User talk:WikiEditor28582573

Welcome!
Hi WikiEditor28582573! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!&#33;!&#33;) 10:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

2002 Football League First Division play-off Final
You said you would review this GAN for me, do you know roughly when you might be able to do it please? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!&#33;!&#33;) 10:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2002 Football League First Division play-off Final/GA1


A tag has been placed on 2002 Football League First Division play-off Final/GA1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ Amkgp 💬  02:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 24K Magic World Tour/GA1


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 24K Magic World Tour/GA1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Megan Barris  (Lets talk📧)  16:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, 24K Magic World Tour/GA1, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Megan Barris  (Lets talk📧)  16:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. Sulyma moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. Sulyma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but...
Thank you for your GA review on Serious Sam: The Random Encounter. Reviews can be a lot of work, so I generally appreciate people doing them for articles I wrote, but this one appears to have been hastily done, with all criteria apparently checked in 25 minutes, the time it just needs to read the article attentively. I, in no way, want to underestimate your capabilities but I checked your recent contributions, and it appears to you are rather new, with just some 60 edits on record.

Among these edits are two further GA reviews (24K Magic World Tour for and 2002 Football League First Division play-off Final for ), which display a similar situation to mine. and even tagged them for speedy deletion. In other edits, you seem to be adding unsourced content, breaking an important guideline you should have previously known exists, since you reviewed three articles for their verifiability.

This begs the question: Are you sure you know what you are doing? Being new is not a crime, but you might want to consider getting to know Wikipedia's guidelines first before reviewing other articles' qualities. A good starting point would be WP:Tutorial. Please let me know should you need anything else. Regards, IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 10:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The editors of all three reviewed articles have independently withdrawn the reviews. If you intend to review further articles in the future, please make sure you know Wikipedia's central guidelines and follow the basic GA reviewers' guide. Regards, IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 14:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Formatting advice
Hi there. I saw your request at the Teahouse, and while I'm not well versed enough in law, I can give you some general tips about formatting: These formatting pointers are things I've picked up along the way. Hopefully they help you in your future editing too. ◢    Ganbaruby!    (Say hi!) 15:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Only use one blank line between paragraphs. Extra lines creates an extra large space, which we want to avoid.
 * Section headings should be in sentence case (MOS:HEADINGS).
 * Generally, only the first instance of a word should be linked (MOS:DUPLINK). Similarly, you can avoid repeating "United States" after the first instance of "United States Supreme Court" since it's unambiguous which Supreme Court we're referring to.
 * We want to avoid bare URLs (WP:BAREURLS) because of link rot, meaning that the website could be inaccessible in the future. Using the cite web form at the top of the editor (Cite -> Template -> cite web) solves this problem.
 * This applies to talk pages, but please indent your replies with a colon, as you'll se others do at the Teahouse. You can indent further by adding more colons. It makes it easier for users to keep track of who's replying to who.

Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.  (It might already be empty.)
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rodriguez v. FDIC
Hello, WikiEditor28582573. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rodriguez v. FDIC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)