When you reply, I reply with more errors. Just as much work at one time as possible :) (call me lazy, but that's the way I am). Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 02:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the Wikipedia Ambassador Program
Hi WikiCopter!

Congratulations! Your application to join the Wikipedia Ambassador Program as an Online Ambassador has been accepted.

First off, I apologize for the following info-dump. If you're wondering how to get started or are wondering what's going on, please contact me.

If you haven't already done so, take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines: Online_Ambassadors/Guidelines

The "mentorship process" section lays out approximately what will be expected of you as a mentor. If you'd like, you can also volunteer to be the coordinating online ambassador for a class or two.

Please add yourself to the top of the list of available mentors, and note the number of students you think you'd like to mentor next term (it doesn't have to be a final answer, this is just to help with matching students and mentors once the students start getting active) and if you'd like to take on the coordination role for any classes note that as well: Online_Ambassadors/Mentors (Don't add yourself to the lower "Additional online ambassadors section; that's for ambassadors-in-training and ambassadors who are already mentoring all the the students they want to take on.)

To coordinate between Online Ambassadors and Campus Ambassadors, we've been using a Google Group as a mailing list. It's not required, but almost all the ambassadors are on it. Would you like me to subscribe you? Email me with your email address if so.

You can catch with what's been going on so far with the first major message this term, with details about what the group should and shouldn't be used for: Wikipedia_talk:Ambassadors

You can also check out the first two ambassador newsletters, which have more detail about what's going on right now. You'll get future editions delivered to your talk page.

If you use IRC, please consider adding #wikipedia-en-ambassadors and #wikipedia-en-classroom to your channel lineup.

Finally, please help us find more mentors! Because the number of students, and their involvement with mentors, is increasing so much for this term, we're going to need a lot of solid Online Ambassadors. Please take a few minutes to think of several other editors you know who would make good mentors, and invite them to apply the the Wikipedia Ambassador Program. The key things we look for are: regular activity (so that we can be confident they'll keep up with their mentoring role for the whole term), friendliness, and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones). You can point them to Online Ambassadors for information on how to apply and what to expect.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Mentoring students: be sure to check in on them
This message is going out to all of the Online Ambassadors who are, or will be, serving as mentors this term.

Hi there! This is just a friendly reminder to check in on what your mentees are doing. If they've started making edits, take a look and help them out or do some example fixes for them, if they need it. And if they are doing good, let them know it!

If you aren't mentoring anyone yet, it looks like you will be soon; at least one large class is asking us to assign mentors for them, and students in a number of others haven't yet gotten to asking ambassadors to be their mentors, but may soon. --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

groups of students in need of mentors
Hey WikiCopter. One of the classes working with the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, Jonathan Obar's Media and Telecommunication Policy, is working in small groups and would like us to assign a mentor to each group (rather than having students request the mentors they'd like, as other classes are doing).

I invite you to sign on as the mentor for one or more groups, especially if any of the topics catch your interest. To sign up, go to the course page and add yourself as "Mentor: you" in the section for that group. They students and/or professor or campus ambassadors should be cleaning things up soon to list all the usernames for each group and add a few more groups. Once you know who the students are in the group, you can leave them each a quick introduction to let them know you'll be mentoring their group.

Thanks!--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

March 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi. On behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am inviting you to sign up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive. Win a barnstar! It's fun. -- Diannaa (Talk) 01:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to (first, with 487 points) and  (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Please be the mentor for the students working on Broadband.gov
Hi again, WikiCopter! I'm currently trying to assign mentors to all the remaining groups in Professor Obar's class. Would you be the mentor for the group of students working on Broadband.gov (not yet created)? If you can do it, thanks! If not, please let me know.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 00:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassador Program
Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 04:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Kyongju/GA1
Hey, just poking you on this review, since it looks like your concerns were at least answered for follow-up. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Some thoughts on disputes
I saw your exchange with Swarm at your RfA. I don't want to pile on, but I'd like to give you what I hope will be useful advice. I do not know Swarm, nor can I pretend to be certain what Swarm meat, so I'll tell you what I would be thinking had I responded the way Swarm did:

No, I am absolutely not suggesting that you lie on an RfA. You shouldn't for any reason, even if you don't think you will get caught, but you are right, if you do and get caught, RfA over. The correct response when asked if you have been in a dispute is to say Yes.

However, you don't want to explain that the reason for the dispute is a lack of maturity. Part of the point of RfA is to judge your maturity (not your age). I haven't read the details of the dispute, so I'll advise generically—a better answer would be to say "Yes, I was in a dispute, and here is what I learned from it."

While Swarm didn't mention your follow-up sentence: "I hope I will never be in a dispute again...". You are asking to be an Admin. Admins deal with disputes. And if you point out there's a difference between being dragged into an existing dispute, and being party to a dispute, point granted, but there will be a situation where an editor is doing something inappropriate, and an admin will be asked to talk to that editor and it won't go well. It will be a dispute. We do NOT want to hear that you hope never to be in a dispute, we hope to hear how you intend to act when you are inevitably involved in a dispute. (To your credit, you partially recognize this in the rest of the sentence.)

I think you'll do OK. Treat this as a learning experience.-- SPhilbrick  T  16:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Sphilbrick has my sentiments exactly correct. There's nothing wrong with disputes. The community just wants to know how you handle disputes and what you've learned from past disputes. This question is, in many ways, one of the most important ways we look at a candidate's maturity. So, as Sphilbrick said, I just want to know how you handled past disputes and what you learned from them. Instead, you unwittingly admitted to the community that you're immature. That's simply an RfA-killer. The big concern with your RfA is obviously your level of maturity. That means you must work extra hard to convince the community that you're mature enough for adminship. You did the opposite, essentially saying "I am immature" to the community. If I can clarify my oppose rationale any further, please just ask. Regards,  Swarm   X 17:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I did not admit I'm immature. I admitted I had been immature. Also, I don't really care what kind of impression I make, as long as the impression is an accurate represtation of what I was, what I am, and what I will be given admin tools. RfA FAC Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 01:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your RFA
Much as I hate to say it, it's looking like your RfA is going to come up against more resistance than it can overcome. Unless something changes fairly soon, I'm going to suggest you think about withdrawing. Don't be disheartened by this; I've seen editors try five or six RfA attempts before they're finally given the mop. Read through all the commentary, learn from it, gain some more experience, and try again. Regards, --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 19:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Your RfA
I'm sorry to tell you that I've closed your RfA as unsuccessful. I wish I had better news, since you're obviously a dedicated editor who has the project's best interests at heart. I would suggest perhaps spending some time in the mainspace and getting some recognised content under your belt—this will both enhance your knowledge of policies and guidelines and give you a more proven track record of applying them, which people at RfA like to see. Adminship can be challenging. It requires a thick skin and good judgement and it's really not that much fun, so it would be a mistake to see it as some sort of goal, but if you decide that adminship is where you would be most helpful to the project, try to prove wrong the opposers who question your maturity and judgement. I'm sure the majority of them would be very happy to be proved wrong, but the consensus seems to be that now is not the time. Keep your chin up and don;t let it discourage you. You're a good editor. You know where I am if you need anything, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Questions at your RfA
No, my questions at Requests for adminship/WikiCopter 2 were not intended to be trick questions. They specifically address issues I saw at Articles for deletion/Development of Windows 8, at which you made comments two weeks ago. You advocated for a WP:SNOW closure and an unsupported speedy delete and merge claim only one hour, two minutes into the AfD. I suggest reviewing WP:SNOW and WP:MAD. Best of luck, / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify's March Mini Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Marking articles students are working on
Howdy, Online Ambassador!

This is a quick message to all the ambassadors about marking and tracking which articles students are working on. For the classes working with the ambassador program, please look over any articles being worked on by students (in particular, any ones you are mentoring, but others who don't have mentors as well) and do these things:


 * 1) Add  to the articles' talk pages.  (The other parameters of the WAP assignment template are helpful, so please add them as well, but the term = Spring 2011 one is most important.)
 * 2) If the article is related to United States public policy, make sure the article the WikiProject banner is on the talk page: WikiProject United States Public Policy
 * 3) Add Category:Article Feedback Pilot (a hidden category) to the article itself.  The second phase of the Article Feedback Tool project has started, and this time we're trying to include all of the articles students are working on. Please test out the Article Feedback Tool, as well.  The new version just deployed, so any bug reports or feedback will be appreciated by the tech team working on it.

And of course, don't forget to check in on the students, give them constructive feedback, praise them for positive contributions, award them The WikiPen if they are doing excellent work, and so on. And if you haven't done so, make sure any students you are mentoring are listed on your mentor profile.

Thanks! --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Time limits on adminship
Hi I have proposed time limits on adminship. I'd appreciate your input! --Surturz (talk) 07:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

My GA nomination
Thanks for going through my nominated articles, but I have decided to remove the nomination for now so I could go over it again. I might try to have another go later.Canpark (talk) 06:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program Newsletter: 21 March 2011
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

SMS König Wilhelm
Hey WikiCopter, I was wondering if there was anything else you wanted to see added or fixed before the article is ready for GA? Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is with 231 points, who leads Pool H.  (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 01:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:18, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive


On behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, we would like to take the time and thank you for your contributions made as part of the March 2011 Good articles backlog elimination drive. Awards and barnstars will go out shortly for those who have reviewed a certain number of articles.

During the backlog drive, in the month of March 2011,
 * 522 GA nominations were undertaken.
 * 423 GA nominations passed.
 * 72 GA nominations failed.
 * 27 GA nominations were on hold.

We started the GA backlog elimination drive with 378 GA nominations remaining, with 291 that were not reviewed at all. By 2:00, April 1, 2011, the backlog was at 171 GA nominations, with 100 that were left unreviewed.

At the start of the drive, the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 101 days (Andrei Kirilenko (politician), at 20 November 2010, reviewed and passed 1 March 2011); at the end of the drive the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 39 days (Gery Chico, at 24 February 2011, still yet to be reviewed as of this posting).

While we did not achieve the objective of getting the backlog of outstanding GA nominations down to below 50, we reduced the GA backlog by over half. The GA reviews also seemed to be of a higher quality and have consistently led, to say the least, to marginal improvements to those articles (although there were significant improvements to many, even on the some of the nominations that were failed).

If you would like to comment on the drive itself and maybe even make suggestions on how to improve the next one, please make a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011. Another GA backlog elimination drive is being planned for later this year, tentatively for September or October 2011. Also, if you have any comments or remarks on how to improve the Good article process in general, WikiProject Good articles can always use some feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles.

Again, on behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, thank you for making the March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive a success.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

GA nomination
Hey, do you mind reviewing an article I've been working on for GA status? I'd simply add it to the requests list, but I was wondering if you wanted to do it. The article is Southeast Asia Treaty Organization. Thanks. Guoguo12 --Talk--  21:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind. Guoguo12  --Talk--  21:17, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Warspite Collab
Hey Copter! How are you doing! I noticed you had put your name next to HMS Warspite on the OMT Phase One page. I had planned to work on her last summer, but my time was taken up with Sevastopol. I have a few books on her. How do you feel about a collaboration? Buggie111 (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't mind any collabs right now. I'm on forced wikibreak until saturday, will give details then. FAC Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 15:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. School has got you down (sorry for any assumptions). Well, I'll talk to you then. Buggie111 (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * School has got me down. I will probably be most active Thursday, Saturday and Sunday, with a little in the morning (UTC-7) of Friday. I can collab on Warspite with ya. FAC Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 02:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll start on Warsipte on Friday (my school district has given us a free break on Friday), and I'll let you pick up on Saturdady. Buggie111 (talk) 02:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you also help me around with the other QE ships? Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 02:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I personally think we should start with restructuring. Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 02:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I actually think that he organization of the article is ok, but I'd like to here your thoughts. I'll also try to do the other QE's, but IDK what time I'll have. I have an importnat WWII RL project to work on. Buggie111 (talk) 03:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I would use as our model Parsec's GA SMS König Wilhelm as our basis for structure, or one of Sturm's GA/FAs. Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former
 * Could you check over my added cites, please? Buggie111 (talk) 23:25, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I undid some of what you did (manually, so I didn't remove all of what you did). Check it over.
 * Said that Warspite was advocated by Adm. Fisher and Churchill, not designed :).
 * Unhid the design section. Wondered why that was missing.
 * I don't have Watton's book, so I can't check your cites... Sorry. (I don't think you'd add a cookbook to the refs, though :).)
 * Warspite seems to have collided with so many ships, so many times, that we should get a section just for Warspite's collisions (title: Notable Accidents/Collisions).
 * I think it would be modernised, not modernized, since this is british english. Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 23:48, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * On the account of 1, that must have bee collateral damage. 2: My design section writing skills failed miserably over my wikibreak. 3:... 4: Usually, that comes along in the service history, just like a fire or hitting a mine. But that should be considered. 5:Yup. I missed that. Buggie111 (talk) 23:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program Newsletter: 22 April 2011
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

glooer
Hello fellow patroller. I was thinking you were beating me to the revert quite a bit! Never tried Igloo so I have no opinion. Frosted Δ 14 23:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's see... I guess it's a tie. Gotta try harder :). Wikicopter what i do s + c cup&#124;former 23:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

MOTD's State of Emergency + 1st of May's Motto
As you probably already know, we are facing some problems at MOTD. I am personally monitoring all the nominations on a daily basis and I'm finding very difficult to aprove the motto for the next day. The number of nominations has grown significantly, but even then it seems not enough. Please, if you have time, take a look at the nominations. And, if you like some of them but you think they are not good enough for being approved because of the set of links or and etcetera, please, try to improve them where it is possible. At this rate, I fear that we will see the end of the project. Thanks in advance. I have also added a special nomination for this Sunday, 1st of May (International Workers' Day or May Day). Please, take a look at it if you can. All the best. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 15:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

P.S.: I'm sorry to bother you again, but take a look at this if you can. Once again, thank you. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 18:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 April newsletter
Round 2 of the 2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.

This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to and  who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored; featured sounds, featured portals and featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to (who has been eliminated) for his work on In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!

Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Mother's Day 2011 or 2012
Okay, I'm here again to bother you (again and again... sorry). Things seem to go much better at MOTD, right now. THANK YOU!!! The reason why I'm writing you is the following: next Sunday (8th of May) is Mother's Day. I know that it is celebrated on different days around the world, but I'd love if we could (and are able to) make our "very-little" contribution in honour of all the mothers in the world. For the upcoming 8th of May (Sunday) there is already a motto in schedule, but I think that we can move the motto approved for that day to another date and to put one about mothers in place of it. Here is my nomination. Thank you in advance and all the best! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 12:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

MOTD Barnstar for helping to keep our project "alive"
A brief note, please, read it carefully, especially the last part in bold: The last time we (our project) gave awards to our (its) members on last Summer, then the number of new nominations and reviews of the existing nominations has been diminishing. The end result was the "April crisis" with no mottos for about an entire week. On the contrary, I hope this award will help to maintain our level high or, at least, appropriate to its needs, the needs of our project. I think that around 10 minutes a week to "devote" to the project, when it is possible of course, should be more than enough to achieve the desired result. Of course, I gave you this award personally, in a personal way and not in the name of the project. This is just a way to say a BIG thank you, so, refrain from returning the award to me or I would be overwhelmed by stars and banners and it is not my intention to "profit" on this, really! Please, do NOT return the award! And, there is no need to thank me, it was my pleasure. Thanks again (I think I can speak for all the contributors to MOTD) and all the very best!!! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 19:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Please help assess articles for Public Policy Initiative research
Hi ,

Your work as an Online Ambassador is making a big contribution to Wikipedia. Right now, we're trying to measure just how much student work improves the quality of Wikipedia. If you'd like contribute to this research and get a firsthand look at the quality improvement that is happening through the project, please sign up to assess articles. Assessment is happening now, just use the quantitative metric and start assessing! Your help would be hugely appreciated!

Thank you, ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The Wikifier: March 2011
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 16 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 00:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Polish Underground State/GA1
Just a reminder that this review is still open. Thanks, --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 02:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador sweatshirt
Hi! This is the last call for signing on for a Wikipedia Ambassador hooded sweatshirt (in case you missed the earlier message in one of the program newsletters about it). If you would like one, please email me with your name, mailing address, and (US) sweatshirt size. We have a limited number left, so it will be first-come, first-served. (If more than one size would work for you, note that as well.)

Cheers, Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Please take the Wikipedia Ambassador Program survey
Hi Ambassador,

We are at a pivotal point in the development of the Wikipedia Ambassador Program. Your feedback will help shape the program and role of Ambassadors in the future. Please take this 10 minute survey to help inform and improve the Wikipedia Ambassadors.

WMF will de-identify results and make them available to you. According to KwikSurveys' privacy policy: "Data and email addresses will not be sold, rented, leased or disclosed to 3rd parties." This link takes you to the online survey: http://kwiksurveys.com?u=WPAmbassador_talk

Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments, Thank You!

Amy Roth (Research Analyst, Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 20:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011 Wikification Drive
Sumsum2010 · T · C 04:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Signature
There is no link called Special:Contribs. But, however, Special:Contributions exists. -- The Σ talk<sub style="margin-left:-3.5ex">contribs 04:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I seem to have remember using Special:Contribs before... WikiCopter 05:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Current date
I am very sorry to inform you that it is currently 01:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC) and that the drive starts about 22 hours from now. May has thirty-one days. Guoguo12  (Talk)  01:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ack, failed again :). WikiCopter 02:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * One good thing. Killed six articles from the backlog. I wondered why nobody else had started. WikiCopter 02:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:9px;" class="plainlinks"> Guoguo12 has given you a LOLipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

But honestly, thanks for clearing six articles from the backlog, accidentally as it may be. Next time, try the knuckle method. Guoguo12  (Talk)  02:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

The Signpost: 30 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter
We're half way through round 3 of the 2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by, and  respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)