User talk:WikiDan61/Archive20120926

Archive created 2012.09.26

magic logix
I want to try and clean this up, so it does not have get deleted. what can you recommend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.201.214.17 (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I recommend you demonstrate that the company has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Articles written by independent journalists, not just publication of the company's press releases.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

IIFS
Sir, Sorry. It was a mistake which was not intended for. I was trying to clean up the article; but this happened due to edit conflict. It has been rectified. Thank you for notifying me. Thank you for your support. --Bharathiya 14:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

phantom limbs
To whom it may concern: I realize you've reverted all my changes but as I have stated, it was for a class assignment and I would have removed all the contents within 3-4 days. Regardless, I apologize if this has caused any inconvenience. Thanks and have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merrygoaround (talk • contribs) 22:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please refer to WP:SUP for a explanation of the proper way to use Wikipedia in school projects.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Miami University Glee Club Page
Thank you WikiDan61 for your review and suggestions for improvement to the Miami University Glee Club page. I understand the concerns, and I am working on improving the page based on those suggestions. It may take a little time (couple weeks) given my personal and work schedule. Not sure how long the sweeping process works on Wikipedia, but I would very much appreciate the chance to continue to improve the page. As a glee club that has impressed choral conductors and held its own at recent national conferences, sharing the stage with the Harvard, Morehouse, University of Michigan, and Rutgers glee clubs (all of which, have their own Wikipedia pages) in just the past three years, I and many others, strongly believe the Miami University Glee Club is very much of note. Thank you again for the suggestions and I look forward to improving the page! CDM347 (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

PROD on Chaos Discography
It could probably be speedied - considering that none of the references are actually related to the subject and most of the content is misleading. -Cntras (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Improvisation News
Hi Dan...

Wanted to contest the deletion of Improvisation News... but, wasn't sure how... where do I post it? And how? Here's what I'd say...



Don't know if Wiki realizes this, or if it matters, but IN is used as a reference on other wiki profiles. For instance...

http://wiki.improvresourcecenter.com/index.php?title=Tim_Martin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja_sex_party

Improvisation News is similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook offering a professional networking service, and is a news source, having interviewed everyone from Will Ferrel to Steve Landesberg to Matt Besser.... Improvisation News is also a training center for comedy, offering classes and workshops and recently launched an improv/sketch team that performs around NYC "THE IMPROVISATION NEWS TEAM".... Improvisation News has been covered and mentioned in news articles elsewhere... and on websites from The Groundlings to Second City to College Newspapers all over, like UNC's Daily Tarheel... most coverage centers around The INNY awards, an annual, national award Improvisation News sponsors... here's just a few...

http://dallascomedyhouse.com/tag/improvisation-news/ http://www.dailytarheel.com/index.php/blog/canvas/2011/03/chips_ready_to_rock_your_friday_night_with_its_newest_batch_of_sketch_comedy http://www.observertoday.com/page/content.detail/id/571870/Lucy-Fest-2012-instructor-wins-national-award.html?nav=5018 http://www.secondcity.com/about/news/detail/1548692134423998525/4064391121353881735/ http://www.secondcity.com/about/news/archives/4_1_2012/ http://www.thecomicbible.com/comedyresources.html http://www.studlife.com/news/2012/02/20/k-a-r-l-wins-laughs-nomination-for-national-honors/ http://hughster1.wordpress.com/tag/improvisation-news/ http://chetwatkins.com/tag/improvisation-news/ http://www.ucbcomedy.com/talent/view/1477/dan-avidan http://www.trophywifeimprov.com/news http://cityhallcomedy.com/photos-press/ http://chipsimprov.blogspot.com/ http://unscriptedfest.weebly.com/workshops.html http://www.robschiffmann.com/Classes.html

Let me know if you have any further questions...

Valor Grace (talk) 18:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

thank you
Thanks for your feedback on the improvisation news article. I will continue to update it and add outside references. Thanks for the formatting help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.119.129.17 (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Improvisation News
Hi there - I am a new contributor, and am trying to help create the improvisation news website listing. This is a very real comedy resource that is utilized by established comedians in New York City. Could you please advise me on how to improve the article so that it doesn't keep getting marked/flagged? I have tried very hard to improve it (and appreciate your suggestions) and since you gave me valuable feedback I would appreciate help on how to proceed. I have also contacted some others in the improv community to see if they can contribute to it as well (references and links, etc) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.119.129.17 (talk) 00:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Amir Borghei
Hi Dan, I wrote the article 'Amir Borghei' last year & I just found out that it went under section A7 & was deleted. I was asked by several french & korean car designers to publish this page as a memoir of all his hard work & amazing designs. The only reason why I was asked to do it was that I'm his son & if you want a trusted resource then I think that will be me. There isn't much said about my father in the article, the only goal was for him to have a wikipedia page & to mention his designs. therefor I as his son am asking you to help us re-validate his article. Thank you Sean bors, Texas A&M — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssborghei (talk • contribs) 20:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sean,
 * I don't have access to the article to review, but if it was deleted under WP:CSD, it means you did not show how Borghei is notable under Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. As his son, you are actually not a trusted source.  Because of your conflict of interest, you can't be counted on to write a fair and neutral article.  If your only reason for creating the article was "so that he would have a Wikipedia article", then you shouldn't write the article.   WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

KCC Article
Hi Dan,

I have requested to change my name on your suggestion. Please note I do not represent the society (I am not part of it, I am just interested in old traditions such as this one). The name was just a pseudonym that I thought adds to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Charles C (talk • contribs) 14:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Vala chakradhar rao
Hi. I've declined your BLPPROD of Vala chakradhar rao, as it doesn't apply to dead people. But if you don't see notability attested, please do take it to AfD - I'd investigate and maybe go for AfD myself, but I don't really have time for the WP:BEFORE. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ooops. The article is written in the present tense, so I assumed he was still alive.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

deletion
The article was created in a single edit with no references, no wikilinks and no explanation of the religious terms. Looked like an obvious cut-and-paste, no indication that it was anything other than original research (a bit like the attempted postings of family genealogies we often get). Anyway, it's your decision, no big deal  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Koidanov (Hasidic dynasty) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Koidanov (Hasidic dynasty) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Koidanov (Hasidic dynasty) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Reply from HarminderGhai
The Reply

Changes to International Commission on Radiological Protection page
WikiDan61: I am the Scientific Secretary of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). I'm trying to have some improvements done to the ICRP Wiki entry as the current one is almost empty and out of date. Please don't undo our work. Thanks. Chris Clement, sci.sec@icrp.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by ICRP.SciSec (talk • contribs) 13:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The material you have added is clearly marked at copyrighted at the source website, and is thus a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Even if you resolve the issue (by following the instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted material), the material is inappropriate because
 * it is not written from a neutral point of view and
 * it is not verifiably sourced
 * Also, because of your stated conflict of interest with the subject, you really should not be editing the article at all. If you feel that the information in the article is materially incorrect, you may make a note of that fact on the talk page and an independent editor will evaluate your comments and make appropriate changes to the article.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, WikiDan. We are new to this so learning - please be patient! I can (and will) grant free use of the material from www.icrp.org, which solves the copyright issue. From what I've read it should be enough to be completely up front about our conflict of interest, and because of it we will need to take special care in editing. Nonetheless, this should not prevent us from editing as long as we ensure what we write is from a neutral point of view and use material that is verifiably sourced. Of course this means that we will be very cautions to "inform and reference, not promote or sell", "be transparent about your conflict of interest" and "write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject" etc. Indeed, the wording "as if you don't work for the company" from Wiki's own neutral point of view page implies that it is OK that we work for ICRP (not so much a "company" as a registered charity), and edit the ICRP entry on Wikipedia, as long as we maintain a neutral point of view. ICRP.SciSec (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are allowed to edit the page, but understand that your edits will be given special scrutiny due to the inherent conflict of interest. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely! This is as it should be! ICRP.SciSec (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

ecampus.com
I see that you declined my speedy request, which is fine. However, roughly five hours have elapsed since creation and the page is the same. I believe this article meets CSD. Thoughts?keystoneridin! (talk) 19:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Grant Meteroid
Dan

thanks for the feedback. You said a simple search would have yielded better info can you send me some links? I can't find much info on the Grant Meteorid

I want to add some phots. I have phots of my father cutting the Grant Meteorid.

I will send them to you if you want to see them. Theya re no where else on the intnernet.

I'd like them to be - my father has passed and Id like to share them

jsemkral@comcast.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsemkral (talk • contribs) 17:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If you spell the term correctly ("Grant meteorite"), Google will spit back a ton of results! I am not interested in the photos, but you could upload them to Wikimedia commons.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Dan

I did upload the pictures to the commons. Will they show up when other people google the Grant meteorite ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsemkral (talk • contribs) 17:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If you've included the term "Grant meteorite" in the description of the file, they will show up in the google search. (That's how I found the image to include in the article.)  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Thankful Reply
{{Talkback|HarminderGhai} — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarminderGhai (talk • contribs) 07:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

My created page
I recieved a messege about a page i created saying it is proposed for deletion because of "something i made up one day" this is not just a joke page of something made up its a sport that was invented in our school that we have wrote a book about and are trying to gain noterity (Lumberlad22 (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC))
 * Wikipedia is not for "gaining notoriety", but rather for reporting on things that have already gained notability. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

There is about a thousand people who follow it and i thought that would be enough to start a page, if not i will take it down — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lumberlad22 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless some significant coverage in independent sources can be provided (i.e. coverage of the game in something other than your school or hometown newspaper), then it hasn't yet reached the level of notability required. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

okay ill come back in a year then ;) (Lumberlad22 (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC))

Radio frequency locating
Hi. I'm just letting  you know that I have declined your Speedy  deletion. The creator has since removed what might have been an offending link. That said, feel free to apply any other deletion process that may apply. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I simply redirected to an existing article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

About Gary Blake page
Hi WikiDan61. I see that you wrote that the page I created for Gary Blake doesn't have any references, but I've included more than a few. I work as Gary Blake's personal assistant and most of the information (which is quite objective) I've gotten from his website, or himself. There exist no other credible sources aside from articles he's written, his own personal site, or his books. Which I've attempted to cite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabeC94 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * What you've done is make some vague references to things like "The Writing Workshop" and "Gary Blake's Publications", but those don't really help because
 * there isn't sufficient information in the citation to understand how to access the material
 * the citations appear to be to sources that Blake himself has created or controls, which means that they don't count as reliable sources.
 * Since you are Mr Blake's personal assistant, you have a conflict of interest regarding this subject: your goal is to promote Mr Blake, but that is never Wikipedia's purpose.
 * If, as you state, there exist no credible sources outside of Mr Blake's own writings, then he has not met the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia, and his article should be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

--- My goal is not to promote Mr. Blake -- just have a Wikipedia page so that he can be recognized on the internet. As an author, he is noteworthy enough to have a page. I don't have much of a bias, as I don't work for him currently. I saw he did not have a page, while his colleagues did so decided to create one for him. There are credible sources -- which I have posted -- besides his own publications, that show he is truly an author. I could take the time to "create" more credible sources online, but they would just be reiterations of the sources currently available. Nothing in the article is written with a bias, and to me it seems all very standard. I'm not sure what else there is to say or do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabeC94 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please take the time to read and fully understand Wikipedia's notability guideline and tell me how this subject meets any of the criteria listed there. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

IncNow page
I do not understand how the largest attorney operated registered agent in the state of Delaware, which is the formation state for over half of Fortune 500 companies could be nominated for speedy deletion. There are smaller registered agents in Delaware who have not had their pages nominated for speedy deletion. There must be some sort of problem with my references that warrant this deletion. If you could please explain what this page is lacking or what you find wrong with it, please inform me so I can improve it.Awalczak (talk) 18:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are problems with your references: they are all either primary sources or indicate merely trivial mention, not significant coverage. Being the "largest attorney-operated registered agent in Delaware" is not necessarily a clear road to notability.  Are there non-attorney-operated registered agents that are larger?  Is the registered agent business that notable to begin with?  Being a big fish in a little pond doesn't make a company notable.  I don't see that there is a category for Registered Agents in Delaware, so I'm not sure how I could compare your article to others.  Perhaps these other firms have business beside registered agency that makes them notable.  In any case, the existence of other poor articles on Wikipedia is not an excuse to keep this poor article. Perhaps, when your first article, on Agents and Corporations, Inc. was deleted, you should have looked into the reasons and understood them prior to recreating this new article.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your explanation. Every business in America requires a registered agent from the day it is formed to the day it is dissolved. The registered agent serves the important role of receiving lawsuits and official notices. Registered Agent has a Wikipedia page, so I will assume that there are instances where certain registered agents could be reputable enough to warrant their own Wikipedia pages. Registered Agents do not normally receive significant media coverage. For example, CT (company) is the largest registered agent in the world, and the very few references to its content come from a primary source, a rather vague reference to a book that hasn't been reviewed on books.Google (that also does not recognize CT (Company) in its internal search), and a single German news article. Likewise, Delaware Intercorp, a company that is similar but smaller than IncNow's size (although you wouldn't be able to tell that from its Wikipedia page) uses references to its own website, sources that "indicate merely trivial mention" (as far as I can see), and sources that redirect to pages that don't exist or need a subscription to read. Corporation service company is another massive registered agent that has sources like the Registered Agents I previously mentioned. Perhaps I am misinterpreting the definition of significant coverage.


 * Many people form small registered agent services that operate out of their home or a trailer. People forming a business have the right to be able to distinguish reputable registered agents from the fly-by-night and mom-and-pop registered agent businesses. Being around since 1974 sends a signal of dependability. Another signal of professionalism is being operated by attorneys. For example LegalZoom was started in 2000 by a couple kids in their twenties who obtained venture capital to hire an expensive spokesperson, Robert Shapiro, to make advertisements for them. This does not mean that they are dependable. Instead having corporate lawyers running an incorporation service suggests that the businesses will be set-up properly. There are 7 larger registered agents in Delaware, but there are hundreds smaller. There are also other registered agents in Delaware operated by attorneys, but none have as many customers as IncNow. This sets IncNow aside from the rest. For example, John Williams, vice president gives continuing education seminars every year through National Business Institute on special uses of the Delaware LLC to other Delaware lawyers. When law schools teach corporate law, they teach Delaware corporate law. This makes the business significant to entrepreneurs in America which is the backbone of the American economy. Delaware is the gold-standard for incorporation and the US Chamber of Commerce has ranked it number one since they started their survey on state legal systems. The incorporation services that offer services in all 50 states are not "better" than IncNow because they offer it more states because they are not specialized. Often those incorporation services only file documents provided to them or only follow state default forms. Getting an attorney operated incorporation service to set-up a business means that the business owner can depend on the documents they are receiving not to be default forms full of blanks. At IncNow, we are also the only registered agent in Delaware to provide signature ready documents to customers that are not filled with blanks. This service sets apart IncNow for those in the know and for those who understand the importance of their initial company documents that found their companies, like the founding documents for the United States are important as a basis for everything that follows. As such, the incorporators and registered agents serve a vital role to individual businesses and to the economy generally.


 * Also, IncNow is the company's recognized name and the service that actually incorporates companies. This is why the page was recreated under IncNow and not Agents and Corporations, Inc. Awalczak (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's a lot of argument! Unfortunately, it contains a few fallacies, both regarding the law in general and Wikipedia policies.
 * The primary fallacy as I see it is the advantage of having lawyers run a registered agent business. As I understand it (and I understand it fairly well having just completed the process of incorporating a business), the registered agent's sole function is to receive official documents on behalf of the company (mainly services of process).  So, if a company keeps itself out of trouble that would require service of process, the company will probably never utilize the services of their registered agents, and only employ them because state regulations require them to do so.  So, there does not appear to be any need for a lawyer to perform this function -- anyone with an address should be able to handle the job.
 * You also appear to confuse the function of a registered agent with that of a corporate attorney. I can hire any attorney licensed in Delaware to form a Delaware corporation, and then turn around and hire any other registered agency to handle that function.  I can get a perfectly sound corporate footing without relying on a registered agent who also happens to be an attorney.
 * Thirdly (and this is a Wikipedia thing), you appear to confuse importance with notability. Even if we stipulate the importance of using an attorney-led registered agent (which I don't, but let's assume we do for the sake of argument), this does not make any individual firm notable.  That is only verified by adherence to the Wikipedia notability guidelines.
 * You appear to have ignored the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS guideline that I pointed out before. Just because there are articles on other registered agents, that doesn't mean that this article on your firm should remain.  (I presume from the forcefulness of your arguments that you are employed by this firm in some capacity -- please refer to WP:COI for notes on that.)  If the other companies are insufficiently notable, those articles may need to be deleted also.  But that is a discussion for a different venue.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your response.
 * (A) The assistance of a lawyer operated service helps because the certificate of formation or certificate of incorporation is going to be more complete. For example in Delaware for a corporation, if you use a non-attorney operated formation service in the certificate of incorporation certain things will be missing. For example in a non-profit from a non-attorney operated service, the three paragraphs required by the IRS that state what happens to a company's funds if they go out of business are not included. Before the non-profit corporation can be qualified as a 501(c)(3) it would need to go back and amend its certificate of incorporation. As a second example, in a for-profit corporation under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the certificate must have certain things or you don't get them. These include the right to have director amended bylaws and director immunity for breaches of fiduciary duties, except for breaches of the duty of loyalty. Non-attorney operated services only include the default language that are on the state forms, where this language is excluded. The blanks on the internal company documents is another problem. I am not sure how you received your LLC agreement for your company, assuming it was an LLC, but chances are that it did not have a number of provisions in it which are included in our attorney operated service, for example, valuation provisions if there is a partnership disagreement and rights of first refusal to purchase LLC interests from other members before they sell to third parties. If you have a one-person LLC, these may not be big concerns of yours, but if you had a business partner, this should be a critical concern. The LLC agreement is what controls the relationship in the case of a dispute. It also proves you own the company. If you ever change owners or add a member, if you used IncNow, we could provide you with an amended and restated LLC agreement to properly transfer those interests. (B) The job of the registered agent, after the formation documents are sent out in Delaware, is to ensure that state notices are forwarded to the customer as well as lawsuits. In our notices regarding state notices, we provide detailed instructions on what happens if you fail to file the report and assist in filing the annual report for a corporation or LLC. This is a matter of state compliance to keep your liability shield. Many other agents, simply forward the notice and are not particularly helpful at answering what may be threshold advice or assisting in the process. Of course, if your company is sued by someone, that is why you set-up the business in the first place. You want to have a dependable registered agent who gets the notice to you in a timely manner and even provides some guidance on the next step, in what would be a very stressful situation. (C) The final job is to help at the final stages when it is time to wind-down the operations of the company. The registered agent operated by a lawyer can help save you money by no just telling you what the state tells you, that you need to file a certificate of cancellation, but may provide an alternate method of cancelling by letting the agent resign, which could save you hundreds of dollars.
 * As for the job of the registered agent, the other job is the incorporator. There is no question you can hire a corporate attorney, but doing so would cost at least $1000 and you would end up at the same place if you hired IncNow which is operated by attorneys. This is a value proposition, which differentiates IncNow from the competition and one reason it is the largest attorney-operated registered agent service in Delaware, because IncNow is not just registered agent. It is also organizer or incorporator drafting documents.
 * As far as notable, the companies we act as registered agent for are notable, including Pinterest. Additionally, IncNow has been covered by international television stations ranging from China to Switzerland. The story in China was about the first Chinese person to buy an american bank. It was all over the Chinese News earlier this year and included an interview with John Williams. Swiss National Public Television did an interview with John Williams of IncNow to ask about how Delaware became ranked as the number one tax haven in the world. Also interviewed was the Delaware Secretary of State. John Williams also has presented numberous continuing education conferences to Delaware attorneys about the use of the LLC. He has been interviewed by Compliance Weekly about Senator Levin's beneficial disclosure bill in 2008. Also IncNow was the first registered agent to offer the series LLC on its website in 2004. IncNow was the first incorporation service to have a mobile site with the ability to complete an order form with a mobile device. IncNow has been referenced in a Wikipedia article about the Series LLC since at least 2009. There are all references to this in various sources (check original Agents and Corporations, Inc. article), but seldom significant coverage in the media. Every other registered agent Wikipedia page I have read does not have significant coverage in their references as far as I can see. As far as notability goes, I referenced third-party sources in my Agents and Corporations, Inc. page, but that was also cited for insignificance. It's very difficult for registered agents, although they operate in a billion-dollar industry, to comprehensively meet the standard.
 * The other services fairly deserve Wikipedia acknowledgement. I am not suggesting that they are worthy/unworthy of this recognition because IncNow is worthy/unworthy of recognition. I am trying to put the Wikipedia notability guideline in a context I can understand so that I can improve the page's references to meet these standards. I also referenced them to underline the fact that Registered agent's do not receive much significant coverage within media. I think my examples demonstrated that. Awalczak (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Your assumption that only an attorney will be able to get the incorporation correct is typical of attorneys ("you have to use us or you won't get things right"). The example you give:
 * if you use a non-attorney operated formation service in the certificate of incorporation certain things will be missing. For example in a non-profit from a non-attorney operated service, the three paragraphs required by the IRS that state what happens to a company's funds if they go out of business are not included.
 * may be true if the person handling the incorporation has not done their homework. Having just incorporated a non-profit (not in Delaware) I am familiar with the clause you mentioned and knew therefore that the standard state incorporation form would not be appropriate.  While it is true that an attorney can help with these pitfalls, it is not true that an attorney is required to avoid these pitfalls.  And, you are confusing the role of an incorporator with the role of a registered agent (both of which services your firm appears to provide).  Any attorney can handle incorporation, but I don't need an attorney-based registered agent to get an attorney to be my incorporator.  Getting both services from the same place may be a value proposition, but it does not make your company notable.
 * The notability of IncNow's clients is not really material to the discussion. (Notability is not inherited.)  John Williams' notability as a recognized expert in the field of Delaware corporate law might make him notable, if sufficient significant coverage can be found to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for biographies.  (Note that being used as an "expert" for quotes in articles about other issues generally does not qualify as notability.)
 * The relevant guidelines for notability for companies are found at WP:ORG. The language is quite clear, and should not be difficult to understand.  Basically, you will need to show that any independent publication (either print or online) has looked at IncNow and said "you know, this is something we should write about".  Keep in mind that the main reason for the notability standards is to satisfy Wikipedia's requirement of verifiability.  In order to verify the information in an article, we must rely on independent third-party sources that have reported the information (and ideally have a history of editorial practice that ensures that these facts have been checked).  If the level of coverage is insufficient (i.e. there is insufficient notability), the facts cannot be verified.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * In yesterday's Sunday New York Times above-the-fold on the first page, there was an article about Corporation Trust located at 1209 N. Orange Street in Wilmington, Delaware, our next-door-neighbor, and how it serves as registered agent to over 200,000 entities. Although the article was not about IncNow, it was about the industry and a peer in the industry, which shows how current and notable a registered agent can be in Delaware and how it is the focus of a major publication on its biggest news day, Sunday. This article could have very well been written about Agents and Corporations, Inc. The only reason it was not is because we are only ten-percent of their size. Although that may sound relatively small, few of the larger registered agents are Delaware-focused registered agent services. These specialized services are the ones that know the state's law the best. If you are not up on it, you are down on it. Often other services serve all 50 states and there is no way they can be on top of all the law changes in all 50 states at all times. Therefore having a Delaware focused agent, who knows the law changes, because they are run by attorneys is a significant advantage and sets us apart. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/business/how-delaware-thrives-as-a-corporate-tax-haven.html?pagewanted=all Awalczak (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure I would be bringing that particular article to anyone's attention if I were in the Delaware incorporation business -- it is hardly flattering to your industry. In any case, you can argue up and down about the need for an attorney-based registered agent, but in the end it makes absolutely no difference. Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for companies are very clear, and IncNow does not meet them. If you want to change the criteria, go argue somewhere else. If you think I'm wrong about your company meeting the criteria, prove it. Find the relevant sources that indicate significant coverage in independent publications and I'll be glad to write the article for you! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Radio-frequency identification, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pipeline and Sewer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

The NPP Barnstar

 * Sometimes it's not so easy. In this case, De Saram has lots of valid coverage to draw on.  Thanks for the recognition!  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Chick embryo
Thank you so much for your help! can you tell me more about creating a user page? Anjuliyoung (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Strategis
Inquiring as to what further action we could take to get the Strategis Wikipedia page fully verified.

173.166.21.81 (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The Strategis page is currently (as of this version) marked with several "failed verifications" because facts in the article are referenced with links to web pages that do not, in fact, verify the cited facts. For example, the page lists Ashworth Awards as a client of Strategis, and links to Ashworth Awards' home page (here), a page that does not mention any involvement of Strategis in Ashworth's marketing efforts.  The same is true for all of Strategis' other listed clients.  In order to verify these facts, a link to a page that actually mentions Strategis' involvement in the marketing efforts of the client would be needed -- preferably a link to an independent source, such as a magazine article profile Strategis' involvement in the marketing effort in question.  Since I suspect that such coverage is not available, I imagine the best course of action is to simply remove the client list.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me create the info page on the right and adding the proper colors. I just started editing Wikipedia pages today. Great Thanks, Dan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous1950 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Farhad Bostani
Hi just to let you know, regarding your addition of a Template:unreferenced BLP maintanence tag to Farhad Bostani. In accordance with WP:BLPPROD I've PRODed the article. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * And the same with Grigor Meliksetyan. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I chose to allow the author a bit of time, after informing them of the policy, before nominating for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah I thought that it may have had something to do with that. But the BLPPROD does the same thing but shows how serious it is. In any case it's done now. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

About Consideration
Unverify us cuz its in the policy.Yours Highness (talk) 06:32, 6 July 1887 (UTC)

my apologies
thanks for informing me sir,, hope you could make Jennylyn Mercado's page worth reading and more pictures to come.. thanks though sir! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretlyloveFT (talk • contribs) 15:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

New page for petrolling
If you don't mind can you petrol my new article Jaya Suriya Engineering College. Ramesh Ramaiah talk  19:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks WikiDan61. Ramesh Ramaiah  talk  19:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Bilingual pointers to other WPs
For pointing foreign-language contributors to their own Wikipedias, WP:PNT/T has a useful set of templates, many bilingual - for instance, contrib-el1 would tell the recent Techdev in Greek as well as English. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pointer. I was not aware of those.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nanci Filipelli
Hello WikiDan61, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nanci Filipelli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Not blatantly a hoax. May not be notable, so replace with BLP Prod or AfD.''' You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Selket Talk 21:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * When an article claims that the subject has appeared in three national films, and multiple national television programs, but her IMDb listing list a single appearance in a short film, and none of the IMDb listings for any of the listed productions list an actress of this name among the cast, I call that a hoax. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The subject of the article clearly exists, and the article contains claims of notability. That is sufficient to warrant an AfD.  Determining whether, once the misinformation within the article is corrected, it would still be notable is beyond the scope of CSD review. From WP:HOAX Suspected hoaxes should be investigated thoroughly, and only in extreme cases of blatant and obvious hoaxes should articles be tagged for speedy deletion as db-hoax. You're probably right that much of the material in the article is a hoax, but once you need to do that much investigation, it's no longer CSD material.  -- Selket Talk 22:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Middle Eastern people
You might want to mention it's a declined PROD somewhere in the AfD... p b  p  22:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

VisualDNA Imagini
Hi,

I'm having some trouble with the records I'm trying to edit for Imagini and VisualDNA.

The Imagini record is out of date, but when I try to update it my edits are rejected. The company no longer trades as Imagini or offers the services outlined in the record.

The record I wrote for VisualDNA, the new incarnation of the company is up to date, but has been rejected because of the out of date Imagini incorrect record.

Please can you tell me which record I should edit in order to bring the information properly up to date and avoid needless confusion.

Thanks, Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teag100 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The single source you provided (a press release speaking about VisualDNA (formerly known as Imagini)) is not a sufficient source. I tried to search for a source wherein Imagini announced a change of name, but could find none.  When I visit VisualDNA.com, I find that the page copyright is still held by Imagini Holdings, Ltd, so I find that the evidence for a company name change is some scant.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:53, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

My Block PhonixMIXr
It´s no longer necessary to block me. I have understand that i do not damage wikipedia anymore. Please unblock my account. --217.255.226.75 (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I am not an administrator, and cannot help you in this matter. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

hello, can I remove the notice, please --Dattatreya 45 (talk) 17:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Your comment on this user's talk page
Hi there. I found myself vehemently agreeing with the message you left on the above user's talk page--that is, until I looked at the section header's name. "Please don't waste our time"...really? While this user is obviously inexperienced, they clearly have good intentions. Feel free to continue explaining WP:not, WP:N, whatever else to the newbies... but please don't bite them in such cases. --IShadowed 17:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm all for assuming good faith, but when a user posts bald-faced lies in an article, and is called on them, and then removes one lie while leaving the rest, I stop assuming good faith, and ask the user not to waste out time. If a newbie is making honest mistakes, that's one thing. This was something else altogether.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Analyte Health, Inc.
Hi Dan, Can you please tell me what part of the article titled, Analyte Health, Inc. appears to be biased so I can get rid of it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DIM302 (talk • contribs)
 * I am not the one who tagged the article as "advert-like"; you'd do well to speak to about that.  I nominated the article for deletion because I can find no evidence (either in the article itself or in my searches) to indicate that the company is in any way notable.  You are free to make any comments regarding that issue at Articles for deletion/Analyte Health, Inc..  However, the fact that you have been repeatedly warned about creating this article, and the resemblance of your user name to the initials of one of the company's founders, leads naturally to concerns about conflict of interest.  I make no claim that you are or are not involved with the company, I merely suggest that if you are, you should head the COI guidelines.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I have absolutely no relation to the company founder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DIM302 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, just an odd coincidence then. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Um, thanks! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Sky page
I've reversed my stance and am willing to give up on the page temporarily. Feel free to delete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StereotypicalApps (talk • contribs) 14:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Actually, you didn't decline the speedy. You deleted the page.  But, being bold (and knowing that I had improved on the original), I recreated.  Thanks for the star!  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Quinn Lord
"Little Sparrow" isn´t a bad slang. This is a term of endearment from fan to this actor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.221.9.157 (talk) 11:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Some might consider that it is a term of inappropriate affection given this actor's youth. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi WIki,

I did add UK PLANET page information to WikipediA.

Can you please advice me what did we add wrong? Sorry im not experience user. I did try write information for listing only.

Can you help me - how can we add information about company to Wikipedia.

Regrads Ruslan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.227.132 (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Izzy the Islander page
I'm new to adding content to wikipedia.

I started a page for Izzy the Islander, the mascot at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi. I'd noticed that the University wiki didn't have any information on the mascot. Because I'm a new editor - I am unable to add photos, however I looked at Mascot entries from other Universities, and tried to include the same kind of information.

I noticed you redirected the site to the University wiki page. Problem is, there is still no description of the mascot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheriway (talk • contribs) 17:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Individual team mascots are generally not considered notable enough to have their own Wikipedia articles. Unless there has been a significant amount of coverage from independent sources (i.e. not the school's own newspaper, or the local town papers), then the mascot should not have its own page.  There is a brief mention of Izzy at Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi.  If you have anything to add to that (based on reliable sources), please feel free to do so.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Memory Mucherahowa
Just an FYI, I restored the article per a message on my talk page. I had missed the brief notability claim and they are linked from a couple of articles. The article is a mess, but it shouldn't have been speedy deleted. My mistake. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * What claim of notability? That he plays for a local U14 football team?  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The last sentence where he joins the "senior team", which is the highest level for Dynamos F.C. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

wikipedia automatically? or people working at wikipedia are deleting my pages
hi wikidan61, I assume you're a human because a robot would be able to talk to me instantly methinks. I have a couple of questions. I created a couple of pages that were deleted for different reasons, but the reasons I created them was either to correct their title, because under edit, one can't change the title of a page. the other reason was to create a page for a show that had not yet been made,. If robots are deleting my pages that are just following programming but don't understand the concept of a show, then can you switch them off?. If humans are deleting my pages, can you ask them why. My reasoning is to create links on the list of television programs by name page to a page for each show. In some instances, shows exist within shows, like Terrence and Phillip or all my circuits. Just because there is something called the fourth wall, doesn't mean that these shows don't exist. And unless there is a limit to the internet, I think there should be a page for each show, otherwise the list on the page I mentioned wouldn't have links, and wikipedia's model of an information tree wouldn't exist. In one instance I created a link to a page for a show that had never aired, but a pilot was created, I would like to hear the person? who deleted the page for that pilot thought that it should not get it's own page, but I am more concerned with the show within shows concept being approved, so that each time I do create one, it doesn't get deleted. Thank you, also, I created a new page for Last Call (late night talk show) ,but it was erased, can you tell me why that was, thanks

Gatorbub (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Gator,
 * So far as I can tell, all of the articles you have "created" already existed under different names. For example, you "created" Carole and Paula in the Magic Garden by copying the contents of the existing article The Magic Garden (TV series).  If the name of an article is not correct, there is a process to move pages.  The reason that we prefer this process at Wikipedia is that it preserves the page history, which is a record of all of the edits that went into making the article what it is today.  If you simply copy all of the content into a new page, it looks like you created all of the information yourself, which is a form of plagiarism.  In the two cases that I can find (the Magic Garden example I have already noted and the Electra Woman and Dyna Girl case), your page moves are inappropriate.  In the Magic Garden case, there is no evidence that the show ever went under the title you indicated.  In the EW & DG case, there is not a need for the parenthetical information, because the second article (about the 2001 series) is not really sufficient for its own article.  The single paragraph that already exists in the existing article is all that is needed.  This is also the case for the article on The Edge of Space.  As a segment of an existing program, it doesn't really rate its own article.
 * For these "shows within shows" that you feel deserve their own article, unless there has been significant coverage of these meta-shows in independent media, they do not pass the Wikipedia notability test, and any article written about them will likely be deleted anyway.
 * As for the lists, only actual TV shows should be listed. Meta-shows (shows within shows) should not be listed in articles about actual TV shows.  For example, while we have an article on The Dick Van Dyke Show, we do not have an article (nor should any entries in any lists be created for) The Alan Brady Show, the fictitious program for which Dick and his cohorts wrote.
 * As for your show about Last Call, there is already an article about Last Call with Carson Daly. Since we don't need two articles on the same subject, your article was deleted.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

dear dan, as to the last call page that I created and was deleted, Last Call was a separate show from 1994 that I wrote an entire article about. Carson Daly was not a player on that show, but people such as Tad Low, Sue Ellicott, Elvis Mitchell, were some of the personalities on it. As to your argument, shows within shows should not be listed, If they are a show ,and they are on tv, just within another show, aren't they still on tv? Gatorbub (talk) 13:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Gator,
 * Given that you have had a troublesome start to your editing career here at Wikipedia, I would suggest that you create your Last Call article in your userspace (try here: User:Gatorbub/Last Call (1994 TV series)). Then, once you have something you think is ready, get someone with some experience (me, if you'd like, or anyone else) to review the article and make sure it is ready for publication.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I was just informed that the Alan Brady show was not shown on the dick van dyke show, but just that the characters worked for it. My argument for the creating of articles for the shows I mentioned; it's the terrance and phillip show, all my circuits, the edge of space, the brown hornet , and the itchy and scratchy show were shows that the viewers at home could see alongside the viewers in the various tv shows that housed them. and my previous argument, that if it's a show within a show on tv, is it not still a show on tv? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.20.239 (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

dear dan, I just found a page for the itchy and scratchy show. , So will you or anyone else please not delete the pages I create for the other shows within shows ?, thank you, Gatorbub (talk) 10:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Gator, as I mentioned above, shows within shows do not generally merit inclusion in Wikipedia unless there has been significant independent coverage of the show-within-the-show. As can be seen at the article for Itchy & Scratchy by the copious citations, that show has received sufficient coverage.  The shows you have been writing about have not and therefore do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carole Demas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philemon, John Merrick and Fantastic Journey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I haven't seen those pages before — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.20.239 (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Last Call (1994 American talk show)
Thanks for creating Last Call (1994 American talk show), WikiDan61!

Wikipedia editor Josh3580 has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

"This is a good base beginning of the article. It does need categorised. Also, it looks like the show had a short run, but if possible, you and the WP community should try to expand the article to make it a bit more informative. Otherwise, great job!"

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Josh3580's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

Carol Senf
Still new to this. Certainly did not want to commit "vandalism." I thought that I was supposed to add citations to verify the original claim about Dr. Senf's stature among other specialists. That's why I added the information. Please feel free to delete what's inappropriate. Perhaps others will chime in and add information I don't have. Aestuansintrinsecus (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are supposed to cite relevant facts, but your link to Dings' university website only verifies that he is a professor, not that Senf studied under him, or that such tutelage is in any way notable. Even if the link did verify the fact, it should then be added as a proper citation rather than as an embedded link. Please refer to the guidelines at WP:EL.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 01:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Last Call (1994 American talk show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McLaughlin Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey!
Well, at least you didn't issue me a vandalism warning! :) Cheers! -- Rrburke (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, when I found myself on your talk page instead of an IP talk page, I knew something was wrong! Cheers!  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hiya, new to Wikiformatting but trying to get the pages loaded now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anakha452 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Acmevuk
Hi, I have the situation that almost all of my pages are going to be deleted. As I want to make the painters of Naive Art from Kovacica (considerably one of the best naive art school in the world) visible, but not as a promoter as you reply me on my contest, please, can you explain me, how somebody as ,for example, Mr Michal Povolny, who is 75 years old, without any knowledge about computer, Internet ... can make "alone" his page on Wikipedia? In the same very moment, he is one of the finest living painter of naive art. Should we wait that Mr Povolny die, and than we can make page on Wikipedia?

I'm not trying to be sarcastic, I'm really need explanation, because I have same source for each one of them and that is http://www.naivnaumetnost.com. The Gallery of Naive Art in Kovacica is only institution with written biographies of painters in Serbian language. I made translation on google translator and that's it. Please,help me to understand, where is the mistake. Thank You

Acmevuk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acmevuk (talk • contribs) 20:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Mr Polovny is not expected to make a page about himself on Wikipedia. That would be a conflict of interest.  Nor are you supposed to make a page on his behalf because he wishes to be better known.  That is promotion, and it is also forbidden.  What is supposed to happen is that someone with no other motive than expanding the world's knowledge is supposed to create an article about Mr Polovny based on the reliable sources that exist that have written about Mr Polovny.  But wait, there aren't any, so we can't make that article.  No everyone gets to have a Wikipedia article.  If he is "one of the finest living painters of naive art" as you say, then someone (other than the gallery that represents him, or some obscure blog) should have noticed that and written about him.  If they have, then there is a reliable source and we can use that as the basis of an article.  If no one has yet noticed him and written about him elsewhere, it is not the job of Wikipedia to get him noticed.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for the answer. There is "a reliable source" on http://www.naivnaumetnost.com (http://www.naivnaumetnost.com/en/component/content/article/1-savremenici/18-mihalpovolni?directory=4), as I mentioned, but the problem is ,as I can see, that the article (or biography) is written in Serbian Language.So, if I understand properly, for Wikipedia is reliable source only if is written in English originally? If is it like that, then I understand your point.Maybe the Kovacica gallery have the same problem as I have now.The same "reliable source" is for Zuzana Chalupova. Completely the same! from word to word. And Michal Povolny is "one of the finest painters of naive art" together with Alžbeta Čižikova and Jan Husarik. They are the pioneers of Kovacica school of Naive Art, but what chance does they have, when they are Slovaks ,stucked in Serbian village without "a reliable sources". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acmevuk (talk • contribs) 22:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, a source need not be in English, although that is preferable. The problem with the source you mentioned is that the document was created (or at least published) by the very gallery that is attempting to sell this artist's work, so it can't be considered reliable or neutral.  You need sources written by authors and published in venues that have no connection to the artist.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 04:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Laurien10/sandbox


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Laurien10/sandbox. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Network Hub. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Network Hub – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Good to know I speedied my own created redirect!! LOL WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Deprod
Hi! I have removed the tag from AMBIT (Adolescent Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Lova Falk  talk  13:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Victor Drija
I added references. --BeanZull 15:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rajaram Mukne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Congress Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevvu Keka
Hi,

I created this page today, but i am not sure why this is page is proposed for deletion. Can you please suggest me some procedures to keep this page alive and proceed forward for future updations Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijay3006 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on Wikipedia inclusion criteria, you will need to show evidence that the production of this film has received significant coverage in reliable sources, such as newspaper, trade magazines, etc. The single reference I was able to find was a blog entry in a blog of unknown reliability.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevvu Keka
Hi, Is This sufficient,it has completed its opening ceremony int the month of july http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-22/news-interviews/32787698_1_new-movie-comedy-king-allari-naresh-kevvu-keka

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-25/news-interviews/32847420_1_allari-naresh-kevvu-keka-anr

can provide further details as movie goes on floor Vijay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijay3006 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Castle Comfort Stairlifts
Have edited the page. In terms of local North Staffordshire businesses you would be hard pushed to find someone notable who is as philanthropic in their business. Secondary sources mentioned. Accept that readership figures of Clarion proabably overestimated - amended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitesurfer45 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Companies (and other entities) that are locally notable are not necessary globally notable. The secondary sources that are listed barely touch on Castle Comfort as a company, and only mention their charitable works as an item of local interest. If they had created a foundation that had national scope (and if this could be properly cited), that would be a different issue, but a company donating to its local community is hardly notable.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Raghida Dergham
WikiDan61, Yes, this student made a mistake. The page should immediately be deleted. She has made very few edits on Wikipedia and didn't know what she was doing, and she didn't follow instructions. Thank you for catching this error and by all means delete it. Thank you, Crtew (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't delete it; I'm not an administrator. But it will be quickly taken care of.  I wish your students luck with their assignments!  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Reason for your wish to delete this page
I am informed that a competing stairlift company has flagged up our entry on Wikipedia, hoping you could present a case for deletion. Please confirm if that is true and name that company. K. Simpson MD Castle Comfort Group — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.31.42 (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Mr. Simpson, you do not have an 'entry' on Wikipedia - this is an encyclopedia and not a business directory and you do not own articles here. However, an article about a company with which you appear to be connected is currently being discussed for deletion by the community. You can follow this discussion at Articles for deletion/Castle Comfort Stairlifts. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not represent a "competing stairlift company". I am a Wikipedia user who is interested in maintaining the standards of this website as a presenter of notable I formation, and not a business directory.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 04:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Sir, as an identifiable person, I am simply asking whether or not your action in trying to remove this article is as a result of it being flagged up by a company in a similar business to ours. K Simpson, Castle Comfort Stairlifts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.10.227 (talk) 12:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know what you're talking about. I found the page in my normal course of recent change patrolling (something I like to do here at Wikipedia).  There were no tags on the page when I found it.  But I thought that the page did not adequately indicate why this company met the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia, so I nominated it for deletion.  I don't know what you mean by the phrase "flagged up", and I don't know who you think might have done this "flagging up".  If you are asking whether someone from one of your competitor companies has asked me to nominate that page, the answer is no, and I resent the implication.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hello,

Thank you for editing the MERCI retriever article. The reason why I reverted to the original version of the article was simply due to the short period of time of your revision. I understand that I do not own the page; I simply wanted to allow my supervisor to get a chance to see the page as our group originally created it. We greatly appreciate your insight and time.

Dayanamosa (talk) 02:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orient Express Cocktail Bar
— Northamerica1000(talk) 14:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

2-4-8 Tax Blend
Agree entirely! He has finally accepted that he has no other sources for his article so there is nothing much else to discuss. As you say, hopefully an admin will close and delete and he can move on with his life. Thanks for nominating it in the first place. COI stuff like that almost always results in conflict because it usually means an author has to admit they were wrong to begin with - always tough for people to accept. Cheers mate, Stalwart 111  (talk) 23:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC).

Orient Express Cocktail Bar
— Northamerica1000(talk) 01:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC) Don't intend to inundate you with multiple messages, but please review my comment at this AfD discussion regarding circulation statistics for New York Magazine. 29% of its circulation is national. Thank you for your consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Independent Order of Odd Fellows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Hello, Dan. I see that you put a PROD on Biztosítás szakértő, saying "Article written in Hungarian that, should it be translated, would duplicate content already contained at Actuary. Had it been written in English, it would be a speedy deletion candidate under WP:CSD#A10." However, I don't see that not being in English invalidates CSD A10: it still duplicates an existing article, so I have speedily deleted it. I have quite often seen A10 speedy deletions in this sort of situation. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I chose the PROD route as it allows for a fuller explanation of the reason. A simple db-a10 might not have passed unless the reviewing administrator took the time to translate the page to evaluate that it actually did duplicate existing content.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Good point. I hadn't thought of that. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * However, a point which, as far as I know, is undocumented, is that it is possible to use JamesBWatson (talk) 13:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello Brother!
I like the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdEngage This is very informative page for me, I saw many almost all ads company pages here on wikipedia although they are not notable, but this company AdEngage is notable and has more than 3millions user. Kindly stick this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.78.192.249 (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Since AdEngage has been nominated for deletion, you should make your thoughts known at that discussion: WP:Articles for deletion/AdEngage. Please try to have a better rationale for keeping it other than "I like it".  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Lero-Lero
I am wondering what the status of the Lero-Lero page is. I inputted revisions that should make the page credible. I have also worked with another editor, who helped me really understand how the formatting for all the code works; so, with my new found wikipedia confidence I am sure I can create a successful page for Lero-Lero.Johncumbancha (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on the deletion log, the article has been deleted twice as blatant advertising or promotion. As I recall the last version I had read, your description of the album content was still somewhat promotional and non-neutral, and not based on any sources.  You cannot just say that an album contains a lovely blend of house and reggae (or whatever other words you choose to use); you must indicate that some reliable source has described the album that way.  Based on your username, and your admission that you are an intern for the album's label, any article you write on the topic is going to be subjected to extra scrutiny.
 * I gather that your assignment as an intern has been to create as many Wikipedia pages about this company's artists and products as possible. Please understand that this is not in keeping with Wikipedia policies. Perhaps you need to show the relevant policies to your bosses.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Supertova need to be in Wikipedia. Any suggestions??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnc3525 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * First I'd have to ask why it has to be here. Then I'd suggest finding reliable sources to indicate the notability of the subject.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John J. Ensminger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)